To Sign Up, or not to Sign Up?: Maximizing Citizen Science Contribution Rates through Optional Registration

Many citizen science projects ask people to create an account before they participate - some require it. What effect does the registration process have on the number and quality of contributions? We present a controlled study comparing the effects of mandatory registration with an interface that enables people to participate without registering, but allows them to sign up to 'claim' contributions. We demonstrate that removing the requirement to register increases the number of visitors to the site contributing to the project by 62%, without reducing data quality. We also discover that contribution rates are the same for people who choose to register, and those who remain anonymous, indicating that the interface should cater for differences in participant motivation. The study provides evidence that to maximize contribution rates, projects should offer the option to create an account, but the process should not be a barrier to immediate contribution, nor should it be required.

[1]  T. Kornienko,et al.  Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization , 2022 .

[2]  Loren G. Terveen,et al.  Quality is a verb: the operationalization of data quality in a citizen science community , 2011, Int. Sym. Wikis.

[3]  Jennifer Preece,et al.  Using gamification to inspire new citizen science volunteers , 2013, Gamification.

[4]  Margot Brereton,et al.  Virtual birding: extending an environmental pastime into the virtual world for citizen science , 2013, CHI.

[5]  Ann Blandford,et al.  Designing for dabblers and deterring drop-outs in citizen science , 2014, CHI.

[6]  Ya'akov Gal,et al.  Improving Productivity in Citizen Science through Controlled Intervention , 2015, WWW.

[7]  David Coyle,et al.  Competing or aiming to be average?: normification as a means of engaging digital volunteers , 2014, CSCW.

[8]  Andrea Wiggins,et al.  Free as in puppies: compensating for ict constraints in citizen science , 2013, CSCW.

[9]  Charlene Jennett,et al.  Do games attract or sustain engagement in citizen science?: a study of volunteer motivations , 2013, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[10]  Kevin Crowston,et al.  Purposeful gaming & socio-computational systems: a citizen science design case , 2012, GROUP.

[11]  P. Resnick,et al.  Building Successful Online Communities: Evidence-Based Social Design , 2012 .

[12]  Loren G. Terveen,et al.  Crafting the initial user experience to achieve community goals , 2008, RecSys '08.

[13]  Ron Kohavi,et al.  Responsible editor: R. Bayardo. , 2022 .

[14]  Jennifer Preece,et al.  Gamifying citizen science: a study of two user groups , 2014, CSCW Companion.

[15]  James W. Pennebaker,et al.  Predicting the perceived quality of online mathematics contributions from users' reputations , 2011, CHI.

[16]  Marti A. Hearst,et al.  Comparing the use of social networking and traditional media channels for promoting citizen science , 2013, CSCW.

[17]  Jennifer Preece,et al.  Does motivation in citizen science change with time and culture? , 2014, CSCW Companion.

[18]  Jon Whittle,et al.  How much participation is enough?: a comparison of six participatory design projects in terms of outcomes , 2014, PDC.

[19]  David De Roure,et al.  Zooniverse: observing the world's largest citizen science platform , 2014, WWW.

[20]  Matthew Reid,et al.  Quality control mechanisms for crowdsourcing: peer review, arbitration, & expertise at familysearch indexing , 2013, CSCW '13.

[21]  Jennifer Preece,et al.  Dynamic changes in motivation in collaborative citizen-science projects , 2012, CSCW.

[22]  Loren G. Terveen,et al.  Capturing quality: retaining provenance for curated volunteer monitoring data , 2014, CSCW.

[23]  David P. Anderson,et al.  Scientists@Home: What Drives the Quantity and Quality of Online Citizen Science Participation? , 2014, PloS one.

[24]  Anna L. Cox,et al.  “I want to be a captain! I want to be a captain!”: gamification in the old weather citizen science project , 2013, Gamification.

[25]  Laura A. Dabbish,et al.  Labeling images with a computer game , 2004, AAAI Spring Symposium: Knowledge Collection from Volunteer Contributors.

[26]  Ron Kohavi,et al.  Ten Supplementary Analyses to Improve E-commerce Web Sites , 2003 .

[27]  Arpita Ghosh,et al.  Incentives, gamification, and game theory: an economic approach to badge design , 2013, EC '13.

[28]  Scott E. Hudson,et al.  DIYbio Things: Open Source Biology Tools as Platforms for Hybrid Knowledge Production and Scientific Participation , 2015, CHI.

[29]  Michael S. Bernstein,et al.  Break It Down: A Comparison of Macro- and Microtasks , 2015, CHI.

[30]  C. Lintott,et al.  Galaxy Zoo: morphologies derived from visual inspection of galaxies from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey , 2008, 0804.4483.

[31]  Nicole Immorlica,et al.  Social Status and Badge Design , 2015, WWW.

[32]  Elena Paslaru Bontas Simperl,et al.  Designing for Citizen Data Analysis: A Cross-Sectional Case Study of a Multi-Domain Citizen Science Platform , 2015, CHI.

[33]  Kevin Crowston,et al.  From Conservation to Crowdsourcing: A Typology of Citizen Science , 2011, 2011 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[34]  Adrien Treuille,et al.  Predicting protein structures with a multiplayer online game , 2010, Nature.

[35]  L. Festinger,et al.  A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance , 2017 .