Pore Direction in Relation to Anisotropy of Mechanical Strength in a Cubic Starch Compact

The purpose of this research was to evaluate the relation between preferential direction of pores and mechanical strength of cubic starch compacts. The preferential pore direction was quantified in SEM images of cross sections of starch compacts using a previously described algorithm for determination of the quotient of transitions (Q). This parameter and the mechanical strength were evaluated in compacts of different porosities. Starch was chosen as a model compound for materials with ductile behaviour of which tablets with low porosities can be made and which shows some elastic recovery after compaction. At medium and high porosity Q was significantly higher in the images providing a side view of the compact than in the images providing a top view (0.973 vs. 0.927 and 0.958 vs. 0.874 at 0 mm from the side of the compact and 0.956 vs. 0.854 and 0.951 vs. 0.862 at 3.5 mm), indicating that the pores were mainly oriented in the direction perpendicular to the direction of compression. This was accompanied by a lower crushing force in this direction. This could be explained by considering the pores as cracks which propagate through the sample during crushing. For both directions the crushing force decreased with increasing porosity. The yield strength of the compacts also decreased with increasing porosity, but this parameter was not dependent on the direction of crushing when the porosity was below 10%. The results show that pore direction significantly influences the crushing force but does not influence the yield strength, at porosities below 10%.

[1]  Bruno C. Hancock,et al.  Mechanical property anisotropy of pharmaceutical excipient compacts. , 2006, International journal of pharmaceutics.

[2]  A. Zavaliangos,et al.  Strength anisotropy in cold compacted ductile and brittle powders , 2005 .

[3]  Kees Voort Maarschalk,et al.  Location-Dependent Analysis of Porosity and Pore Direction in Tablets , 2005, Pharmaceutical Research.

[4]  Lucas J. van Vliet,et al.  Separable bilateral filtering for fast video preprocessing , 2005, 2005 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo.

[5]  K. Kachrimanis,et al.  Compact size and mechanical strength of pharmaceutical diluents. , 2005, European journal of pharmaceutical sciences : official journal of the European Federation for Pharmaceutical Sciences.

[6]  C. Renshaw,et al.  Universal behaviour in compressive failure of brittle materials , 2001, Nature.

[7]  G. Bolhuis,et al.  Effect of water on deformation and bonding of pregelatinized starch compacts , 1997 .

[8]  S. Malamataris,et al.  Apparent compressive elastic modulus and strength isotropy of compacts formed from binary powder mixes , 1996 .

[9]  Ragnar Ek,et al.  Compression behaviour and compactability of microcrystalline cellulose pellets in relationship to their pore structure and mechanical properties , 1995 .

[10]  G. Alderborn,et al.  The effect of original particle size and tablet porosity on the increase in tensile strength during storage of sodium chloride tablets in a dry atmosphere , 1995 .

[11]  J. Newton,et al.  The compressive to tensile strength ratio of pharmaceutical compacts , 1993 .

[12]  J. Newton,et al.  A method of evaluating the mechanical characteristics of powders from the determination of the strength of compacts , 1992 .

[13]  R. Rice Relation of tensile strength-porosity effects in ceramics to porosity dependence of Young's modulus and fracture energy, porosity character and grain size , 1989 .

[14]  S. D. Hallam,et al.  The failure of brittle solids containing small cracks under compressive stress states , 1986 .

[15]  T. Ando,et al.  Studies on anisotropy of compressed powders. III. Effects of different granulation methods on anisotropy, pore size and crushing strength of tablets. , 1983, Chemical & pharmaceutical bulletin.

[16]  I. Ward Review: The yield behaviour of polymers , 1971 .

[17]  J. Newton,et al.  Determination of tablet strength by the diametral-compression test. , 1970, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[18]  Eugene Ryshkewitch,et al.  Compression Strength of Porous Sintered Alumina and Zirconia , 1953 .

[19]  G. Bolhuis,et al.  Improving properties of materials for direct compression , 1999 .

[20]  Gerad Klaas Bolhuis,et al.  The effect of viscoelasticity and tabletting speed on consolidation and relaxation of a viscoelastic material , 1996 .

[21]  J. E. Rees,et al.  Some effects of moisture on the viscoelastic behaviour of modified starch during powder compaction , 1994 .

[22]  G. Alderborn,et al.  Studies on direct compression of tablets. XIX. The effect of particle size and shape on the mechanical strength of sodium bicarbonate tablets. , 1988, Acta pharmaceutica Suecica.

[23]  G. Alderborn,et al.  Radial and axial tensile strength and strength variability of paracetamol tablets. , 1984, Acta pharmaceutica Suecica.

[24]  G. Alderborn,et al.  Studies on direct compression of tablets. IV. The effect of particle size on the mechanical strength of tablets. , 1982, Acta pharmaceutica Suecica.

[25]  C. Nyström,et al.  Measurement of axial and radial tensile strength of tablets and their relation to capping. , 1978, Acta pharmaceutica Suecica.

[26]  E. H. Andrews,et al.  Fracture of Polymers , 1972, Nature.

[27]  W. Duckworth Discussion of Ryshkewitch Paper , 1953 .