Theatre of Use

Demonstrations are a universal form of technical exchange in the world of information technology (IT), but they get almost no mention in its practical guides and theoretical accounts. To understand their structure, role and status better, an interview study was carried out with experienced practitioners focusing on commercial presentations of software to large organizations. Drawing on Goffman's frame analysis, the present-day IT demonstration is seen in relation to other members of a broader class of technoscientific displays, particularly those of pre-20th century science epitomized by the famous performances of Boyle, Faraday and others. The focus of the account here is on how demonstrations are experienced by participants and what this might reveal about the manner of knowledge production that they make possible. Following a dramaturgical metaphor, the IT demonstration is understood as a Theatre of Use in which a possible sociotechnical system is represented dramatically through the actions of the demonstrator interacting with the technology. What comes to be known through the performance is seen to be multiply-framed and to encompass various ways of knowing.

[1]  Matthew Jones,et al.  The expert system: constructing expertise in an IT/management consultancy , 2003, Inf. Organ..

[2]  David Knight,et al.  Public Understanding of Science: A History of Communicating Scientific Ideas , 2006 .

[3]  Theo Vurdubakis,et al.  The vision thing: constructing technology and the future in management advice , 2002 .

[4]  Arthur Miller.  Arthur Miller's Collected plays : with an introduction , 1957 .

[5]  Henning Schmidgen,et al.  Science on stage : expert advice as public drama , 2003 .

[6]  J. Krige.  How Users Matter: The Co-Construction of Users and Technology , 2006 .

[7]  Richard Baskerville.  The LEO principle: perspectives on 50 years of business computing , 2003, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[8]  Anders W Johansson,et al.  Professionalism and politics in management consultancy work , 2001 .

[9]  Jeanette Blomberg,et al.  Working artefacts: ethnomethods of the prototype. , 2002, The British journal of sociology.

[10]  Neil Pollock,et al.  Generification Work in the Production of Organizational Software Packages , 2022 .

[11]  David Gooding,et al.  Experiment and the Making of Meaning , 1990 .

[12]  T. Dolan.  The Collected Works of Samuel Taylor Coleridge: Biographia Literaria or Biographical Sketches of My Literary Life and Opinions , 1986 .

[13]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Using Technology and Constituting Structures: A Practice Lens for Studying Technology in Organizations , 2000, Theory in CSCW.

[14]  S. Shapin.  The Invisible Technician , 1989 .

[15]  C. Lawrence.  The pasteurization of France , 1990, Medical History.

[16]  Harold Maurice Collins,et al.  Public Experiments and Displays of Virtuosity: The Core-Set Revisited , 1988 .

[17]  D. Gooding.  Experiment and the Making of Meaning: Human Agency in Scientific Observation and Experiment , 1990 .

[18]  S. Shapin.  The House of Experiment in Seventeenth-Century England , 1988, Isis.

[19]  Anselm L. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research : techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory , 1998 .

[20]  Karen Barad.  Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter , 2003, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society.

[21]  Morris Berman,et al.  Social Change and Scientific Organization: The Royal Institution, 1799-1844 , 1978 .

[22]  David Gooding,et al.  Faraday Rediscovered: Essays on the Life and Work of Michael Faraday, 1791-1867 , 1989 .

[23]  E. Goffman.  Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience , 1974 .

[24]  David Gooding,et al.  ‘In Nature’s School’: Faraday as an Experimentalist , 1985 .

[25]  Robin Williams,et al.  Technology Choice and its Performance : Toward a Sociology of Software Package Procurement , 2009 .