The Institutional Approach for Modeling the Evolution of Human Societies

Artificial life is concerned with understanding the dynamics of human societies. A defining feature of any society is its institutions. However, defining exactly what an institution is has proven difficult, with authors often talking past each other. This article presents a dynamic model of institutions, which views them as political game forms that generate the rules of a group's economic interactions. Unlike most prior work, the framework presented here allows for the construction of explicit models of the evolution of institutional rules. It takes account of the fact that group members are likely to try to create rules that benefit themselves. Following from this, it allows us to determine the conditions under which self-interested individuals will create institutional rules that support cooperation—for example, that prevent a tragedy of the commons. The article finishes with an example of how a model of the evolution of institutional rewards and punishments for promoting cooperation can be created. It is intended that this framework will allow artificial life researchers to examine how human groups can themselves create conditions for cooperation. This will help provide a better understanding of historical human social evolution, and facilitate the resolution of pressing societal social dilemmas.

[1]  Nicolas Baumard,et al.  Has punishment played a role in the evolution of cooperation? A critical review , 2010 .

[2]  Samuel Bowles,et al.  Coevolution of farming and private property during the early Holocene , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  Chris Reed,et al.  Knowing When To Bargain - The roles of negotiation and persuasion in dialogue , 2006, COMMA.

[4]  T. Price,et al.  Social Inequality at the Origins of Agriculture , 1995 .

[5]  Joseph Henrich,et al.  Tribal Social Instincts and the Cultural Evolution of Institutions to Solve Collective Action Problems , 2009 .

[6]  Robert Boyd,et al.  Rapid cultural adaptation can facilitate the evolution of large-scale cooperation , 2010, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[7]  M. Gurven,et al.  From Forest to Reservation: Transitions in Food-Sharing Behavior among the Ache of Paraguay , 2002, Journal of Anthropological Research.

[8]  David G. Rand,et al.  Anti-social Punishment Can Prevent the Co-evolution of Punishment and Cooperation , 2010 .

[9]  Xiaojie Chen,et al.  First carrot, then stick: how the adaptive hybridization of incentives promotes cooperation , 2015, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[10]  J. Lane Why Nations Fail. The Origins of Power, Prosperity and Poverty , 2014 .

[11]  Michael D. Vose,et al.  Dynamics of Alliance Formation and the Egalitarian Revolution , 2008, PloS one.

[12]  Laurent Lehmann,et al.  When is bigger better? The effects of group size on the evolution of helping behaviours , 2017, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[13]  Ulf Dieckmann,et al.  The take-it-or-leave-it option allows small penalties to overcome social dilemmas , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  E. Ostrom Understanding Institutional Diversity , 2005 .

[15]  P J Richerson,et al.  Group selection among alternative evolutionarily stable strategies. , 1990, Journal of theoretical biology.

[16]  Michael Gurven,et al.  Natural cooperators: Food sharing in humans and other primates , 2013, Evolutionary anthropology.

[17]  S. Wright,et al.  Evolution in Mendelian Populations. , 1931, Genetics.

[18]  Luke Glowacki,et al.  Self-interested agents create, maintain, and modify group-functional culture , 2016, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[19]  A. Greif Institutions and the Path to the Modern Economy: Lessons from Medieval Trade , 2006 .

[20]  Leonid Hurwicz,et al.  Institutions As Families Of Game Forms , 1996 .

[21]  C. Ember Hierarchy in the Forest: The Evolution of Egalitarian Behavior , 2001 .

[22]  Louis C. Midgley,et al.  The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups , 1969 .

[23]  Simon J. Greenhill,et al.  Rise and fall of political complexity in island South-East Asia and the Pacific , 2010, Nature.

[24]  M. Olson,et al.  The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. , 1973 .

[25]  E. Fehr,et al.  Altruistic punishment in humans , 2002, Nature.

[26]  P. Richerson,et al.  Punishment allows the evolution of cooperation (or anything else) in sizable groups , 1992 .

[27]  Ken Binmore,et al.  Why do people cooperate? , 2006 .

[28]  I. Morris Peter Turchin. Ultrasociety: How 10,000 Years of War made Humans the Greatest Cooperators on Earth. , 2017 .

[29]  Redouan Bshary,et al.  Why humans might help strangers , 2015, Front. Behav. Neurosci..

[30]  T. Earle,et al.  How Chiefs Come to Power: The Political Economy in Prehistory , 1997 .

[31]  Paul L. Hooper,et al.  The evolutionary and ecological roots of human social organization , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[32]  H. Gintis,et al.  The evolution of strong reciprocity: cooperation in heterogeneous populations. , 2004, Theoretical population biology.

[33]  Yunshyong Chow,et al.  On multidimensional discrete-time Beverton–Holt competition models , 2012 .

[34]  C. Hauert,et al.  Via Freedom to Coercion: The Emergence of Costly Punishment , 2007, Science.

[35]  Peter Richerson,et al.  Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence , 2014, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[36]  Grant Ramsey,et al.  What is animal culture , 2017 .

[37]  P. Oliver Rewards and Punishments as Selective Incentives for Collective Action: Theoretical Investigations , 1980, American Journal of Sociology.

[38]  Paul Seabright,et al.  The Company of Strangers , 2010 .

[39]  Luke Glowacki,et al.  Self-Interest and the Design of Rules , 2017, Human Nature.

[40]  Jean-Pierre Bocquet-Appel,et al.  When the World’s Population Took Off: The Springboard of the Neolithic Demographic Transition , 2011, Science.

[41]  C. Kusimba,et al.  The Archaeology of Trading Systems, Part 1: Towards a New Trade Synthesis , 2008 .

[42]  M. Feldman,et al.  Cultural transmission and evolution: a quantitative approach. , 1981, Monographs in population biology.

[43]  F. Guala Reciprocity: Weak or strong? What punishment experiments do (and do not) demonstrate , 2010, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[44]  C. List,et al.  Group decisions in humans and animals: a survey , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[45]  Laurent Lehmann,et al.  How institutions shaped the last major evolutionary transition to large-scale human societies , 2016, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[46]  A. Greif,et al.  The fundamental problem of exchange: A research agenda in Historical Institutional Analysis , 2000 .

[47]  G. Brady Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action , 1993 .

[48]  Fekri A. Hassan,et al.  On Mechanisms of Population Growth During the Neolithic , 1973, Current Anthropology.

[49]  E. Ostrom,et al.  Covenants with and without a Sword: Self-Governance Is Possible , 1992, American Political Science Review.

[50]  M. Dufwenberg Game theory. , 2011, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science.

[51]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Shared intentionality. , 2007, Developmental science.

[52]  Laurent Lehmann,et al.  The co-evolution of social institutions, demography, and large-scale human cooperation. , 2013, Ecology letters.

[53]  Stanley Reiter On endogenous economic regulation , 1996 .

[54]  David M. Carballo,et al.  Cooperation and Collective Action in the Cultural Evolution of Complex Societies , 2014 .

[55]  Eörs Szathmáry,et al.  The Major Transitions in Evolution , 1997 .

[56]  R. Boyd,et al.  The evolution of altruistic punishment , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[57]  G. Hardin,et al.  The Tragedy of the Commons , 1968, Green Planet Blues.

[58]  Charles S. Spencer,et al.  Territorial expansion and primary state formation , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[59]  Michael Gurven,et al.  The Natural History of Human Food Sharing and Cooperation: A Review and a New Multi-Individual Approach to the Negotiation of Norms , 2001 .

[60]  James H. Fowler,et al.  Human cooperation: Second-order free-riding problem solved? , 2005, Nature.

[61]  Paul R. Milgrom,et al.  The role of institutions in the revival of trade: the law merchant , 1990 .

[62]  F. Marlowe Hunter‐gatherers and human evolution , 2005 .

[63]  Ruth Mace,et al.  Demography and ecology drive variation in cooperation across human populations , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[64]  Wei Li,et al.  Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance , 2009, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[65]  Laurent Lehmann,et al.  An evolutionary model explaining the Neolithic transition from egalitarianism to leadership and despotism , 2014, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[66]  H. Ofek,et al.  Second Nature: Economic Origins of Human Evolution , 2001 .

[67]  B. Galef The question of animal culture , 1992, Human nature.

[68]  Martin H. Levinson Not by Genes Alone: How Culture Transformed Human Evolution , 2006 .

[69]  F. Marlowe,et al.  Hunting and Gathering , 2007 .

[70]  K. Foster,et al.  Diminishing returns in social evolution: the not‐so‐tragic commons , 2004, Journal of evolutionary biology.