The Benefits of Cooperative Learning Arrangements in Second Language Instruction

Abstract This paper identifies some of the advantages that cooperative learning arrangements offer in second language and bilingual instruction. There are six main benefits (two linguistic, two curricular and two social): (1) increased frequency and variety of second language practice through different types of interaction; (2) possibility for development or use of the first language in ways that support cognitive development and increased second language skills; (3) opportunities to integrate language with content instruction; (4) inclusion of a greater variety of curricular materials to stimulate language use as well as concept learning; (5) freedom for language teachers to master new professional skills, particularly those emphasizing communication; and (6) opportunities for students to act as resources for each other and, thus, assume a more active role in learning. Pertinent empirical findings from various settings of linguistic diversity are presented and theoretical foundations summarized to show t...

[1]  B. Mohan.  Language and Content , 1985 .

[2]  N. Webb.  Student Interaction and Learning in Small Groups , 1982 .

[3]  Stephen J. Gaies,et al.  Peer Involvement in Language Learning , 1985 .

[4]  S. Krashen,et al.  The Natural Approach: Language Acquisition in the Classroom , 1983 .

[5]  Marguerite Ann Snow,et al.  Content-based second language instruction , 1989 .

[6]  Jim Cummins,et al.  Empowering minority students: A framework for intervention. , 1986 .

[7]  M. Swain.  Communicative competence : Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development , 1985 .

[8]  H. P. Edwards,et al.  Second-Language Acquisition through Subject-Matter Learning: A Study of Sheltered Psychology Classes at the University of Ottawa. , 1984 .

[9]  Yael Bejarano,et al.  A Cooperative Small‐Group Methodology in the Language Classroom , 1987 .

[10]  JoAnn Crandall.  ESL through Content-Area Instruction: Mathematics, Science, Social Studies. Language in Education: Theory and Practice, No. 69. , 1987 .

[11]  Noreen M. Webb,et al.  10 – Gender Differences in Small-Group Interaction and Achievement in High- and Low-Achieving Classes* , 1985 .

[12]  Patricia Ann Porter.  Variations in the conversations of adult learners of English as a function of the proficiency level of the participants , 1983 .

[13]  Michael H. Long,et al.  Group Work, Interlanguage Talk,and Second Language Acquisition. , 1985 .

[14]  Fred Genesee,et al.  The Baby and the Bathwater or What Immersion Has to Say About Bilingual Education: Teaching and learning in bilingual education—Significant immersion instructional features , 1986 .

[15]  Michael H. Long.  INPUT, INTERACTION, AND SECOND‐LANGUAGE ACQUISITION , 1981 .

[16]  Robert D. Milk.  The Changing Role of ESL in Bilingual Education , 1985 .