Measurement of respiratory acoustic signals. Effect of microphone air cavity width, shape, and venting.

STUDY OBJECTIVE We have previously investigated the effects of microphone type and coupler air chamber depth on lung sound characteristics. We now report the results of experiments exploring the effects of air chamber width, shape, and venting on lung sounds. DESIGN We used a single electret microphone with a variety of plastic couplers. The couplers were identical except for the diameter and shape of the air chamber. We used cylindrical chambers of 5, 10, and 15 mm in diameter at the skin and conical chambers of 8, 10, and 15 mm in diameter. We compared the inspiratory lung sound spectra obtained using each of the couplers. We also examined the tendency of various needle vents to transmit ambient noise into the microphone chamber. SETTING Anechoic chamber. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS The shape and diameter had little important effect on the lung sound spectrum below 500 Hz. From approximately 500 to 1,500 Hz, the 5-mm diameter couplers showed slightly less sensitivity than the 10- and 15-mm diameter couplers. All conical couplers provided approximately 5 to 10 decibel more sensitivity than the cylindrical couplers. All vents allowed some ambient noise to enter the chamber but the amount was trivial using the narrowest, longest vent. CONCLUSIONS These data suggest that the optimal electret microphone coupler chamber for lung sound acquisition should be conical in shape, between 10 and 15 mm in diameter at the skin, and either not vented or vented with a tube no wider than 23-g or shorter than 20 mm.

[1]  G R Wodicka,et al.  Measurement of respiratory acoustic signals. Effect of microphone air cavity depth. , 1994, Chest.

[2]  S. Kraman,et al.  Determination of the site of production of respiratory sounds by subtraction phonopneumography. , 2015, The American review of respiratory disease.

[3]  H. Pasterkamp,et al.  Measurement of respiratory acoustical signals. Comparison of sensors. , 1993, Chest.

[4]  S. Kraman New Tools in Lung Sound Research , 1985 .

[5]  J. Racineux,et al.  An accurate recording system and its use in breath sounds spectral analysis. , 1983, Journal of applied physiology: respiratory, environmental and exercise physiology.

[6]  S. Kraman,et al.  Does the vesicular lung sound come only from the lungs? , 1983, The American review of respiratory disease.

[7]  P. Macklem,et al.  Breath sounds and regional ventilation. , 1977, The American review of respiratory disease.

[8]  N Gavriely,et al.  Spectral characteristics of normal breath sounds. , 1981, Journal of applied physiology: respiratory, environmental and exercise physiology.

[9]  K. Stevens,et al.  Spectral characteristics of sound transmission in the human respiratory system , 1990, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[10]  S. Kraman,et al.  Effects of lung volume and airflow on the frequency spectrum of vesicular lung sounds. , 1986, Respiration physiology.

[11]  S. Kraman,et al.  The relationship between airflow and lung sound amplitude in normal subjects. , 1984, Chest.

[12]  S. Kraman,et al.  Vesicular lung sound amplitude mapping by automated flow-gated phonopneumography. , 1982, Journal of applied physiology: respiratory, environmental and exercise physiology.

[13]  R. Murphy,et al.  Auscultation of the lung: past lessons, future possibilities. , 1981, Thorax.

[14]  V Chernick,et al.  Spectral analysis of breath sounds in normal newborn infants. , 1983, Medical instrumentation.

[15]  J B Grotberg,et al.  Measurement and theory of wheezing breath sounds. , 1984, Journal of applied physiology: respiratory, environmental and exercise physiology.

[16]  P. Macklem,et al.  Breath sounds and distribution of pulmonary ventilation. , 1970, The American review of respiratory disease.