Quasi-steady acoustic response of wall perforations subject to a grazing-bias flow combination

Abstract Well known examples of acoustical dampers are the aero-engine liners, the IC-engine exhaust mufflers, and the liners in combustion chambers. These devices comprise wall perforations, responsible for their sound absorbing features. Understanding the effect of the flow on the acoustic properties of a perforation is essential for the design of acoustic dampers. In the present work the effect of a grazing-bias flow combination on the impedance of slit shaped wall perforations is experimentally investigated by means of a multi-microphone impedance tube. Measurements are carried out for perforation geometries relevant for in technical applications. The focus of the experiments is on the low Strouhal number (quasi-steady) behavior. Analytical models of the steady flow and of the low frequency aeroacoustic behavior of a two-dimensional wall perforation are proposed for the case of a bias flow directed from the grazing flow towards the opposite side of the perforated wall. These theoretical results compare favorably with the experiments, when a semi-empirical correction is used to obtain the correct limit for pure bias flow.

[1]  Mats Åbom,et al.  Quasi-steady model of the acoustic scattering properties of a T-junction , 2011 .

[2]  Don D Davis,et al.  Theoretical and experimental investigation of mufflers with comments on engine-exhaust muffler design , 1952 .

[3]  Mats Åbom,et al.  Influence of errors on the two‐microphone method for measuring acoustic properties in ducts , 1986 .

[4]  M. Salikuddin,et al.  Acoustic power dissipation on radiation through duct terminations - Experiments , 1981 .

[5]  A Avraham Hirschberg,et al.  Aeroacoustic response of a slit-shaped diaphragm in a pipe at low Helmholtz number, 2 : Unsteady results , 2001 .

[6]  D. W. Bechert,et al.  Sound absorption caused by vorticity shedding, demonstrated with a jet flow☆ , 1980 .

[7]  Jeff D. Eldredge,et al.  Numerical investigation of the acoustic behavior of a multi-perforated liner , 2007 .

[8]  Ann P. Dowling,et al.  Tuned Passive Control of Acoustic Damping of Perforated Liners , 2011 .

[9]  A. F. Charwat,et al.  Correlation of the effects of grazing flow on the impedance of Helmholtz resonators , 1982 .

[10]  Mats Åbom,et al.  Aeroacoustics of T-junctions : An experimental investigation , 2010 .

[11]  Michael S. Howe INFLUENCE OF WALL THICKNESS ON RAYLEIGH CONDUCTIVITY AND FLOW-INDUCED APERTURE TONES , 1997 .

[12]  G. Garrison The role of acoustic absorbers in preventing combustion instability , 1971 .

[13]  M. L. Munjal,et al.  Acoustics of Ducts and Mufflers , 2014 .

[14]  Mats Åbom,et al.  Error analysis of two‐microphone measurements in ducts with flow , 1988 .

[15]  Gcj Geert Hofmans,et al.  Vortex sound in confined flows , 1998 .

[16]  M. S. Howe Acoustics of fluid-structure interactions , 1998 .

[17]  A Avraham Hirschberg,et al.  A Semi-analytical Model for Perforated Pipe Mufflers , 2008 .

[18]  R. Blevins Applied Fluid Dynamics Handbook , 1984 .

[19]  M. S. Howe,et al.  The influence of tangential mean flow on the Rayleigh conductivity of an aperture , 1996, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[20]  Xianfang Sun,et al.  EFFECT OF GRAZING–BIAS FLOW INTERACTION ON ACOUSTIC IMPEDANCE OF PERFORATED PLATES , 2002 .

[21]  Y. Aurégan,et al.  Quasisteady aero-acoustic response of orifices. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  Wei Na,et al.  SIMULATIONS OF THE SCATTERING OF SOUND WAVES AT A SUDDEN AREA EXPANSION IN A 3D DUCT , 2012 .

[23]  A Avraham Hirschberg,et al.  Damping and reflection coefficient measurements for an open pipe at low Mach and low Helmholtz numbers , 1993, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[24]  U. Ingard,et al.  Acoustic Nonlinearity of an Orifice , 1967 .

[25]  A Avraham Hirschberg,et al.  The whistling potentiality of an orifice in a confined flow using an energetic criterion , 2009 .

[26]  A. Cummings The response of a resonator under a turbulent boundary layer to a high amplitude non-harmonic sound field☆ , 1987 .

[27]  Xiaodong Jing,et al.  Effect of Plate Thickness on Impedance of Perforated Plates with Bias Flow , 2000 .

[28]  Gunilla Efraimsson,et al.  A frequency domain linearized Navier-Stokes equations approach to acoustic propagation in flow ducts with sharp edges. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[29]  Edward J. Rice Model for the Acoustic Impedance of a Perforated Plate Liner with Multiple Frequency Excitation , 1972 .

[30]  Mats Åbom,et al.  Measurement of the scattering-matrix of acoustical two-ports , 1991 .

[31]  E. J. Rice,et al.  Visual study of the effect of grazing flow on the oscillatory flow in a resonator orifice , 1975 .

[32]  Walter Eversman,et al.  High Amplitude Acoustic Transmission Through Duct Terminations: Theory , 1983 .

[33]  Sheryl M. Grace,et al.  The influence of shape on the rayleigh conductivity of a wall aperture in the presence of grazing flow , 1998 .

[34]  A. Hirschberg,et al.  Acoustical response of orifices under grazing flow: Effect of boundary layer profile and edge geometry , 2008 .

[35]  Xiaodong Jing,et al.  Effect of Grazing Flow on the Acoustic Impedance of an Orifice , 2001 .

[36]  O. Tietjens,et al.  Fundamentals of hydro- and aeromechanics , 1934 .

[37]  M. S. Howe,et al.  On the theory of unsteady high Reynolds number flow through a circular aperture , 1979, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.