Dissociating Sentential Prosody from Sentence Processing: Activation Interacts with Task Demands

Sentence processing was contrasted with processing of syntactic prosody under two task conditions in order to examine the representation of these components of language and their interaction with working memory load. Twelve adults received fMDI scans while they listened to low-pass filtered and unfiltered sentences either passively, or during tasks that required subjects to remember and recognize information contained in the stimuli. Results indicated that temporal activation for prosodic stimuli differed compared to activation for sentence stimuli only during passive listening tasks. The inclusion of memory demands was associated with frontal activation, which was differentially lateralized for sentence and prosodic stimuli. The results demonstrate differential brain activation for prosodic vs sentential stimuli which interacts with the memory demands placed on the subjects.

[1]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Dissociating working memory from task difficulty in human prefrontal cortex , 1997, Neuropsychologia.

[2]  Stephen M. Rao,et al.  Function of the left planum temporale in auditory and linguistic processing , 1996, NeuroImage.

[3]  R. Zatorre,et al.  When that tune runs through your head: a PET investigation of auditory imagery for familiar melodies. , 1999, Cerebral cortex.

[4]  A Jesmanowicz,et al.  Lateralized human brain language systems demonstrated by task subtraction functional magnetic resonance imaging. , 1995, Archives of neurology.

[5]  A. Woodward,et al.  Perception of acoustic correlates of major phrasal units by young infants , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.

[6]  P. Goldman-Rakic,et al.  Human Brain Mapping 6:14–32(1998) � Dissociation of Mnemonic and Perceptual Processes During Spatial and Nonspatial Working Memory Using fMRI , 2022 .

[7]  D. V. von Cramon,et al.  Neurocognition of auditory sentence comprehension: event related fMRI reveals sensitivity to syntactic violations and task demands. , 2000, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[8]  N. Andreasen,et al.  Anatomic and Functional Variability: The Effects of Filter Size in Group fMRI Data Analysis , 2001, NeuroImage.

[9]  M. Just,et al.  Brain Activation Modulated by Sentence Comprehension , 1996, Science.

[10]  S. Bookheimer,et al.  Form and Content Dissociating Syntax and Semantics in Sentence Comprehension , 1999, Neuron.

[11]  R L Buckner,et al.  Functional neuroimaging studies of encoding, priming, and explicit memory retrieval. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  R S Frackowiak,et al.  A PET study of cognitive strategies in normal subjects during language tasks. Influence of phonetic ambiguity and sequence processing on phoneme monitoring. , 1994, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[13]  Toshio Inui,et al.  A functional magnetic resonance imaging study of listening comprehension of languages in human at 3 tesla-comprehension level and activation of the language areas , 1999, Neuroscience Letters.

[14]  D. Shankweiler,et al.  An Event-related Neuroimaging Study Distinguishing Form and Content in Sentence Processing , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[15]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Neural mechanisms underlying melodic perception and memory for pitch , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[16]  J. Gore,et al.  An Event-Related fMRI Study of Implicit Phrase-Level Syntactic and Semantic Processing , 1999, NeuroImage.

[17]  Y. Miyashita,et al.  A syntactic specialization for Broca's area. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  Karl Magnus Petersson,et al.  Effective Auditory–Verbal Encoding Activates the Left Prefrontal and the Medial Temporal Lobes: A Generalization to Illiterate Subjects , 1999, NeuroImage.

[19]  Hiroshi Fukuda,et al.  Changes of regional cerebral blood flow during listening to an unfamiliar spoken language , 1993, Neuroscience Letters.

[20]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  A Parametric Study of Prefrontal Cortex Involvement in Human Working Memory , 1996, NeuroImage.

[21]  O Muzik,et al.  Receptive and expressive language activations for sentences: a PET study , 1997, Neuroreport.

[22]  Randy L. Buckner,et al.  Set-and Code-Specific Activation in the Frontal Cortex: An fMRI Study of Encoding and Retrieval of Faces and Words , 1999, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[23]  M S Cohen,et al.  Stability, repeatability, and the expression of signal magnitude in functional magnetic resonance imaging , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[24]  K. Zilles,et al.  Recognition of emotional prosody and verbal components of spoken language: an fMRI study. , 2000, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[25]  J. Desmond,et al.  Load-Dependent Roles of Frontal Brain Regions in the Maintenance of Working Memory , 1999, NeuroImage.

[26]  J. Desmond,et al.  Material‐specific lateralization of prefrontal activation during episodic encoding and retrieval , 1998, Neuroreport.

[27]  N. Sadato,et al.  Functional asymmetry of human prefrontal cortex in verbal and non-verbal episodic memory as revealed by fMRI. , 2000, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[28]  A. Friederici,et al.  Functional asymmetry of human prefrontal cortex: encoding and retrieval of verbally and nonverbally coded information. , 2000, Learning & memory.

[29]  N. Alpert,et al.  Localization of Syntactic Comprehension by Positron Emission Tomography , 1996, Brain and Language.