A preliminary study of reliability of impedance measurement to detect iatrogenic initial pedicle perforation (in the porcine model)

Accidental perforation of the vertebral pedicle wall is a well-known complication associated with standard approach of pedicle screw insertion. Depending on detection criteria, more than 20% of screws are reported misplaced. Serious clinical consequences, from dysesthesia to paraplegia, although not common, may result from these misplaced screws. Many techniques have been described to address this issue such as somatosensory evoked potentials, electromyography, surgical navigation, etc. Each of these techniques presents advantages and drawbacks, none is simple and ergonomic. A new drilling tool was evaluated which allows for instant detection of pedicle perforation by emission of variable beeps. This new device is based on two original principles: the device is integrated in the drilling or screwing tool, the technology allows real-time detection of perforation through two independent parameters, impedance variation and evoked muscular contractions. A preliminary animal study was conducted to assess the safety and efficacy of this system based upon electrical conductivity. A total of 168 manual pedicle drillings followed by insertion of implants were performed in 11 young porcine lumbar and thoracic spines. The presence or absence of perforation detection, which defines the reliability of the device, was correlated with necropsic examination of the spines. Using this protocol the device demonstrated 100% positive predictive value, 96% negative predictive value, 100% specificity, and 97% sensitivity. Of 168 drillings there were three (1.79%) false-negatives, leading to a minor effraction, cranially in the intervertebral disks, nine (5.36%) screw threads breaching the vertebral cortex when inserting screws, although preparation of the holes did not indicate any perforation, 34 (36%) breaches detected by the instrument and not detected by the surgeon. These results confirm that the impedance variation detection capability of this device offers a simple and effective means to detect perforation in vertebral pedicle, prior to insertion of pedicle screws. Due to the porcine nerve root anatomy, it was not possible to evaluate the added benefit of cross-linking impedance and EMG detection. A future clinical study may further explore the subject of current study.

[1]  S. C. Açıkbaş,et al.  The effect of transpedicular screw misplacement on late spinal stability , 2003, Acta Neurochirurgica.

[2]  Barry W. McDonald,et al.  Centralization as a predictor of provocation discography results in chronic low back pain, and the influence of disability and distress on diagnostic power. , 2005, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[3]  S. Esses,et al.  Complications associated with the technique of pedicle screw fixation. A selected survey of ABS members. , 1993, Spine.

[4]  D L Myers,et al.  Complications of Lumbar Spinal Fusion with Transpedicular Instrumentation , 1992, Spine.

[5]  T. Albert,et al.  Placement of pedicle screws in the human cadaveric cervical spine: comparative accuracy of three techniques. , 2000, Spine.

[6]  N. Glossop,et al.  Computer‐Aided Pedicle Screw Placement Using Frameless Stereotaxis , 1996, Spine.

[7]  D. Bradford,et al.  Complications of the Variable Screw Plate Pedicle Screw Fixation , 1991, Spine.

[8]  H. Halm,et al.  Pedicle Screw Instrumentation of the Thoracic Spine in Idiopathic Scoliosis , 1997, Spine.

[9]  J. Moran,et al.  A Morphometric Study of Human Lumbar and Selected Thoracic Vertebrae , 1987, Spine.

[10]  S R Garfin,et al.  Placement of pedicle screws in the thoracic spine. Part II: An anatomical and radiographic assessment. , 1995, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[11]  R. Yeasting,et al.  Anatomic Considerations of Pedicle Screw Placement in the Thoracic Spine: Roy‐Camille Technique Versus Open‐Lamina Technique , 1998, Spine.

[12]  G B Jacobs,et al.  Evaluation with evoked and spontaneous electromyography during lumbar instrumentation: a prospective study. , 1997, Journal of neurosurgery.

[13]  P. Papagelopoulos,et al.  Evaluation of pedicle screw position in thoracic and lumbar spine fixation using plain radiographs and computed tomography. A prospective study of 35 patients. , 1999, Spine.

[14]  M M Panjabi,et al.  Thoracic Human Vertebrae Quantitative Three‐Dimensional Anatomy , 1991, Spine.

[15]  M. Panjabi,et al.  The effects of pedicle screw adjustments on neural spaces in burst fracture surgery. , 2000, Spine.

[16]  J. Bendo,et al.  Somatosensory evoked potential monitoring of lumbar pedicle screw placement for in situ posterior spinal fusion. , 2003, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[17]  R Roy-Camille,et al.  Plating of thoracic, thoracolumbar, and lumbar injuries with pedicle screw plates. , 1986, The Orthopedic clinics of North America.

[18]  R. Winter,et al.  Complications associated with pedicle screws. , 1999, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[19]  S. Gertzbein,et al.  Accuracy of Pedicular Screw Placement In Vivo , 1990, Spine.