Yin-yang : A dialectical approach to total quality management

This paper departs from the consideration of paradox as an organizational phenomenon, supporting the thesis that traditional management (thesis) should meet modern management (antithesis), in order to build a synthesis and not to settle for a solution of compromise. The application of a dialectical perspective to quality management leads to five principles: (1) less inspection in order to promote product quality; (2) control to promote autonomy; (3) authoritative leadership to promote participation; (4) doubt to promote trust; and (5) routine planning to promote creativity. These principles are discussed, leading to the conclusion that the dialectical synthesis resulting from the confrontation between traditional and critical versions of quality management promotes a refreshing view of quality.

[1]  A. Edmondson.  Learning from Mistakes is Easier Said Than Done: Group and Organizational Influences on the Detection and Correction of Human Error , 1996 .

[2]  F. Glen.  The social psychology of organizations , 1976 .

[3]  Rhonda K. Reger,et al.  REFRAMING THE ORGANIZATION: WHY IMPLEMENTING TOTAL QUALITY IS EASIER SAID THAN DONE , 1994 .

[4]  Steven Casper,et al.  Global Quality Norms within National Production Regimes: ISO 9000 Standards in the French and German Car Industries , 1999 .

[5]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Using Paradox to Build Management and Organization Theories , 1989 .

[6]  Charles D. Gevirtz.  Developing New Products With Tqm , 1993 .

[7]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  The Art of Continuous Change : Linking Complexity Theory and Time-Paced Evolution in Relentlessly Shifting Organizations , 1997 .

[8]  J. Dean,et al.  MANAGEMENT THEORY AND TOTAL QUALITY: IMPROVING RESEARCH AND PRACTICE THROUGH THEORY DEVELOPMENT , 1994 .

[9]  Marc J. Epstein,et al.  Using ISO 14000 for improved organizational learning and environmental management , 1997 .

[10]  Carol Reeves,et al.  DEFINING QUALITY: ALTERNATIVES AND IMPLICATIONS , 1994 .

[11]  J. Quelch,et al.  Quality Is More than Making a Good Product , 1983 .

[12]  MIGUEL PINA E CUNHA,et al.  Minimal Network : A Contribution to the Understanding of Control in Trust-Based Organizations , 2003 .

[13]  D. Boje,et al.  The Resurrection of Taylorism: Total Quality Management’s Hidden Agenda , 1993 .

[14]  A. Parasuraman,et al.  A Conceptual Model of Service Quality and Its Implications for Future Research , 1985 .

[15]  W. Bennis,et al.  The Social Psychology of Organizations , 1966 .

[16]  Kenneth R. Thompson.  Confronting the paradoxes in a total quality environment , 1998 .

[17]  Peter J. Brews,et al.  Learning to plan and planning to learn: resolving the planning school/learning school debate , 1999 .

[18]  R. Schroeder,et al.  A THEORY OF QUALITY MANAGEMENT UNDERLYING THE DEMING MANAGEMENT METHOD , 1994 .

[19]  James D. Westphal,et al.  Customization or Conformity? An Institutional and Network Perspective on the Content and Consequences of TQM Adoption , 1997 .

[20]  W. Edwards Deming,et al.  Out of the Crisis , 1982 .

[21]  J. Hackman,et al.  Total Quality Management: Empirical, Conceptual, and Practical Issues , 1995 .

[22]  L. Yorks,et al.  Beyond Total Quality Management: Toward The Emerging Paradigm , 1994 .

[23]  David S. Steingard,et al.  A Postmodern Deconstruction of Total Quality Management (TQM) , 1993 .

[24]  K. Weick,et al.  Organizing for high reliability: Processes of collective mindfulness. , 1999 .

[25]  Ken Kamoche,et al.  Minimal Structures: From Jazz Improvisation to Product Innovation , 2001 .