Advances in data storage and image acquisition technologies have enabled the creation of large image datasets. In this scenario, it is necessary to develop appropriate information systems to efficiently manage these collections. The most common approaches use Content-Based Image Retrieval (CBIR). The goal of CBIR systems is to support image retrieval based on content e.g., shape, color, texture. In this paper color extraction and comparison were performed using the three color histograms, conventional color histogram (CCH), invariant color histogram (ICH) and fuzzy color histogram (FCH) .The conventional color histogram (CCH) of an image indicates the frequency of occurrence of every color in an image. The appealing aspect of the CCH is its simplicity and ease of computation. There are however, several difficulties associated with the CCH. The first of these is the high dimensionality of the CCH, even after drastic quantization of the color space. Another downside of the CCH is that it does not take into consideration color similarity across different bins and cannot handle rotation and translation. To address the problem of rotation and translation an invariant color histograms(ICH) based on the color gradients is used and to address the problem of spatial relationship fuzzy linking color histogram (FCH) is used.
[1]
Kai-Kuang Ma,et al.
Fuzzy color histogram and its use in color image retrieval
,
2002,
IEEE Trans. Image Process..
[2]
Ying Liu,et al.
A survey of content-based image retrieval with high-level semantics
,
2007,
Pattern Recognit..
[3]
Yiannis Aloimonos,et al.
Deformation and Viewpoint Invariant Color Histograms
,
2006,
BMVC.
[4]
Antonios Gasteratos,et al.
Image retrieval based on fuzzy color histogram processing
,
2005
.
[5]
Mika Rautiainen,et al.
Temporal color correlograms for video retrieval
,
2002,
Object recognition supported by user interaction for service robots.
[6]
L.-H. Chen,et al.
Colour image retrieval based on primitives of colour moments
,
2002
.