Measuring user beliefs and attitudes towards conceptual schemas: tentative factor and structural equation model

Human factors research in conceptual modeling is scarce. Recently, quality assurance frameworks, methods and tools for conceptual schemas have received increased research attention, but the perception of quality by schema users has largely been ignored in this stream of research. This paper proposes a tentative model of user beliefs and attitudes towards the quality of conceptual schemas. The proposed model is original in the sense that it includes both perceived semantic quality and perceived pragmatic quality measures. The paper also presents a new measurement instrument for the perceived semantic quality of conceptual schemas. This instrument was used in a classroom experiment that tested the proposed user beliefs and attitudes model. It was shown that the perceived semantic quality of a schema is directly related to its perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use and indirectly to the user satisfaction with the schema.

[1]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[2]  Cheryl L. Dunn,et al.  An Investigation of Localization as an Element of Cognitive Fit in Accounting Model Representations , 2001, Decis. Sci..

[3]  Ron Weber,et al.  Understanding relationships with attributes in entity-relationship diagrams , 1999, ICIS.

[4]  Geert Poels,et al.  Measuring the Perceived Semantic Quality of Information Models , 2005, ER.

[5]  Young-Gul Kim,et al.  Comparing data modeling formalisms , 1995, CACM.

[6]  Daniel L. Moody,et al.  Comparative Evaluation of Large Data Model Representation Methods: The Analyst's Perspective , 2002, ER.

[7]  Andrew Gemino,et al.  Complexity and clarity in conceptual modeling: Comparison of mandatory and optional properties , 2005, Data Knowl. Eng..

[8]  Cheryl L. Dunn,et al.  Perceived semantic expressiveness of accounting systems and task accuracy effects , 2000, Int. J. Account. Inf. Syst..

[9]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research , 1977 .

[10]  Arne Sølvberg,et al.  Understanding quality in conceptual modeling , 1994, IEEE Software.

[11]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  The Relative Importance of Structural Constraints and Surface Semantics in Information Modeling , 1997, Inf. Syst..

[12]  Keen An Empirical Evaluation of User Information Satisfaction (UIS) Measures for Use with General Ledger Accounting Software I. Introduction , 2002 .

[13]  WandYair,et al.  Complexity and clarity in conceptual modeling , 2005 .

[14]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[15]  Jeffrey Parsons,et al.  Effects of Local Versus Global Schema Diagrams on Verification and Communication in Conceptual Data Modeling , 2002, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[16]  Andrew Gemino,et al.  Evaluating modeling techniques based on models of learning , 2003, CACM.