Effluent quality prediction in papermaking wastewater treatment processes using dynamic Bayesian networks

Abstract Effective online modeling of papermaking wastewater treatment processes (WWTPs) is an important means to ensure wastewater recycling and harmless discharge. A composite model integrating variable importance in projection with dynamic Bayesian networks (VIP-DBN) is proposed to improve the modeling ability and reliability in WWTPs. First, a variable selection method is applied to simplify the network structure and reduce modeling costs. Then the augmented matrices technique is embedded into the Bayesian networks to cope with the dynamic characteristics, nonlinearity, and uncertainty simultaneously. The modeling performance of VIP-DBN is evaluated through two case studies, a simulated WWTP based on benchmark simulation model no. 1 (BSM1) and a real papermaking WWTPs, in which the VIP-DBN model shows better modeling performance than its rivals. Specifically, compared with partial least squares, artificial neural networks, and Bayesian networks, the determination coefficient value of VIP-DBN is increased by 34.36%, 20.55%, and 3.30%, respectively, for the prediction of effluent nitrate in BSM1. The VIP-DBN can be used to deal with complex WWTPs in industrial applications, which provides a better practical method for soft sensor modeling and a guarantee for the effective decision-making of wastewater treatment processes for papermaking enterprises.

[1]  C. Jun,et al.  Performance of some variable selection methods when multicollinearity is present , 2005 .

[2]  Johan Trygg,et al.  Variable influence on projection (VIP) for orthogonal projections to latent structures (OPLS) , 2014 .

[3]  Tao Liu,et al.  A comprehensive review on toxic petrochemical wastewater pretreatment and advanced treatment , 2020 .

[4]  Xiao Fan Wang,et al.  Soft sensing modeling based on support vector machine and Bayesian model selection , 2004, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[5]  Shifei Ding,et al.  An optimizing BP neural network algorithm based on genetic algorithm , 2011, Artificial Intelligence Review.

[6]  Sen Huang,et al.  A Bayesian Network model for predicting cooling load of commercial buildings , 2018 .

[7]  ChangKyoo Yoo,et al.  Statistical monitoring of dynamic processes based on dynamic independent component analysis , 2004 .

[8]  ChangKyoo Yoo,et al.  Soft sensor modeling of industrial process data using kernel latent variables-based relevance vector machine , 2020, Appl. Soft Comput..

[9]  Bengt Carlsson,et al.  Dynamic Nonlinear Partial Least Squares Modeling Using Gaussian Process Regression , 2019, Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research.

[10]  F. Tsai,et al.  Prediction of effluent quality parameters of a wastewater treatment plant using a supervised committee fuzzy logic model , 2018 .

[11]  Marios K. Chryssanthopoulos,et al.  Bridge condition modelling and prediction using dynamic Bayesian belief networks , 2015 .

[12]  S. Tsakovski,et al.  Comparison of the variable importance in projection (VIP) and of the selectivity ratio (SR) methods for variable selection and interpretation , 2015 .

[13]  Christos Georgakis,et al.  Disturbance detection and isolation by dynamic principal component analysis , 1995 .

[14]  Biao Huang,et al.  Design of inferential sensors in the process industry: A review of Bayesian methods , 2013 .

[15]  Hao Zhang,et al.  Modeling of Wastewater Treatment Processes Using Dynamic Bayesian Networks Based on Fuzzy PLS , 2020, IEEE Access.

[16]  Daoping Huang,et al.  A novel fault identification and root-causality analysis of incipient faults with applications to wastewater treatment processes , 2019, Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems.

[17]  Haizhen Yang,et al.  Prediction analysis of a wastewater treatment system using a Bayesian network , 2013, Environ. Model. Softw..

[18]  Soon Keat Tan,et al.  Localized, Adaptive Recursive Partial Least Squares Regression for Dynamic System Modeling , 2012 .

[19]  Hiromasa Kaneko,et al.  Development of Soft Sensor Models Based on Time Difference of Process Variables with Accounting for Nonlinear Relationship , 2011 .

[20]  S. Joe Qin Statistical process monitoring: basics and beyond , 2022 .

[21]  Richard M. Stuetz,et al.  On‐line monitoring of wastewater quality: a review , 2001 .

[22]  Munir Ahmed,et al.  Sequential treatment of paper and pulp industrial wastewater: Prediction of water quality parameters by Mamdani Fuzzy Logic model and phytotoxicity assessment. , 2019, Chemosphere.

[23]  Yan Wang,et al.  Prediction of effluent quality of a paper mill wastewater treatment using an adaptive network-based fuzzy inference system , 2011, Appl. Soft Comput..

[24]  P. E. Poh,et al.  Resolving stability issue of thermophilic high-rate anaerobic palm oil mill effluent treatment via adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system predictive model , 2018, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[25]  G. Zupančič,et al.  The re-use of Waste-Activated Sludge as part of a "zero-sludge" strategy for wastewater treatments in the pulp and paper industry. , 2014, Bioresource technology.

[26]  Göksel N. Demirer,et al.  Cleaner production opportunity assessment study in SEKA Balikesir pulp and paper mill , 2008 .

[27]  Tiago J. Rato,et al.  Building Optimal Multiresolution Soft Sensors for Continuous Processes , 2018 .

[28]  Paolo Gastaldo,et al.  Bayesian network based extreme learning machine for subjectivity detection , 2017, J. Frankl. Inst..

[29]  S. Wold,et al.  PLS-regression: a basic tool of chemometrics , 2001 .

[30]  Min Xie,et al.  A Real-Time Fault Diagnosis Methodology of Complex Systems Using Object-Oriented Bayesian Networks , 2016, Bayesian Networks in Fault Diagnosis.

[31]  Montserrat Pérez-Moya,et al.  Data-driven soft-sensors for online monitoring of batch processes with different initial conditions , 2018, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[32]  Minseok Choi,et al.  Dimension reduction in heterogeneous neural networks: Generalized Polynomial Chaos (gPC) and ANalysis-Of-VAriance (ANOVA) , 2016, 1603.06643.

[33]  M. Lucas,et al.  Application of Advanced Oxidation Processes for the Treatment of Recalcitrant Agro-Industrial Wastewater: A Review , 2019, Water.

[34]  Zhiqiang Ge,et al.  Adaptive soft sensors for quality prediction under the framework of Bayesian network , 2018 .

[35]  Emmanuel B. Boateng,et al.  Modelling carbon emission intensity: Application of artificial neural network , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[36]  A. Bulpitt,et al.  Insights into protein-protein interfaces using a Bayesian network prediction method. , 2006, Journal of molecular biology.

[37]  Anthony T. C. Goh,et al.  An improvement to MLR model for predicting liquefaction-induced lateral spread using multivariate adaptive regression splines , 2014 .

[38]  Zonghai Sun,et al.  Statistical Monitoring of Wastewater Treatment Plants Using Variational Bayesian PCA , 2014 .

[39]  Abu Hasan Hassimi,et al.  Performance of continuous pilot subsurface constructed wetland using Scirpus grossus for removal of COD, colour and suspended solid in recycled pulp and paper effluent , 2019, Environmental Technology & Innovation.

[40]  Jian Sun,et al.  A dynamic Bayesian network model for real-time crash prediction using traffic speed conditions data , 2015 .