Automatic Combustion Phase Calibration With Extremum Seeking Approach

One of the most effective factors influencing performance, efficiency, and pollutant emissions of internal combustion engines is the combustion phasing: in gasoline engines electronic control units (ECUs) manage the spark advance (SA) in order to set the optimal combustion phase. Combustion control is assuming a crucial role in reducing engine tailpipe emissions and maximizing performance. The number of actuations influencing the combustion is increasing, and as a consequence, the calibration of control parameters is becoming challenging. One of the most effective factors influencing performance and efficiency is the combustion phasing: for gasoline engines, control variables such as SA, air-to-fuel ratio (AFR), variable valve timing (VVT), and exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) are mostly used to set the combustion phasing. The optimal control setting can be chosen according to a target function (cost or merit function), taking into account performance indicators, such as indicated mean effective pressure (IMEP), brake-specific fuel consumption (BSFC), pollutant emissions, or other indexes inherent to reliability issues, such as exhaust gas temperature or knock intensity. Many different approaches can be used to reach the best calibration settings: design of experiment (DOE) is a common option when many parameters influence the results, but other methodologies are in use: some of them are based on the knowledge of the controlled system behavior by means of models that are identified during the calibration process. The paper proposes the use of a different concept, based on the extremum seeking approach. The main idea consists in changing the values of each control parameter at the same time, identifying its effect on the monitored target function, and allowing to shift automatically the control setting towards the optimum solution throughout the calibration procedure. An original technique for the recognition of control parameters variations effect on the target function is introduced, based on spectral analysis. The methodology has been applied to data referring to different engines and operating conditions, using IMEP, exhaust temperature, and knock intensity for the definition of the target function and using SA and AFR as control variables. The approach proved to be efficient in reaching the optimum control setting, showing that the optimal setting can be achieved rapidly and consistently.

[1]  Andrzej Banaszuk,et al.  Adaptive control of combustion instability using extremum-seeking , 2000, Proceedings of the 2000 American Control Conference. ACC (IEEE Cat. No.00CH36334).

[2]  Enrico Corti,et al.  Spark Advance Real-Time Optimization Based on Combustion Analysis , 2010 .

[3]  Kartik B. Ariyur,et al.  Real-Time Optimization by Extremum-Seeking Control , 2003 .

[4]  Gabriele Serra,et al.  Instantaneous Engine Speed Measurement and Processing for MFB50 Evaluation , 2009 .

[5]  Wouter Caarls,et al.  Comparison of extremum seeking control algorithms for robotic applications , 2012, 2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[6]  Gian Marco Bianchi,et al.  Combined Experimental and Numerical Analysis of the Influence of Air-to-Fuel Ratio on Cyclic Variation of High Performance Engines , 2008 .

[7]  N.J. Killingsworth,et al.  Extremum Seeking Tuning of an Experimental HCCI Engine Combustion Timing Controller , 2007, 2007 American Control Conference.

[8]  Enrico Corti,et al.  Real-Time Evaluation of IMEP and ROHR-related Parameters , 2007 .

[9]  Anthony J. Lawrance,et al.  Engine-mapping experiments: a two-stage regression approach , 1998 .

[10]  Enrico Corti,et al.  Closed-loop individual cylinder air–fuel ratio control via UEGO signal spectral analysis , 2008 .

[11]  Tao Xu,et al.  The engine knock analysis – An overview , 2012 .

[12]  I. Haskara,et al.  Multivariable EGR/spark timing control for IC engines via extremum seeking , 2006, 2006 American Control Conference.

[13]  Enrico Corti,et al.  A Statistical Approach to Spark Advance Mapping , 2010 .

[14]  Erik Hellström,et al.  On-Board Calibration of Spark Timing by Extremum Seeking for Flex-Fuel Engines , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[15]  Andrea Vacca,et al.  A Novel Pressure-Feedback Based Adaptive Control Method to Damp Instabilities in Hydraulic Machines , 2012 .

[16]  Guoming G. Zhu,et al.  On Combustion Invariants for MBT Timing Estimation and Control , 2004 .

[17]  Gary J. Patterson.  A Technique for Processing Cylinder Pressure and Test Bed Data Sets for Engine Speed-Sweep Tests to Allow Reduced Testing Time with Enhanced Interpretation of Results , 2008 .

[18]  Yannis Hardalupas,et al.  Flame chemiluminescence studies of cyclic combustion variations and air-to-fuel ratio of the reacting mixture in a lean-burn stratified-charge spark-ignition engine , 2004 .

[19]  G. Schneider,et al.  Tuning of a combustion controller by extremum seeking: a simulation study , 2000, Proceedings of the 39th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (Cat. No.00CH37187).