Predicting Southern Appalachian overstory vegetation with digital terrain data

Vegetation in mountainous regions responds to small-scale variation in terrain, largely due to effects on both temperature and soil moisture. However there are few studies of quantitative, terrain-based methods for predicting vegetation composition. This study investigated relationships between forest composition, elevation, and a derived index of terrain shape, and evaluates methods for predicting forest composition. Trees were measured on 406 permanent plots within the boundaries of the Coweeta Hydrologic Lab, located in the Southern Appalachian Mountains of western North Carolina, USA. All plots were in control watersheds, without human or major natural disturbance since 1923. Plots were 0.08 ha and arrayed on transects, with approximately 380 meters between parallel transects. Breast-height diameters were measured on all trees. Elevation and terrain shape (cove, ridge, sideslope) were estimated for each plot. Density (trees/ha) and basal area were summarized by species and by forest type (cove, xeric oak-pine, northern hardwoods, and mixed deciduous). Plot data were combined with a digital elevation data (DEM), and a derived index of terrain shape at two sampling resolutions: 30 m (US Geological Survey), and 80 m (Defense Mapping Agency) sources. Vegetation maps were produced using each of four different methods: 1) linear regression with and without log transformations against elevation and terrain variables combined with cartographic overlay, 2) kriging, 3) co-kriging, and 4) a mosaic diagram. Predicted vegetation was compared to known vegetation at each of 77 independent, withheld data points, and an error matrix was determined for each mapping method.We observed strong relationships between some species and elevation and/or terrain shape. Cove and xeric oak/pine species basal areas were positively and negatively related to concave landscape locations, respectively, while species typically found in the mixed deciduous and northern hardwood types were not. Most northern hardwood species occurred more frequently and at higher basal areas as elevation increased, while most other species did not respond to elevation. The regression and mosaic diagram mapping approaches had significantly higher mapping accuracies than kriging and co-kriging. There were significant effects of DEM resolution on map accuracy, with maps based on 30 m DEM data significantly more accurate than those based on 80 m data. Taken together, these results indicate that both the mapping method and terrain data resolution significantly affect the resultant vegetation maps, even when using relatively high resolution data. Landscape or regional models based on 100 m or lower resolution terrain data may significantly under-represent terrain-related variation in vegetation composition.

[1]  L. Holdridge.  Determination of World Plant Formations From Simple Climatic Data. , 1947, Science.

[2]  A. Kuchler.  Potential natural vegetation , 1985 .

[3]  J. O. Sawyer,et al.  Vegetation-climate Relationships in the Eastern United States , 1970 .

[4]  Noel A Cressie,et al.  Statistics for Spatial Data. , 1992 .

[5]  P. Pizor.  Principles of Geographical Information Systems for Land Resources Assessment. , 1987 .

[6]  T. C. Nelson.  Chestnut Replacement in the Southern Highlands , 1955 .

[7]  Robert H. Whittaker,et al.  Vegetation of the Great Smoky Mountains , 1956 .

[8]  Wayne T. Swank,et al.  Introduction and Site Description , 1988 .

[9]  G. M. Day.  The Indian as an Ecological Factor in the Northeastern Forest , 1953 .

[10]  J. Vose,et al.  Long-term patterns in vegetation-site relationships in a southern Appalachian forest , 1999 .

[11]  R. Peet.  Forests of the Rocky Mountains , 1988 .

[12]  D. Phillips,et al.  Notes: Effects of Rhododendron (Rhododendron maximum L.) on Regeneration of Southern Appalachian Hardwoods , 1985 .

[13]  J. W. Harshberger.  An Ecologic Study of the Flora of Mountainous North Carolina , 1903, Botanical Gazette.

[14]  R. E. Shanks,et al.  Natural Replacement of Chestnut by Other Species in the Great Smoky Mountains National Park , 1959 .

[15]  P. Bourdeau,et al.  Virgin Hemlock Forest Segregates in the Joyce Kilmer Memorial Forest of Western North Carolina , 1955, Botanical Gazette.

[16]  Andrew K. Skidmore,et al.  A comparison of techniques for calculating gradient and aspect from a gridded digital elevation model , 1989, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[17]  Frank P. Day,et al.  Vegetation Patterns on a Southern Appalachian Watershed , 1974 .

[18]  J. Aber,et al.  A strategy for the regional analysis of the effects of physical and chemical climate change on biogeochemical cycles in northeastern (U.S.) forests , 1993 .

[19]  D. W. Smith,et al.  Soil and plant water stress in an Appalachian oak forest in relation to topography and stand age , 1984, Plant and Soil.

[20]  S. A. Cain.  Ecological Studies of the Vegetation of the Great Smoky Mountains of North Carolina and Tennessee. I. Soil Reaction and Plant Distribution , 1931, Botanical Gazette.

[21]  John M. Crowley,et al.  Küchler, A.Q. Potential Natural Vegetation of the Conterminous United States. American Geographical Society Special Pub. No. 36. New York, American Geographical Society, 1964. Carte accompagnée d’un manuel : illustrations, bibliographie. , 1964 .

[22]  A. W. Küchler.  Potential Natural Vegetation of the Conterminous United States , 1965 .

[23]  J. E. Douglass,et al.  History of Coweeta , 1988 .

[24]  W. Henry McNab,et al.  Terrain shape index: quantifying effect of minor landforms on tree height , 1989 .

[25]  John Pastor,et al.  State-of-the-Art of Models of Production-Decomposition Linkages in Conifer and Grassland Ecosystems. , 1991, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[26]  B. V. Barnes.  Deciduous forests of North America , 1991 .

[27]  R. Bilonick.  An Introduction to Applied Geostatistics , 1989 .

[28]  J. Blaszczyński,et al.  LANDFORM CHARACTERIZATION WITH GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS , 1997 .

[29]  Craig G. Lorimer,et al.  AGE STRUCTURE AND DISTURBANCE HISTORY OF A SOUTHERN APPALACHIAN VIRGIN FOREST , 1980 .

[30]  F. H. Eyre,et al.  Forest cover types of the United States and Canada , 1980 .

[31]  Michael Edward Hohn,et al.  An Introduction to Applied Geostatistics: by Edward H. Isaaks and R. Mohan Srivastava, 1989, Oxford University Press, New York, 561 p., ISBN 0-19-505012-6, ISBN 0-19-505013-4 (paperback), $55.00 cloth, $35.00 paper (US) , 1991 .

[32]  F. P. Day,et al.  Forest Communities and Patterns , 1988 .

[33]  L. Swift,et al.  Climatology and Hydrology , 1988 .

[34]  R. Hatcher.  Bedrock Geology and Regional Geologic Setting of Coweeta Hydrologic Laboratory in the Eastern Blue Ridge , 1988 .

[35]  James R. Runkle,et al.  PATTERNS OF DISTURBANCE IN SOME OLD-GROWTH MESIC FORESTS OF EASTERN NORTH AMERICA' , 1982 .

[36]  G. E. Nichols.  The Hemlock--White Pine--Northern Hardwood Region of Eastern North America , 1935 .

[37]  M. S. Golden.  An Integrated Multivariate Analysis of Forest Communities of the Central Great Smoky Mountains , 1981 .

[38]  Robert G. Bailey,et al.  Ecosystem Geography , 1996, Springer New York.

[39]  V. M. Conway,et al.  Deciduous Forests of Eastern North America. , 1951 .