The Influence of Strategic Patenting on Companies' Patent Portfolios

This paper analyses whether strategic motives for patenting influence the characteristics of companies' patent portfolios. We use the number of citations and oppositions to represent these characteristics. The investigation is based on survey and patent data from German companies. We find clear evidence that the companies' patenting strategies explain the characteristics of their patent portfolios. First, companies using patents to protect their technological knowledge base receive a higher number of citations for their patents. Second, the motive of offensive - but not of defensive - blocking is related to a higher incidence of oppositions, whereas companies using patents as bartering chips in collaborations receive fewer oppositions to their patents.

[1]  Carine Peeters,et al.  Innovation strategy and the patenting behavior of firms , 2006 .

[2]  A. Arundel.  The relative effectiveness of patents and secrecy for appropriation , 2001 .

[3]  Rosemarie H. Ziedonis,et al.  The patent paradox revisited: an empirical study of patenting in the U , 2001 .

[4]  Rosemarie H. Ziedonis,et al.  Reprinted Article The patent paradox revisited: an empirical study of patenting in the U.S. semiconductor industry, 1979–1995 , 2009 .

[5]  K. Blind,et al.  Motives to patent: Empirical evidence from Germany , 2006 .

[6]  David C. Mowery,et al.  Post-Issue Patent "Quality Control": A Comparative Study of Us Patent Re-Examinations and European Patent Oppositions , 2002 .

[7]  Ashish Arora,et al.  The Value of International Patent Rights , 2001 .

[8]  Carl Shapiro,et al.  Antitrust Limits to Patent Settlements , 2001 .

[9]  Mark Schankerman,et al.  Enforcement of patent rights in the United States , 2003 .

[10]  D. Harhoff,et al.  Determinants of Opposition against EPO Patent Grants – The Case of Biotechnology and Pharmaceuticals ∗ , 2002 .

[11]  Mark A. Schankerman,et al.  Patent Quality and Research Productivity: Measuring Innovation with Multiple Indicators , 2004 .

[12]  Karin Hoisl,et al.  European Patent Citations – How to Count and How to Interpret them, unpublished manuscript, University of Munich , 2009 .

[13]  Brijesh Pazhayathodi,et al.  Review of The Economics of Information Technology: An Introduction , 2008 .

[14]  Deepak Somaya.  Strategic determinants of decisions not to settle patent litigation , 2003 .

[15]  Z. Griliches,et al.  Citations, Family Size, Opposition and the Value of Patent Rights Have Profited from Comments and Suggestions , 2002 .

[16]  Wesley M. Cohen,et al.  R&D spillovers, patents and the incentives to innovate in Japan and the United States , 2002 .

[17]  K. Hussinger.  IS SILENCE GOLDEN? PATENTS VERSUS SECRECY AT THE FIRM LEVEL , 2006 .

[18]  Scott Shane,et al.  The Halo Effect and Technology Licensing: The Influence of Institutional Prestige on the Licensing of University Inventions , 2003, Manag. Sci..