Institutionalising Biodiversity Conservation - The Case of Ethiopian Coffee Forests

The predominant notion on institutionalising biodiversity conservation is that as a result of the features and functions of biodiversity as well as the attributes of the actors, institutional diversity and multi-level governance are required. Institutional diversity per se, however, is not a panacea for successful biodiversity conservation and even less useful for identifying starting points for action. The Ethiopian case demonstrates what happens when—according to theory—the government "steps aside" and the "market works its wonders". After recognising the importance of institutional diversity, the challenge is to shape its context-specific patterns by identifying starting points for action. This requires guidance, mediation, and facilitation. The attempt to conserve Ethiopian coffee forests illustrates that the government, NGOs, local communities as well as private companies have their individual interests but also share a common vision to conserve forests. Well coordinated collective action is identified as a necessary consequence of institutional diversity.

[1]  G. Borrini-Feyerabend,et al.  Co-management of natural resources: organizing, negotiating and learning-by-doing , 2000 .

[2]  Elizabeth R. DeSombre,et al.  The Institutional Dimensions of Environmental Change: Fit, Interplay, and Scale , 2002 .

[3]  O. Williamson The New Institutional Economics: Taking Stock, Looking Ahead , 2000 .

[4]  F. Gatzweiler,et al.  The evolution of institutions in transition , 2002 .

[5]  Charis Gresser,et al.  Mugged: Poverty in Your Coffee Cup , 2004 .

[6]  F. Scharpf Games Real Actors Play: Actor-centered Institutionalism In Policy Research , 1997 .

[7]  J. Jütting INSTITUTIONS AND DEVELOPMENT: A CRITICAL REVIEW , 2003 .

[8]  E. Ostrom,et al.  The Struggle to Govern the Commons , 2003, Science.

[9]  R. D. Groot,et al.  A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services , 2002 .

[10]  R. S. de Groot,et al.  Ecological functions and socio-economic values of critical natural capital as a measure for ecological integrity and environmental health , 1999 .

[11]  E. Ostrom,et al.  Rules, Games, and Common-Pool Resources , 1994 .

[12]  E. Ostrom The Comparative Study of Public Economies , 1998 .

[13]  Introduction to Property Rights and Biodiversity Conservation: Convergence or Conflict? , 2003, Land Economics.

[14]  V. Ramanatha Rao,et al.  Managing Plant Genetic Diversity , 2002 .

[15]  E. Ostrom,et al.  Trust and reciprocity : interdisciplinary lessons from experimental research , 2003 .

[16]  J. Turpie,et al.  ECONOMIC ASPECTS OF COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT IN SUSTAINABLE FOREST MANAGEMENT IN EASTERN AND SOUTHERN AFRICA , 2001 .

[17]  F. Gatzweiler,et al.  Sustainable Agriculture in Central and Eastern European Countries: The Environmental Effects of Transition and Needs for Change , 2002 .

[18]  K. Gaston,et al.  Why private institutions alone will not do enough to protect biodiversity , 2000, Nature.

[19]  J. Mayne,et al.  Food and Agriculture Organisation , 1948, Nature.

[20]  J. Mburu,et al.  Wildlife Conservation and Management in Kenya: Towards a Co-Management Approach , 2004 .

[21]  Elinor Ostrom,et al.  Trust And Reciprocity , 2003 .

[22]  K. Hagedorn,et al.  Institutional arrangements for environmental co-operatives: a conceptual framework. , 2002 .

[23]  Douglass C. North,et al.  Where Have We Been and Where are We Going? , 1996 .

[24]  R. O'Neill,et al.  The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital , 1997, Nature.

[25]  William N. Dunn,et al.  Public Policy Analysis , 1981 .

[26]  M. Leach,et al.  Practising “biodiversity” in Guinea: nature, nation and an international convention , 2003 .

[27]  Kenneth N. Bickers,et al.  Public Policy Analysis: A Political Economy Approach , 2000 .

[28]  A. Agrawal The community vs. the market and the state: Forest use inUttarakhand in the Indian Himalayas , 1996 .

[29]  L. Hooghe,et al.  Unraveling the Central State, but How? Types of Multi-level Governance , 2003, American Political Science Review.