Rapid MCNP simulation of DNA double strand break (DSB) relative biological effectiveness (RBE) for photons, neutrons, and light ions

To account for particle interactions in the extracellular (physical) environment, information from the cell-level Monte Carlo damage simulation (MCDS) for DNA double strand break (DSB) induction has been integrated into the general purpose Monte Carlo N-particle (MCNP) radiation transport code system. The effort to integrate these models is motivated by the need for a computationally efficient model to accurately predict particle relative biological effectiveness (RBE) in cell cultures and in vivo. To illustrate the approach and highlight the impact of the larger scale physical environment (e.g. establishing charged particle equilibrium), we examined the RBE for DSB induction (RBEDSB) of x-rays, (137)Cs γ-rays, neutrons and light ions relative to γ-rays from (60)Co in monolayer cell cultures at various depths in water. Under normoxic conditions, we found that (137)Cs γ-rays are about 1.7% more effective at creating DSB than γ-rays from (60)Co (RBEDSB  =  1.017) whereas 60-250 kV x-rays are 1.1 to 1.25 times more efficient at creating DSB than (60)Co. Under anoxic conditions, kV x-rays may have an RBEDSB up to 1.51 times as large as (60)Co γ-rays. Fission neutrons passing through monolayer cell cultures have an RBEDSB that ranges from 2.6 to 3.0 in normoxic cells, but may be as large as 9.93 for anoxic cells. For proton pencil beams, Monte Carlo simulations suggest an RBEDSB of about 1.2 at the tip of the Bragg peak and up to 1.6 a few mm beyond the Bragg peak. Bragg peak RBEDSB increases with decreasing oxygen concentration, which may create opportunities to apply proton dose painting to help address tumor hypoxia. Modeling of the particle RBE for DSB induction across multiple physical and biological scales has the potential to aid in the interpretation of laboratory experiments and provide useful information to advance the safety and effectiveness of hadron therapy in the treatment of cancer.

[1]  David J Carlson,et al.  A mechanism-based approach to predict the relative biological effectiveness of protons and carbon ions in radiation therapy. , 2012, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[2]  V. Semenenko,et al.  Monte Carlo Simulation of Base and Nucleotide Excision Repair of Clustered DNA Damage Sites. I. Model Properties and Predicted Trends , 2005, Radiation research.

[3]  Michael Scholz,et al.  Calculation of the biological effects of ion beams based on the microscopic spatial damage distribution pattern , 2012, International journal of radiation biology.

[4]  R. Stewart,et al.  Monte Carlo simulation of DNA damage induction by x-rays and selected radioisotopes , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[5]  P O'Neill,et al.  Computational Approach for Determining the Spectrum of DNA Damage Induced by Ionizing Radiation , 2001, Radiation research.

[6]  H. Nikjoo,et al.  Spectrum of Radiation-Induced Clustered Non-DSB Damage – A Monte Carlo Track Structure Modeling and Calculations , 2015, Radiation research.

[7]  Harald Paganetti,et al.  Relative biological effectiveness (RBE) values for proton beam therapy. Variations as a function of biological endpoint, dose, and linear energy transfer , 2014, Physics in medicine and biology.

[8]  S. Tu,et al.  Fast Monte Carlo simulation of DNA damage induction by Auger-electron emission , 2014, International journal of radiation biology.

[9]  W. Morgan,et al.  Non-targeted and Delayed Effects of Exposure to Ionizing Radiation: II. Radiation-Induced Genomic Instability and Bystander Effects In Vivo, Clastogenic Factors and Transgenerational Effects , 2003, Radiation research.

[10]  D T Goodhead,et al.  Initial events in the cellular effects of ionizing radiations: clustered damage in DNA. , 1994, International journal of radiation biology.

[11]  R. Hromas,et al.  Mechanisms of oncogenic chromosomal translocations , 2014, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[12]  C E deAlmeida,et al.  The invariance of the total direct DNA strand break yield. , 2011, Medical physics.

[13]  Michael Scholz,et al.  Modeling Cell Survival after Photon Irradiation Based on Double-Strand Break Clustering in Megabase Pair Chromatin Loops , 2012, Radiation research.

[14]  M. Phillips,et al.  Validation of the Pinnacle3 photon convolution‐superposition algorithm applied to fast neutron beams , 2013, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[15]  V A Semenenko,et al.  A Fast Monte Carlo Algorithm to Simulate the Spectrum of DNA Damages Formed by Ionizing Radiation , 2004, Radiation research.

[16]  R. Hawkins.  The Relationship Between the Sensitivity of Cells to High-Energy Photons and the RBE of Particle Radiation used in Radiotherapy , 2009, Radiation research.

[17]  A. Chatterjee,et al.  Clusters of DNA induced by ionizing radiation: formation of short DNA fragments. I. Theoretical modeling. , 1996, Radiation research.

[18]  Fereshteh Koosha,et al.  DNA Damage Induced in Glioblastoma Cells by I-131: A Comparison between Experimental Data and Monte Carlo Simulation , 2012, Cell journal.

[19]  P O'Neill,et al.  Computational modelling of low-energy electron-induced DNA damage by early physical and chemical events. , 1997, International journal of radiation biology.

[20]  R. A. Forster,et al.  Initial MCNP6 Release Overview - MCNP6 version 1.0 , 2013 .

[21]  I. Buraczewska,et al.  Biological effectiveness of 12C and 20Ne ions with very high LET , 2008, International journal of radiation biology.

[22]  A. Campa,et al.  DNA DSB induced in human cells by charged particles and gamma rays: Experimental results and theoretical approaches , 2005, International journal of radiation biology.

[23]  F Ballarini,et al.  Stochastic aspects and uncertainties in the prechemical and chemical stages of electron tracks in liquid water: a quantitative analysis based on Monte Carlo simulations , 2000, Radiation and environmental biophysics.

[24]  I. Pshenichnov,et al.  Comparative study of dose distributions and cell survival fractions for 1H, 4He, 12C and 16O beams using Geant4 and Microdosimetric Kinetic model , 2014, Physics in medicine and biology.

[25]  F. Verhaegen,et al.  Calculation of relative biological effectiveness of a low-energy electronic brachytherapy source , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[26]  R. Hawkins.  A microdosimetric-kinetic theory of the dependence of the RBE for cell death on LET. , 1998, Medical physics.

[27]  Issam El Naqa,et al.  On the consistency of Monte Carlo track structure DNA damage simulations. , 2014, Medical physics.

[28]  F. Van den Heuvel.  A Closed Parameterization of DNA–Damage by Charged Particles, as a Function of Energy — A Geometrical Approach , 2014, PloS one.

[29]  R. S. Caswell.  Deposition of Energy by Neutrons in Spherical Cavities , 1966 .

[30]  D. Goodhead,et al.  Modelling of radiation-induced DNA damage: the early physical and chemical event. , 1994, International journal of radiation biology.

[31]  D. Goodhead,et al.  Modelling of DNA damage induced by energetic electrons (100 eV to 100 keV). , 2002, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[32]  E. Wright.  Manifestations and mechanisms of non-targeted effects of ionizing radiation. , 2010, Mutation research.

[33]  J. Funes,et al.  Sequential Transformation of Mesenchymal Stem Cells is Associated with Increased Radiosensitivity and Reduced DNA Repair Capacity , 2013, Radiation research.

[34]  C. Mothersill,et al.  Mechanisms and implications of genomic instability and other delayed effects of ionizing radiation exposure. , 1998, Mutagenesis.

[35]  R. Stewart,et al.  Induction and Repair of Clustered DNA Lesions: What Do We Know So Far? , 2013, Radiation research.

[36]  David J. Carlson,et al.  Combined Use of Monte Carlo DNA Damage Simulations and Deterministic Repair Models to Examine Putative Mechanisms of Cell Killing , 2008, Radiation research.

[37]  H. Paretzke,et al.  Simulation of DNA damage after proton and low LET irradiation. , 2002, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[38]  W. Morgan.  Non-targeted and Delayed Effects of Exposure to Ionizing Radiation: I. Radiation-Induced Genomic Instability and Bystander Effects In Vitro , 2003, Radiation research.

[39]  M. Durante,et al.  DNA end resection is needed for the repair of complex lesions in G1-phase human cells , 2014, Cell cycle.

[40]  K. Stelzer,et al.  Fast neutron radiotherapy. The University of Washington experience. , 1994, Acta oncologica.

[41]  C A Tobias,et al.  The repair-misrepair model in radiobiology: comparison to other models. , 1985, Radiation research. Supplement.

[42]  H. Paretzke,et al.  Interaction of ion tracks in spatial and temporal proximity , 2009, Radiation and environmental biophysics.

[43]  Peter Jacob,et al.  Simulation of DNA Damage after Proton Irradiation , 2003, Radiation research.

[44]  E. Pastwa,et al.  Repair of Radiation-Induced DNA Double-Strand Breaks is Dependent upon Radiation Quality and the Structural Complexity of Double-Strand Breaks , 2003, Radiation research.

[45]  P. Jeggo,et al.  The complexity of DNA double strand breaks is a critical factor enhancing end-resection. , 2013, DNA repair.

[46]  M. Durante,et al.  A DNA Double-Strand Break Kinetic Rejoining Model Based on the Local Effect Model , 2013, Radiation research.

[47]  J. Bedford.  Sublethal damage, potentially lethal damage, and chromosomal aberrations in mammalian cells exposed to ionizing radiations. , 1991, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[48]  Aloke Chatterjee,et al.  Clusters of DNA Damage Induced by Ionizing Radiation: Formation of Short DNA Fragments. I. Theoretical Modeling , 1996 .

[49]  R Roots,et al.  Estimation of life times and diffusion distances of radicals involved in x-ray-induced DNA strand breaks of killing of mammalian cells. , 1975, Radiation research.

[50]  R. Hawkins.  A Microdosimetric-Kinetic Model for the Effect of Non-Poisson Distribution of Lethal Lesions on the Variation of RBE with LET , 2003, Radiation research.

[51]  P. Jeggo.  The fidelity of repair of radiation damage. , 2002, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[52]  M. Löbrich,et al.  Misrepair of radiation-induced DNA double-strand breaks and its relevance for tumorigenesis and cancer treatment (review). , 2002, International journal of oncology.

[53]  Matthew T. Studenski,et al.  The effect of energy spectrum change on DNA damage in and out of field in 10-MV clinical photon beams , 2014, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[54]  S B Curtis,et al.  Lethal and potentially lethal lesions induced by radiation--a unified repair model. , 1986, Radiation research.

[55]  C. Tung,et al.  Monte Carlo simulations of therapeutic proton beams for relative biological effectiveness of double-strand break , 2012, International journal of radiation biology.

[56]  Mariel Vazquez,et al.  Radiation-induced chromosome aberrations: insights gained from biophysical modeling. , 2002, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[57]  A. Campa,et al.  Integration of Monte Carlo Simulations with PFGE Experimental Data Yields Constant RBE of 2.3 for DNA Double-Strand Break Induction by Nitrogen Ions between 125 and 225 keV/μm LET , 2013, Radiation research.

[58]  A. Campa,et al.  A Monte Carlo Study of the Radiation Quality Dependence of DNA Fragmentation Spectra , 2010, Radiation research.

[59]  A. Campa,et al.  DNA Fragmentation Induced in Human Fibroblasts by 56Fe Ions: Experimental Data and Monte Carlo Simulations , 2009, Radiation research.

[60]  P. Mehnati,et al.  Exploration of "over kill effect" of high-LET Ar- and Fe-ions by evaluating the fraction of non-hit cell and interphase death. , 2005, Journal of radiation research.

[61]  V. Semenenko,et al.  Fast Monte Carlo simulation of DNA damage formed by electrons and light ions , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[62]  M Scholz,et al.  The FLUKA Monte Carlo code coupled with the local effect model for biological calculations in carbon ion therapy , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.

[63]  R. Stewart,et al.  RBE of kV CBCT radiation determined by Monte Carlo DNA damage simulations , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.

[64]  F. Kamp,et al.  Fast Biological Modeling for Voxel-based Heavy Ion Treatment Planning Using the Mechanistic Repair-Misrepair-Fixation Model and Nuclear Fragment Spectra. , 2015, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[65]  M. Durante,et al.  Application of the local effect model to predict DNA double-strand break rejoining after photon and high-LET irradiation. , 2015, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[66]  E. Wright,et al.  Untargeted effects of ionizing radiation: implications for radiation pathology. , 2006, Mutation research.

[67]  R K Sachs,et al.  Review: proximity effects in the production of chromosome aberrations by ionizing radiation. , 1997, International journal of radiation biology.

[68]  D. T. Goodhead,et al.  Quantitative modelling of DNA damage using Monte Carlo track structure method , 1999, Radiation and environmental biophysics.

[69]  V. Semenenko,et al.  Monte Carlo Simulation of Base and Nucleotide Excision Repair of Clustered DNA Damage Sites. II. Comparisons of Model Predictions to Measured Data , 2005, Radiation research.

[70]  R. Stewart,et al.  Effects of Radiation Quality and Oxygen on Clustered DNA Lesions and Cell Death , 2011, Radiation research.

[71]  H. Paretzke,et al.  Calculated DNA double-strand break and fragmentation yields after irradiation with He ions , 2005 .

[72]  T. Kanai,et al.  Inactivation of Aerobic and Hypoxic Cells from Three Different Cell Lines by Accelerated 3He-, 12C- and 20Ne-Ion Beams , 2000, Radiation research.

[73]  Harald Paganetti,et al.  Extension of TOPAS for the simulation of proton radiation effects considering molecular and cellular endpoints , 2015, Physics in medicine and biology.

[74]  M N Cornforth,et al.  A quantitative comparison of potentially lethal damage repair and the rejoining of interphase chromosome breaks in low passage normal human fibroblasts. , 1987, Radiation research.

[75]  Robert Jeraj,et al.  Intensity-modulated x-ray (IMXT) versus proton (IMPT) therapy for theragnostic hypoxia-based dose painting. , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[76]  R K Sachs,et al.  The link between low-LET dose-response relations and the underlying kinetics of damage production/repair/misrepair. , 1997, International journal of radiation biology.

[77]  M. Anderson,et al.  Neutron spectrum of a plutonium-beryllium source , 1963 .

[78]  P. Pfeiffer,et al.  Chromosomal aberrations: formation, identification and distribution. , 2002, Mutation research.

[79]  Anne Marsden,et al.  International Organization for Standardization , 2014 .

[80]  J. Kruse,et al.  Optimizing normal tissue sparing in ion therapy using calculated isoeffective dose for ion selection. , 2012, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[81]  Anja Gebauer,et al.  Single-Strand Annealing, Conservative Homologous Recombination, Nonhomologous DNA End Joining, and the Cell Cycle-Dependent Repair of DNA Double-Strand Breaks Induced by Sparsely or Densely Ionizing Radiation , 2009, Radiation research.