Task Decomposition and Grouping for Customer Collaboration in Product Development

Abstract Decomposing product development project into various tasks and grouping them are important activities in product development. Many scholars devoted their efforts to solving this problem and proposed some useful methods. However, the research work of task decomposition and grouping for customer collaboration in product development is still lacking. Therefore, this study first decomposes product development tasks and analyzes its executability. Then, by using an integrated numerical design structure matrix and adaptive genetic algorithm (AGA) approach, tasks are divided into different groups, tasks in the same group have high correlation degree, and tasks in the different groups have low correlation degree. To illustrate the process of task decomposition and grouping methods proposed in this paper, a mobile phone structural development case is applied. Moreover, standard generic algorithm (SGA) and particle swarm optimization (PSO) are used to compare with AGA to verify the effectiveness of AGA.

[1]  Gülçin Büyüközkan,et al.  Collaborative product development: a literature overview , 2012 .

[2]  W. Qualls,et al.  The Interplay of Customer and Product Innovation Dynamics: An Exploratory Study , 2010 .

[3]  Dan Braha,et al.  PARTITIONING TASKS TO PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT TEAMS , 2002 .

[4]  Vasile Zecheru,et al.  Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) in Project Management , 2016 .

[5]  P. Ahmed,et al.  From product innovation to solutions innovation: a new paradigm for competitive advantage , 2000 .

[6]  Ä KlasOrsv Some principles for libraries of task decomposition methods , 1998 .

[7]  Yang,et al.  Ontology-based Multi-perspective Task Decomposition to Support Composite Manufacturing Service Discovery , 2011 .

[8]  Ke Ying-lin,et al.  Task planning and decoupling strategy for collaborative design , 2006 .

[9]  Li Lin,et al.  Decomposition of interdependent task group for concurrent engineering , 2003 .

[10]  Lars Bo Jeppesen,et al.  Consumers as Co-developers: Learning and Innovation Outside the Firm , 2003, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[11]  Mark R. Cutkosky,et al.  Framework for Modeling Dependencies in Collaborative Engineering Processes , 1999 .

[12]  Wang Yuefei Partner selection solving based on a self-adaptive genetic algorithm for virtual enterprise , 2008 .

[13]  John Cullen,et al.  Democratizing Innovation , 2020, Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation and Entrepreneurship.

[14]  An Li-ping A Double Population Self-adaptive Genetic Algorithm for Partner Selection of Virtual Enterprise , 2006 .

[15]  Steven D. Eppinger,et al.  Integration analysis of product decompositions , 1994 .

[16]  Xionghui Zhou STUDY ON TASK PLAN ALGORITHM FOR INJECTION PRODUCT AND MOLD COLLABORATIVE DESIGN , 2003 .

[17]  D. Lei,et al.  Collaborative Innovation with Customers: A Review of the Literature and Suggestions for Future Research , 2012 .

[18]  Chen Xindu Team Structure Faced Coupling Task Group Decomposition and Simulation , 2008 .

[19]  Johann Füller,et al.  A Manager's Perspective on Virtual Customer Integration for New Product Development , 2012 .

[20]  Klas Orsvä Some principles for libraries of task decomposition methods , 1998, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[21]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II , 2002, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[22]  Yu Yang,et al.  Task allocation optimization in collaborative customized product development based on double-population adaptive genetic algorithm , 2016, J. Intell. Manuf..

[23]  S. N. Sivanandam,et al.  Genetic Algorithm Optimization Problems , 2008 .

[24]  D. V. Steward,et al.  The design structure system: A method for managing the design of complex systems , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[25]  Andrew Kusiak,et al.  Efficient organizing of design activities , 1993 .

[26]  Chunyu Bao,et al.  Task Decomposition Using Pattern Distributor , 2004 .

[27]  Wayne D. Hoyer,et al.  Consumer Cocreation in New Product Development , 2010 .

[28]  Sari Kujala,et al.  User involvement: A review of the benefits and challenges , 2003, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[29]  Wen Zhi-jia Design task decomposition and allocation for inter-firm product collaborative development , 2007 .