Partisan patent examiners? Exploring the link between the political ideology of patent examiners and patent office outcomes

[1]  Daniel C. Fehder,et al.  Revealing the Revealed Preferences of Public Firm CEOs and Top Executives: A New Database from Credit Card Spending , 2022, Strategic Management Journal.

[2]  Luis Diestre,et al.  Can Firms Avoid Tough Patent Examiners Through Examiner‐Shopping ? Strategic Timing of Citations in USPTO Patent Applications , 2022, Strategic Management Journal.

[3]  Jacob R. Brown,et al.  The measurement of partisan sorting for 180 million voters , 2021, Nature Human Behaviour.

[4]  Jeffrey M. Kuhn,et al.  The Track One Pilot Program: Who benefits from prioritized patent examination? , 2020, Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal.

[5]  Michael D. Frakes,et al.  Patent Trial and Appeal Board's Consistency-Enhancing Function , 2019 .

[6]  A. Pinsonneault,et al.  Software Patents and Firm Value: A Real Options Perspective on the Role of Innovation Orientation and Environmental Uncertainty , 2019, Inf. Syst. Res..

[7]  Stuart J.H. Graham,et al.  The USPTO Patent Examination Research Dataset: A Window on Patent Processing , 2018, Journal of Economics & Management Strategy.

[8]  Ted Enamorado,et al.  Using a Probabilistic Model to Assist Merging of Large-Scale Administrative Records , 2018, American Political Science Review.

[9]  Gregory N. Mandel,et al.  What Causes Polarization on IP Policy , 2018 .

[10]  James Bessen,et al.  Industry Concentration and Information Technology , 2017, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[11]  M. Sen,et al.  The Legal Academy’s Ideological Uniformity , 2017, The Journal of Legal Studies.

[12]  D. Hambrick,et al.  Evenhandedness in Resource Allocation: Its Relationship with CEO Ideology, Organizational Discretion, and Firm Performance , 2017, Academy of Management Journal.

[13]  Jeffrey M. Kuhn,et al.  How to Measure and Draw Causal Inferences with Patent Scope , 2017, International Journal of the Economics of Business.

[14]  Timothy Simcoe,et al.  Patent Examiner Specialization , 2017, Research Policy.

[15]  Michael D. Frakes,et al.  Is the Time Allocated to Review Patent Applications Inducing Examiners to Grant Invalid Patents? Evidence from Microlevel Application Data , 2017, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[16]  D. Hambrick,et al.  Red, blue, and purple firms: Organizational political ideology and corporate social responsibility , 2017 .

[17]  Alexander Ljungqvist,et al.  What is a Patent Worth? Evidence from the U.S. Patent “Lottery” , 2017, The Journal of Finance.

[18]  Gaétan de Rassenfosse,et al.  Low-Quality Patents in the Eye of the Beholder: Evidence from Multiple Examiners , 2016, The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization.

[19]  Brad N. Greenwood,et al.  Managers’ Political Beliefs and Gender Inequality among Subordinates: Does His Ideology Matter More Than Hers? , 2016 .

[20]  Scott D. Graffin,et al.  Top Management Conservatism and Corporate Risk Strategies: Evidence from Managers' Personal Political Orientation and Corporate Tax Avoidance , 2015 .

[21]  Ivan P. L. Png,et al.  Secrecy and Patents: Theory and Evidence from the Uniform Trade Secrets Act , 2015 .

[22]  Adam Bonica,et al.  The Political Ideologies of American Lawyers , 2015 .

[23]  Joshua A. Tucker,et al.  Tweeting From Left to Right , 2015, Psychological science.

[24]  Gregory N. Mandel,et al.  Intellectual Property Law's Plagiarism Fallacy , 2015 .

[25]  Alfons Palangkaraya,et al.  Patent Examination Outcomes and the National Treatment Principle , 2014, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[26]  Ronald J. Mann.  The Idiosyncrasy of Patent Examiners: Effects of Experience and Attrition , 2014 .

[27]  Adam Bonica.  Mapping the Ideological Marketplace: MAPPING THE IDEOLOGICAL MARKETPLACE , 2014 .

[28]  M. Leiblein,et al.  How Firms Capture Value From Their Innovations , 2013 .

[29]  Adam Bonica.  Ideology and Interests in the Political Marketplace: IDEOLOGY AND INTERESTS IN THE POLITICAL MARKETPLACE , 2013 .

[30]  Gregory N. Mandel.  The Public Perception of Intellectual Property , 2013 .

[31]  Stuart J.H. Graham,et al.  Of Smart Phone Wars and Software Patents , 2013 .

[32]  Mark A. Lemley,et al.  Do Applicant Patent Citations Matter? , 2012 .

[33]  Mark A. Lemley.  Fixing the Patent Office , 2012, Innovation Policy and the Economy.

[34]  Alfons Palangkaraya,et al.  Misclassification between Patent Offices: Evidence from a Matched Sample of Patent Applications , 2011, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[35]  James Bessen.  A Generation of Software Patents , 2011 .

[36]  M. Prior,et al.  You’ve Either Got It or You Don’t? The Stability of Political Interest over the Life Cycle , 2010 .

[37]  Bertram Johnson.  Individual Contributions: A Fundraising Advantage for the Ideologically Extreme? , 2010 .

[38]  Ryan Lampe.  Strategic Citation , 2010, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[39]  Natarajan Balasubramanian,et al.  What Happens When Firms Patent? New Evidence from U.S. Economic Census Data , 2009, The Review of Economics and Statistics.

[40]  Markus Reitzig,et al.  Value Appropriation as an Organizational Capability: The Case of Ip Protection Through Patents , 2009 .

[41]  Matthew J. Sag,et al.  Ideology and Exceptionalism in Intellectual Property: An Empirical Study , 2009 .

[42]  Mark A. Lemley,et al.  Examiner Characteristics and Patent Office Outcomes , 2009, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[43]  Jeffrey M. Kuhn.  Patentable Subject Matter Matters: New Uses for an Old Doctrine , 2008 .

[44]  Ann Bartow.  When Bias is Bipartisan: Teaching about the Democratic Process in an Intellectual Property Law Republic , 2008 .

[45]  Brian A. Nosek,et al.  Ideology Its Resurgence in Social , Personality , and Political Psychology , 2008 .

[46]  Xiaomeng Zhang,et al.  Combining Patent Law Expertise with R&D for Patenting Performance , 2007, Organ. Sci..

[47]  Megan J. MacGarvie,et al.  Patents, Thickets and the Financing of Early-Stage Firms: Evidence from the Software Industry , 2007 .

[48]  Barton Beebe,et al.  An Empirical Study of the Multifactor Tests for Trademark Infringement , 2006 .

[49]  J. Jost.  The end of the end of ideology. , 2006, The American psychologist.

[50]  Megan J. MacGarvie,et al.  The Private Value of Software Patents , 2006 .

[51]  L. Colombo,et al.  Optimal Corporation Tax: An I.O. Approach , 2005 .

[52]  Deepak Somaya,et al.  The Use of Patents, Copyrights and Trademarks in Software: Evidence from Litigation , 2004 .

[53]  Gabriella Coleman.  The Political Agnosticism of Free and Open Source Software and the Inadvertent Politics of Contrast , 2004 .

[54]  James Bessen,et al.  medium provided this notice is preserved. AN EMPIRICAL LOOK AT SOFTWARE PATENTS , 2004 .

[55]  David Schkade,et al.  Ideological Voting on Federal Courts of Appeals: A Preliminary Investigation , 2003 .

[56]  K. Moore.  Are District Court Judges Equipped to Resolve Patent Cases?: 'The Question is Which is to Be Master--That's All' , 2001 .

[57]  D. O. Sears,et al.  Evidence of the Long-Term Persistence of Adults' Political Predispositions , 1999, The Journal of Politics.

[58]  Elhanan Helpman,et al.  Endogenous Innovation in the Theory of Growth , 1993 .

[59]  D. Teece.  Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy , 1993 .

[60]  Margaret A. Peteraf.  The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource‐based view , 1993 .

[61]  K. T. Poole,et al.  Patterns of congressional voting , 1991 .

[62]  P. Romer.  Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth , 1986, Journal of Political Economy.

[63]  K. T. Poole,et al.  A Spatial Model for Legislative Roll Call Analysis , 1985 .

[64]  Ivan P. Fellegi,et al.  A Theory for Record Linkage , 1969 .

[65]  R. Solow.  A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth , 1956 .

[66]  Hannah Mehrle.  Forum Shopping Within the United States Patent and Trademark Office , 2020 .

[67]  Heidi L. Williams,et al.  How Do Patents Affect Follow-on Innovation? Evidence from the Human Genome. , 2019, The American economic review.

[68]  Jaime L. Napier,et al.  Political ideology: its structure, functions, and elective affinities. , 2009, Annual review of psychology.

[69]  Samuel Kortum,et al.  What is behind the recent surge in patenting , 1999 .

[70]  R. Rumelt.  Towards a Strategic Theory of the Firm , 1984 .