Comparative Effectiveness of Digital Versus Film-Screen Mammography in Community Practice in the United States

BACKGROUND Few studies have examined the comparative effectiveness of digital versus film-screen mammography in U.S. community practice. OBJECTIVE To determine whether the interpretive performance of digital and film-screen mammography differs. DESIGN Prospective cohort study. SETTING Mammography facilities in the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium. PARTICIPANTS 329,261 women aged 40 to 79 years underwent 869 286 mammograms (231 034 digital; 638 252 film-screen). MEASUREMENTS Invasive cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosed within 12 months of a digital or film-screen examination and calculation of mammography sensitivity, specificity, cancer detection rates, and tumor outcomes. RESULTS Overall, cancer detection rates and tumor characteristics were similar for digital and film-screen mammography, but the sensitivity and specificity of each modality varied by age, tumor characteristics, breast density, and menopausal status. Compared with film-screen mammography, the sensitivity of digital mammography was significantly higher for women aged 60 to 69 years (89.9% vs. 83.0%; P = 0.014) and those with estrogen receptor-negative cancer (78.5% vs. 65.8%; P = 0.016); borderline significantly higher for women aged 40 to 49 years (82.4% vs. 75.6%; P = 0.071), those with extremely dense breasts (83.6% vs. 68.1%; P = 0.051), and pre- or perimenopausal women (87.1% vs. 81.7%; P = 0.057); and borderline significantly lower for women aged 50 to 59 years (80.5% vs. 85.1%; P = 0.097). The specificity of digital and film-screen mammography was similar by decade of age, except for women aged 40 to 49 years (88.0% vs. 89.7%; P < 0.001). LIMITATION Statistical power for subgroup analyses was limited. CONCLUSION Overall, cancer detection with digital or film-screen mammography is similar in U.S. women aged 50 to 79 years undergoing screening mammography. Women aged 40 to 49 years are more likely to have extremely dense breasts and estrogen receptor-negative tumors; if they are offered mammography screening, they may choose to undergo digital mammography to optimize cancer detection. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE National Cancer Institute.

[1]  P. Skaane,et al.  Randomized trial of screen-film versus full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading in population-based screening program: follow-up and final results of Oslo II study. , 2007, Radiology.

[2]  D. Miglioretti,et al.  Physician predictors of mammographic accuracy. , 2005, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[3]  W. Barlow,et al.  Time trends in radiologists' interpretive performance at screening mammography from the community-based Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium, 1996-2004. , 2010, Radiology.

[4]  D. Miglioretti,et al.  Longitudinal measurement of clinical mammographic breast density to improve estimation of breast cancer risk. , 2007, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[5]  J. Kalbfleisch,et al.  Between- and within-cluster covariate effects in the analysis of clustered data. , 1998, Biometrics.

[6]  P. Skaane.  Studies comparing screen-film mammography and full-field digital mammography in breast cancer screening: Updated review , 2009, Acta radiologica.

[7]  K. Kerlikowske,et al.  Changes in invasive breast cancer and ductal carcinoma in situ rates in relation to the decline in hormone therapy use. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[8]  K. Kerlikowske,et al.  Variability and accuracy in mammographic interpretation using the American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. , 1998, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[9]  D. Miglioretti,et al.  Prognostic characteristics of breast cancer among postmenopausal hormone users in a screened population. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[10]  S. Ciatto,et al.  Categorizing breast mammographic density: intra- and interobserver reproducibility of BI-RADS density categories. , 2005, Breast.

[11]  R. Birdwell,et al.  Diagnostic Performance of Digital Versus Film Mammography for Breast-Cancer Screening , 2006 .

[12]  K. Kerlikowske,et al.  Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium: a national mammography screening and outcomes database. , 1997, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[13]  Jean B. Cormack,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of digital versus film mammography: exploratory analysis of selected population subgroups in DMIST. , 2008, Radiology.

[14]  Max H. Myers,et al.  Manual for Staging of Cancer , 1992 .

[15]  K. Kerlikowske,et al.  Detection of ductal carcinoma in situ in women undergoing screening mammography. , 2002, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[16]  Mark A Helvie,et al.  Invasive cancers detected after breast cancer screening yielded a negative result: relationship of mammographic density to tumor prognostic factors. , 2004, Radiology.

[17]  D. Miglioretti,et al.  Individual and Combined Effects of Age, Breast Density, and Hormone Replacement Therapy Use on the Accuracy of Screening Mammography , 2003, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[18]  Emily White,et al.  Factors contributing to mammography failure in women aged 40-49 years. , 2004, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[19]  Karla Kerlikowske,et al.  Influence of annual interpretive volume on screening mammography performance in the United States. , 2011, Radiology.

[20]  Karla Kerlikowske,et al.  The mammogram that cried Wolfe. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[21]  P. W. Lane,et al.  Analysis of covariance and standardization as instances of prediction. , 1982, Biometrics.

[22]  Gary R Cutter,et al.  Association between mammography timing and measures of screening performance in the United States. , 2005, Radiology.

[23]  Nico Karssemeijer,et al.  Breast cancer screening results 5 years after introduction of digital mammography in a population-based screening program. , 2009, Radiology.

[24]  Mercè Comas,et al.  Implementation of digital mammography in a population-based breast cancer screening program: effect of screening round on recall rate and cancer detection. , 2009, Radiology.

[25]  C. D'Orsi,et al.  Clinical comparison of full-field digital mammography and screen-film mammography for detection of breast cancer. , 2002, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[26]  Sarah Vinnicombe,et al.  Full-field digital versus screen-film mammography: comparison within the UK breast screening program and systematic review of published data. , 2009, Radiology.

[27]  E L Korn,et al.  Predictive Margins with Survey Data , 1999, Biometrics.

[28]  Yulei Jiang,et al.  BI-RADS data should not be used to estimate ROC curves. , 2010, Radiology.