Expert knowledge as mnemonic cues

It is proposed that expert knowledge can operate as a cognitive cueing structure for the acquisition and retention of new information in memory. Two experiments are reported which demonstrate that expert knowledge about football and clothing can act as mnemonic cues for the recall of information newly associated with that knowledge. In Experiment 1 expert terms from the domains of football and clothing and those neutral nouns paired with them were both better recalled by experts than by non-experts. In Experiment 2 passages containing information contrary to factual knowledge about football and clothing were recalled better by experts than by non-experts, in spite of the fact that information in the passages contradicted what the experts already knew. The results of the two experiments were interpreted as showing that expert knowledge provides mental cues that have desirable mnemonic properties such as constructibility, associability, discriminability and invertibility. Also, the interpretation of expert knowledge as a cognitive cueing structure is compared to Ausubel's ideas regarding advance organizers.

[1]  A. Paivio.  Imagery and verbal processes , 1972 .

[2]  Barbara Hayes-Roth,et al.  The use of schemata in the acquisition and transfer of knowledge , 1979, Cognitive Psychology.

[3]  John B. Black,et al.  Scripts in memory for text , 1979, Cognitive Psychology.

[4]  J. Novak,et al.  Educational Psychology: A Cognitive View , 1969 .

[5]  P. Johnson-Laird.  Mental models , 1989 .

[6]  A. Paivio.  Mental imagery in associative learning and memory , 1969 .

[7]  G. Bower,et al.  Mnemonic elaboration in multilist learning , 1972 .

[8]  Gordon H. Bower,et al.  Remembering script-based text , 1982 .

[9]  F. Yates.  The Art of Memory , 1969 .

[10]  Francis S. Bellezza,et al.  Mnemonic devices and natural memory , 1978 .

[11]  F. Bellezza.  Mnemonic Devices: Classification, Characteristics, and Criteria , 1981 .

[12]  D. Ausubel.  The use of advance organizers in the learning and retention of meaningful verbal material. , 1960 .

[13]  Proactive inhibition in the forgetting of meaningful school material. , 1958 .

[14]  E. Tulving.  Elements of episodic memory , 1983 .

[15]  F. Bellezza.  Updating memory using mnemonic devices , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.

[16]  L. Hasher,et al.  Automatic and effortful processes in memory. , 1979 .

[17]  G. Miller,et al.  Plans and the structure of behavior , 1960 .

[18]  John R. Anderson.  Language, Memory, and Thought , 1976 .

[19]  H. Simon,et al.  Perception in chess , 1973 .

[20]  F. Bellezza.  Mental Cues And Verbal Reports In Learning , 1986 .

[21]  H. Simon,et al.  The mind's eye in chess. , 1973 .

[22]  B. Underwood.  Interference and forgetting. , 1957, Psychological review.

[23]  Richard M. Shiffrin,et al.  12 – Memory Search1 , 1970 .

[24]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  The impact of a schema on comprehension and memory , 1982 .

[25]  Richard C. Anderson.  Schema-Directed Processes in Language Comprehension , 1978 .

[26]  F. Bellezza.  Mnemonic Devices and Memory Schemas , 1987 .

[27]  Roger C. Schank,et al.  SCRIPTS, PLANS, GOALS, AND UNDERSTANDING , 1988 .

[28]  John R. Anderson,et al.  RECOGNITION AND RETRIEVAL PROCESSES IN FREE RECALL , 1972 .

[29]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  Fact retrieval and the paradox of interference , 1978, Cognitive Psychology.