Reducing the uncertainty in indirect estimates of extreme flash flood discharges

Direct current meter measurements are rarely available for extreme flash floods. Corresponding discharges are generally estimated using so-called “indirect” techniques such as the slope – area method. These methods are based on empirical hydraulic formulae that typically use Manning’s equation, and have been calibrated and also widely tested for flow conditions that differ significantly from those encountered during flash floods. Recent work conducted in Europe, as part of the HYDRATE research project and other studies, has shown that the use of these formulae and their associated tabulated roughness values available in current guidance documents, without further verification, can lead to over-estimates of peak discharges in the case of flash floods. After having discussed the limitations of indirect methods based on Manning’s formula, the paper illustrates how the uncertainty in indirect discharge estimates can be reduced through the analysis of various types of data that can be collected during post-event surveys and through consistency checks. Based on a review of current literature and on recent flash flood studies, this paper proposes simple guidelines to assist practitioners in estimating extreme discharges during post-event surveys.

[1]  Donald W. Knight,et al.  Practical Channel Hydraulics: Roughness, Conveyance and Afflux , 2009 .

[2]  John E. Costa,et al.  A comparison of the largest rainfall-runoff floods in the United States with those of the People's Republic of China and the world , 1987 .

[3]  D. M. Hicks,et al.  Roughness Characteristics of New Zealand Rivers , 1998 .

[4]  María del Carmen Llasat Botija,et al.  Estimation of the extreme flash flood evolution in Barcelona county from 1351 to 2005 , 2006 .

[5]  J. Rodier World catalogue of maximum observed floods , 1984 .

[6]  D. J. Trieste Evaluation of Supercritical/Subcritical Flows in High‐Gradient Channel , 1992 .

[7]  Smith Square Dean Stanley Reducing Uncertainty in River Flood Conveyance , 2003 .

[8]  J. T. Limerinos Determination of the manning coefficient from measured bed roughness in natural channels , 1970 .

[9]  A. Stohl,et al.  Climatological aspects of the extreme European rainfall of August 2002 and a trajectory method for estimating the associated evaporative source regions , 2004 .

[10]  Kazuhiko Fukami,et al.  Current Status of River Discharge Observation Using Non-Contact Current Meter for Operational Use in Japan , 2008 .

[11]  M. A. Benson,et al.  Measurement of peak discharge by the slope-area method , 1968 .

[12]  R. Herschy The world’s maximum observed floods , 2002 .

[13]  Günter Blöschl,et al.  A compilation of data on European flash floods , 2009 .

[14]  P. O. Wolf,et al.  THE LYNMOUTH FLOOD OF AUGUST 1952. , 1953 .

[15]  José I. Barredo,et al.  Major flood disasters in Europe: 1950–2005 , 2007 .

[16]  J. V. Sutcliffe,et al.  Regional flood frequency analysis in arid and semi-arid areas , 1992 .

[17]  Sarah Whatmore,et al.  Manning's n - putting roughness to work , 2010 .

[18]  Jeff V. Phillips,et al.  Verification of Roughness Coefficients for Selected Natural and Constructed Stream Channels in Arizona , 1998 .

[19]  M. Llasat,et al.  Estimation of extreme flash flood evolution in Barcelona County from 1351 to 2005 , 2006 .

[20]  F. Santa,et al.  ROUGHNESS COEFFICIENT IN MOUNTAIN RIVERS , 1994 .

[21]  M. Borga,et al.  Characterisation of selected extreme flash floods in Europe and implications for flood risk management , 2010 .

[22]  T. Pierson Distinguishing between debris flows and floods from field evidence in small watersheds , 2005 .

[23]  R. D. Jarrett DETERMINATION OF ROUGHNESS COEFFICIENTS FOR STREAMS IN COLORADO , 1985 .

[24]  Faisal Hossain,et al.  Hydrological model sensitivity to parameter and radar rainfall estimation uncertainty , 2004 .

[25]  R. D. Jarrett,et al.  Roughness Coefficients of Large Floods , 1987 .

[26]  U. Ulbrich,et al.  The central European floods of August 2002: Part 1 – Rainfall periods and flood development , 2003 .

[27]  V. R. Schneider,et al.  GUIDE FOR SELECTING MANNING'S ROUGHNESS COEFFICIENTS FOR NATURAL CHANNELS AND FLOOD PLAINS , 1989 .

[28]  R. D. Jarrett Hydraulics of High-Gradient Streams , 1984 .

[29]  J. Costa,et al.  An Evaluation of Selected Extraordinary Floods in the United States Reported by the U.S. Geological Survey and Implications for Future Advancement of Flood Science , 2008 .

[30]  Pierre Y. Julien,et al.  Mean Velocity of Mudflows and Debris Flows , 2010 .

[31]  P. House,et al.  A geomorphologic and hydrologic evaluation of an extraordinary flood discharge estimate: Bronco Creek, Arizona , 1995 .

[32]  H. Chanson Critical Flow Constrains Flow Hydraulics in Mobile-Bed Streams : a New Hypothesis , 1999 .

[33]  Eric Gaume,et al.  Post‐flood field investigations in upland catchments after major flash floods: proposal of a methodology and illustrations , 2008 .

[34]  K. Tinkler,et al.  Critical Flow in Rockbed Streams with Estimated Values for Manning's n , 1997 .

[35]  M. S. Morgan,et al.  How Well Do Facts Travel , 2011 .

[36]  Konstantine P. Georgakakos,et al.  On the design of national, real-time-warning systems with capability for site-specific, flash-flood forecasts , 1986 .

[37]  S. Yochum,et al.  Case Study of the Big Bay Dam Failure: Accuracy and Comparison of Breach Predictions , 2008 .

[38]  H. Barnes Roughness characteristics of natural channels , 1967 .

[39]  R. D. Jarrett Errors in slope-area computations of peak discharges in mountain streams , 1987 .

[40]  D. B. Simons,et al.  Hydraulics of mountain rivers , 2007 .

[41]  Lorenzo Marchi,et al.  Measurements of debris flow velocity through cross-correlation of instrumentation data , 2005 .

[42]  D. F. Gillen DETERMINATION OF ROUGHNESS COEFFICIENTS FOR STREAMS IN WEST-CENTRAL FLORIDA , 1996 .

[43]  W. Coon Estimation of roughness coefficients for natural stream channels with vegetated banks , 2012 .

[44]  Ethan T Knocke,et al.  Flash Flood Awareness in Southwest Virginia , 2007, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[45]  Marco Borga,et al.  Regional frequency analysis of extreme precipitation in the eastern Italian Alps and the August 29, 2003 flash flood , 2007 .

[46]  Paul M. Santi,et al.  A study of methods to estimate debris flow velocity , 2008 .

[47]  D. Ledger The velocity of the River Tweed and its tributaries , 1981 .

[48]  Eric Gaume,et al.  Hydrological analysis of the river Aude, France, flash flood on 12 and 13 November 1999 , 2004 .

[49]  Eric Gaume,et al.  Surveying flash floods: gauging the ungauged extremes , 2008 .

[50]  Travis M. Smith,et al.  Remote collection and analysis of witness reports on flash floods , 2010 .

[51]  C. Hunt Encyclopedia of Paleoclimatology and Ancient Environments , 2009 .

[52]  Research Note: Use of a distributed erosion model (AGNPS) for planning small reservoirs in the Upper Torysa basin , 2004 .

[53]  M. Davison,et al.  Two dimensional model analysis of flash‐flood processes: application to the Boscastle event , 2010 .

[54]  Robert H. Webb,et al.  One‐Dimensional Estimation Techniques for Discharges of Paleofloods and Historical Floods , 2013 .

[55]  V. T. Chow Open-channel hydraulics , 1959 .

[56]  B. Golding METEOROLOGY OF THE BOSCASTLE FLOOD , 2005 .