Different dynamic causal relationship approaches for cognitive maps

We study in this work the problem of adaptation on cognitive maps (CMs). We review different approaches of adaptation for CM, based on the idea that the causal relationships of the CM change during their phase of execution (runtime). Particularly, we study three dynamic causal relationships: the first one where the relationships between the concepts are defined as fuzzy rules, and the concepts and the relationship are fuzzy variables; the second one where mathematical models that describe the real system are used to define the causal relationships; and finally, in the last one the causal relationships are defined by generic logic rules based on the state of the concepts of the map. Each one can be used to model different types of systems, because each one exploits specific characteristics of the modeled system. These approaches are tested in different problems, giving very good results, and demonstrating that the utilization of CM as dynamic models is reliable and good.

[1]  Francklin Rivas,et al.  A Multiagent Model for Intelligent Distributed Control Systems , 2005, KES.

[2]  Javad Jassbi,et al.  Adaptive Fuzzy Cognitive Maps for Identification of Cause and Effect , 2011, 2011 Third International Conference on Computational Intelligence, Communication Systems and Networks.

[3]  José Tomé,et al.  Rule Based Fuzzy Cognitive Maps: Fuzzy Causal Relations , 2002 .

[4]  Chrysostomos D. Stylios,et al.  Active Hebbian learning algorithm to train fuzzy cognitive maps , 2004, Int. J. Approx. Reason..

[5]  Aguilar Jose,et al.  Dynamic Fuzzy Cognitive Maps for the Supervision of Multiagent Systems , 2010 .

[6]  Goutam Banerjee,et al.  Adaptive fuzzy cognitive maps vs neutrosophic cognitive maps: decision support tool for knowledge based institutions , 2008 .

[7]  José Aguilar,et al.  Adaptive Random Fuzzy Cognitive Maps , 2002, IBERAMIA.

[8]  Chrysostomos D. Stylios,et al.  Unsupervised learning techniques for fine-tuning fuzzy cognitive map causal links , 2006, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[9]  José Aguilar-Castro,et al.  Agents-based design for fault management systems in industrial processes , 2007, Comput. Ind..

[10]  Witold Pedrycz,et al.  Genetic learning of fuzzy cognitive maps , 2005, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[11]  Lúcia Valéria Ramos de Arruda,et al.  A Combined FCM-GA Approach to Supervise Industrial Process , 2009 .

[12]  Jose Aguilar,et al.  A DYNAMIC FUZZY-COGNITIVE-MAP APPROACH BASED ON RANDOM NEURAL NETWORKS , 2003 .

[13]  R. Axelrod Structure of decision : the cognitive maps of political elites , 2015 .

[14]  Alberto Vázquez Huerga A Balanced Differential Learning algorithm in Fuzzy Cognitive Maps , 2002 .

[15]  B. Kosko Fuzzy Thinking: The New Science of Fuzzy Logic , 1993 .

[16]  Michael N. Vrahatis,et al.  Fuzzy Cognitive Maps Learning through Swarm Intelligence , 2004, ICAISC.

[17]  Witold Pedrycz,et al.  Learning fuzzy cognitive maps with required precision using genetic algorithm approach , 2004 .

[18]  Alicja Wakulicz-Deja,et al.  Mining temporal medical data using adaptive fuzzy cognitive maps , 2009, 2009 2nd Conference on Human System Interactions.

[19]  Przemyslaw Juszczuk,et al.  Predictive Capabilities of Adaptive and Evolutionary Fuzzy Cognitive Maps - A Comparative Study , 2009, Intelligent Systems for Knowledge Management.

[20]  Aguilar Jose,et al.  The FCM Designer Tool , 2010 .

[21]  P. A. Dávila,et al.  Simulación del Proceso de Producción del Éter Etil Tert-Butílico (ETBE): Influencia de la Relación Etanol/Isobuteno , 2004 .

[22]  Bart Kosko,et al.  Fuzzy Cognitive Maps , 1986, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[23]  Bart Kosko,et al.  Fuzzy Engineering , 1996 .