An improvement of multiplicative consistency of reciprocal preference relations: A framework of granular computing

The commonly used preference elicitation method in decision making is the one using pairwise comparison between alternatives. In this kind of decision making scenario, an essential issue requiring attention is that of consistency, particularly in decision problems with numerous alternatives. Consistency is usually linked to the transitivity concept, which is modeled in several diverse ways. Given the importance of avoiding conflicting opinions in decision making, in this study, we propose an approach to improve the consistency when reciprocal preference relations are used. On one hand, consistency is modeled in terms of the multiplicative transitivity property. On the other hand, information granularity is used to introduce and develop the concept of interval reciprocal preference relations in which the entries are constructed as intervals in place of single numeric values. This provides the necessary flexibility to improve the consistency. To illustrate and test the performance of the approach that is proposed here, an example is given.

[1]  Witold Pedrycz,et al.  From logic descriptors to granular logic descriptors: a study in allocation of information granularity , 2012, Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing.

[2]  Witold Pedrycz,et al.  Information granulation as a basis of fuzzy modeling , 2007, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst..

[3]  Witold Pedrycz,et al.  Building consensus in group decision making with an allocation of information granularity , 2014, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[4]  Witold Pedrycz,et al.  The granular extension of Sugeno-type fuzzy models based on optimal allocation of information granularity and its application to forecasting of time series , 2016, Appl. Soft Comput..

[5]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  Multiperson decision-making based on multiplicative preference relations , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[6]  Hassan Rashidi,et al.  An enhanced genetic algorithm with new operators for task scheduling in heterogeneous computing systems , 2017, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell..

[7]  Yu Xue,et al.  Partitioned-cooperative quantum-behaved particle swarm optimization based on multilevel thresholding applied to medical image segmentation , 2017, Appl. Soft Comput..

[8]  Janusz Kacprzyk,et al.  A consensus‐reaching process under intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations , 2003, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[9]  Tripta Thakur,et al.  Comparative analysis of particle swarm optimization variants on distributed generation allocation for network loss minimization , 2014, 2014 First International Conference on Networks & Soft Computing (ICNSC2014).

[10]  Tetsuzo Tanino,et al.  Fuzzy Preference Relations in Group Decision Making , 1988 .

[11]  James Kennedy,et al.  Particle swarm optimization , 2002, Proceedings of ICNN'95 - International Conference on Neural Networks.

[12]  Zhibin Wu,et al.  A consistency and consensus based decision support model for group decision making with multiplicative preference relations , 2012, Decis. Support Syst..

[13]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Intuitionistic preference relations and their application in group decision making , 2007, Inf. Sci..

[14]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Group decision making based on multiple types of linguistic preference relations , 2008, Inf. Sci..

[15]  Ching-Lai Hwang,et al.  Group decision making under multiple criteria , 1987 .

[16]  Chao Wang,et al.  A decision support model for group decision making with hesitant fuzzy preference relations , 2015, Knowl. Based Syst..

[17]  Ido Millet,et al.  The Effectiveness of Alternative Preference Elicitation Methods in the Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1997 .

[18]  José Luis García-Lapresta,et al.  Individual-valued preferences and their aggregation: consistency analysis in a real case , 2005, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[19]  Zbigniew Switalski Rationality of fuzzy reciprocal preference relations , 1999, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[20]  Oscar Castillo,et al.  Optimization of fuzzy control systems with different variants of Particle Swarm Optimization , 2013, 2013 IEEE Workshop on Hybrid Intelligent Models and Applications (HIMA).

[21]  Yu Lin,et al.  Developing a dynamic neighborhood structure for an adaptive hybrid simulated annealing - tabu search algorithm to solve the symmetrical traveling salesman problem , 2016, Appl. Soft Comput..

[22]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  Some issues on consistency of fuzzy preference relations , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[23]  Salman Mohagheghi,et al.  Particle Swarm Optimization: Basic Concepts, Variants and Applications in Power Systems , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation.

[24]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  Consistency of Reciprocal Preference Relations , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Fuzzy Systems Conference.

[25]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  Group Decision-Making Model With Incomplete Fuzzy Preference Relations Based on Additive Consistency , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics).

[26]  T. Tanino Fuzzy preference orderings in group decision making , 1984 .

[27]  Witold Pedrycz,et al.  A review of soft consensus models in a fuzzy environment , 2014, Inf. Fusion.

[28]  Shui Yu,et al.  Consensus Building in a Local Context for the AHP-GDM With the Individual Numerical Scale and Prioritization Method , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[29]  Yejun Xu,et al.  The ordinal consistency of a fuzzy preference relation , 2013, Inf. Sci..

[30]  J. Montero,et al.  Fuzzy rationality measures , 1994 .

[31]  Francisco Chiclana,et al.  A new measure of consensus with reciprocal preference relations: The correlation consensus degree , 2016, Knowl. Based Syst..

[32]  Enrique Herrera-Viedma,et al.  Confidence-consistency driven group decision making approach with incomplete reciprocal intuitionistic preference relations , 2015, Knowl. Based Syst..

[33]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  A note on the reciprocity in the aggregation of fuzzy preference relations using OWA operators , 2003, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[34]  Doina Bucur,et al.  Optimizing groups of colluding strong attackers in mobile urban communication networks with evolutionary algorithms , 2016, Appl. Soft Comput..

[35]  Zbigniew Michalewicz,et al.  Stability Analysis of the Particle Swarm Optimization Without Stagnation Assumption , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation.