Finite element analysis of confined turbulent swirling flows

The finite element method is applied to incompressible and statistically steady confined turbulent swirling flows. A velocity–pressure formulation is employed. The momentum and continuity equations are solved using a segregated algorithm. Two turbulence models, namely the standard κ–e model and the algebraic stress model, are considered. It is shown that the algebraic stress model leads to significantly more accurate results in swirling flows compared to the κ–e model. A novel way of implementing the algebraic stress model is presented in which the stresses are coupled to the Navier–Stokes equations in such a way that they ‘correct’ the effective viscosity hypothesis. This formulation seems to provide a convenient approach for finite elements. In deriving the discretization equations, a streamline-upwind/Petrov–Galerkin method is employed. Comparisons performed between various upwind schemes show that the numerical solution may be substantially affected by the particular upwind procedure used. The analysis is extended to the prediction of particle motion in turbulent swirling flow fields. Here the fluid turbulence is modelled adopting a stochastic approach. The influence of turbulence modelling on particle movement is investigated.

[1]  Kwang‐Yong Kim,et al.  New eddy viscosity model for computation of swirling turbulent flows , 1987 .

[2]  T. Hughes,et al.  A new finite element formulation for computational fluid dynamics: II. Beyond SUPG , 1986 .

[3]  Philip J. Smith,et al.  Modeling of swirl in turbulent flow systems , 1986 .

[4]  ShakibFarzin,et al.  A new finite element formulation for computational fluid dynamics , 1991 .

[5]  Thomas J. R. Hughes,et al.  A simple scheme for developing ‘upwind’ finite elements , 1978 .

[6]  Ali Cemal Benim,et al.  Investigation into the finite element analysis of confined turbulent flows using a κ-ε model of turbulence☆ , 1985 .

[7]  Hans Edelmann,et al.  Vier Woodbury-Formeln hergeleitet aus dem Variablentausch einer speziellen Matrix , 1976 .

[8]  S. Patankar Numerical Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow , 2018, Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering.

[9]  F. Durst,et al.  Eulerian and Lagrangian predictions of particulate two phase flows , 1984 .

[10]  Wolfgang Rodi,et al.  Computation of strongly swirling axisymmetric free jets , 1984 .

[11]  A. Benim Finite element solution of an enclosed turbulent diffusion flame , 1989 .

[12]  R. M. Smith,et al.  The computation of turbulent flows of industrial complexity by the finite element method—progress and prospects , 1987 .

[13]  U. Schnell,et al.  Some remarks on the PISO and SIMPLE algorithms for steady turbulent flow problems , 1989 .

[14]  B. Launder,et al.  Numerical Prediction of Axisymmetric Free Shear Flows with a Reynolds Stress Closure , 1979 .

[15]  J. L. Sohn,et al.  Evaluation of FIDAP on some classical laminar and turbulent benchmarks. [FluId Dynamics Analysis Package , 1988 .

[16]  W. Rodi A new algebraic relation for calculating the Reynolds stresses , 1976 .

[17]  R. J. Schnipke,et al.  A monotone streamline upwind finite element method for convection-dominated flows , 1985 .

[18]  Ali Cemal Benim,et al.  A segregated formulation of Navier-Stokes equations with finite elements , 1986 .

[19]  A. Benim,et al.  Investigation into the finite element analysis of enclosed turbulent diffusion flames , 1989 .

[20]  B. Launder,et al.  Mathematical Models of turbulence , 1972 .