On the relationship between coefficient alpha and composite reliability.

Cronbach's coefficient alpha is the most widely used estimator of the reliability of tests and scales. However, it has been criticized as being a lower bound and hence underestimating true reliability. A popular alternative to coefficient alpha is composite reliability, which is usually calculated in conjunction with structural equation modeling. A quantitative analysis of 2,524 pairs of coefficient alpha and composite reliability values derived from empirical investigations revealed that although the average composite reliability value (.86) exceeded the average corresponding coefficient alpha value (.84), the difference was relatively inconsequential for practical applications such as meta-analysis.

[1]  R. Peterson.  A Meta-analysis of Cronbach's Coefficient Alpha , 1994 .

[2]  N. Schmitt.  Uses and abuses of coefficient alpha. , 1996 .

[3]  R. P. McDonald,et al.  Test Theory: A Unified Treatment , 1999 .

[4]  Peter M. Bentler,et al.  Alpha, Dimension-Free, and Model-Based Internal Consistency Reliability , 2009, Psychometrika.

[5]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[6]  Samuel B. Green,et al.  Reliability of Summed Item Scores Using Structural Equation Modeling: An Alternative to Coefficient Alpha , 2009 .

[7]  David J. Ketchen,et al.  AN ASSESSMENT OF THE USE OF STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT RESEARCH , 2004 .

[8]  J. M. Cortina,et al.  What Is Coefficient Alpha? An Examination of Theory and Applications , 1993 .

[9]  K. Jöreskog.  Statistical analysis of sets of congeneric tests , 1971 .

[10]  T. Raykov.  Estimation of Composite Reliability for Congeneric Measures , 1997 .

[11]  Samuel B. Green,et al.  Commentary on Coefficient Alpha: A Cautionary Tale , 2009 .

[12]  J. Graham.  Congeneric and (Essentially) Tau-Equivalent Estimates of Score Reliability , 2006 .

[13]  Lee J. Cronbach,et al.  Alpha Coefficients for Stratified-Parallel Tests , 1965 .

[14]  S. Ferketich,et al.  Internal consistency estimates of reliability , 1990 .

[15]  Michael C. Rodriguez,et al.  Meta-analysis of coefficient alpha. , 2006, Psychological methods.

[16]  William Revelle,et al.  Cronbach’s α, Revelle’s β, and Mcdonald’s ωH: their relations with each other and two alternative conceptualizations of reliability , 2005 .

[17]  D. Frisbie,et al.  Estimating Reliability Under a Generalizability Theory Model for Test Scores Composed of Testlets , 1999 .

[18]  Steven P. Brown,et al.  On the use of beta coefficients in meta-analysis. , 2005, The Journal of applied psychology.

[19]  W. Revelle,et al.  Coefficients Alpha, Beta, Omega, and the glb: Comments on Sijtsma , 2009 .

[20]  S. Green,et al.  Coefficient Alpha: A Reliability Coefficient for the 21st Century? , 2011 .

[21]  Tenko Raykov,et al.  Bias of Coefficient afor Fixed Congeneric Measures with Correlated Errors , 2001 .

[22]  Klaas Sijtsma,et al.  On the Use, the Misuse, and the Very Limited Usefulness of Cronbach’s Alpha , 2008, Psychometrika.

[23]  David R. Heise,et al.  VALIDITY, INVALIDITY, AND RELIABILITY , 1970 .

[24]  Donald R. Bacon,et al.  Composite Reliability in Structural Equations Modeling , 1995 .

[25]  L. Cronbach.  Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests , 1951 .

[26]  M. R. Novick,et al.  Coefficient alpha and the reliability of composite measurements. , 1967, Psychometrika.