Extreme ultraviolet lithography is one of the promising high volume manufacturing processes for devices below 7 nm node and beyond. However, resist pattern collapse is one of the hurdles in achieving a comfortable process margin/window for resist patterning. To suppress this resist pattern collapse and to improve manufacturing process margin, undoubtedly it is a well-known fact that the rinse materials can mitigate a pattern collapse at development process. In this study, we focus on the relationship between resist swelling and pattern collapse, based on the assumption of resist pattern softening induced by resist swelling and further resist pattern bending or deformation which could be classified as pattern collapse. To verify this model, two samples of Rinse-A and Rinse-B which showed similar capillary force but different resist swelling behavior expected, respectively, were prepared. And the hardness of the resist films treated using those rinse materials together with de-ionized water as reference rinse, were measured using nano-indentation measurement technique. From the result, it was found that Rinse-A had the resist film hardness reduced by 7.9 % as compared to that on de-ionized water. On the other hand, Rinse-B which was designed to suppress the penetration of additives into the resist film, exhibited comparable hardness property to that on reference rinse, de-ionized water. Finally, the evaluation of lithographic performance of the photoresist in different rinse process conditions using Rinse-A and Rinse-B was carried out, and Rinse- B achieved 12.7 nm minimum pattern size of resist feature at 16 nm half pitch printing by interference projection system on Extreme Ultraviolet lithography, whereas Rinse-A showed 16.5 nm.
[1]
Yasin Ekinci,et al.
EUV resists towards 11nm half-pitch
,
2014,
Advanced Lithography.
[2]
Nelson Felix,et al.
Towards production ready processing with a state-of-the-art EUV cluster
,
2015,
Advanced Lithography.
[3]
Hideaki Tsubaki,et al.
Negative-tone Imaging with EUV Exposure
,
2015
.
[4]
Pieter Brandt,et al.
Comparison between e-beam direct write and immersion lithography for 20nm node
,
2015,
Advanced Lithography.
[5]
Georg Soumagne,et al.
Performance of one hundred watt HVM LPP-EUV source
,
2015,
Advanced Lithography.
[6]
Kenji Kurihara,et al.
Dimensional limitations of silicon nanolines resulting from pattern distortion due to surface tension of rinse water
,
1995
.
[7]
Anne-Marie Goethals,et al.
Manufacturability improvements in EUV resist processing toward NXE:3300 processing
,
2014,
Advanced Lithography.
[9]
Dominic Ashworth,et al.
SEMATECH's cycles of learning test for EUV photoresist and its applications for process improvement
,
2014,
Advanced Lithography.
[10]
E. Hendrickx,et al.
Latest cluster performance for EUV lithography
,
2012,
Advanced Lithography.
[11]
Yukiko Kikuchi,et al.
Study of LWR reduction and pattern collapse suppression for 16nm node EUV resists
,
2013,
Advanced Lithography.
[12]
R. Cameron,et al.
Nanoindentation analysis of αtricalcium phosphate-poly(lactide-co-glycolide) nanocomposite degradation.
,
2014,
Materials science & engineering. C, Materials for biological applications.
[13]
Joy Cheng,et al.
Directed Self-assembly of Topcoat-free, Integration-friendly High-χ Block Copolymers
,
2014
.