Health Professionals' Attitudes to Videoconferencing in Paediatric Health-Care

This study surveyed staff involved in paediatric health-care in the state of New South Wales. Questionnaires were sent to: 139 medical professionals in paediatric public health; 157 medical professionals in private practice; 179 nurses; and 125 allied health staff. There were 188 completed surveys (31%). The results showed higher endorsement of videoconferencing for educational or psychosocial applications than for patient management or treatment planning. Medical professionals (especially those in private practice) tended to give the lowest ratings for the potential usefulness of telemedicine. Apart from ratings for various effects of time and distance in the work setting, rural and non-rural professionals generally showed no significant differences, especially in attitudes to and understanding of telemedicine. Hierarchical regression analysis showed that ratings for the future use of videoconferencing (if it were available), in particular ratings for future use of telecommunications technology (e.g. email, telephone conferencing), were determined by factors largely independent of access to telemedicine. The data assist in interpreting the under-use of videoconferencing in health-care.

[1]  Intelligent health systems and third millennium medicine in Australia. , 2000, Telemedicine journal : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[2]  I Blignault Multipoint videoconferencing in health: a review of three years' experience in Queensland, Australia. , 2000, Telemedicine journal : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[3]  N T Ellis,et al.  When protocols fail: technical evaluation, biomedical knowledge, and the social production of 'facts' about a telemedicine clinic. , 2001, Social science & medicine.

[4]  Patrick Y. K. Chau,et al.  Physician acceptance of telemedicine technology: an empirical investigation. , 1999, Topics in health information management.

[5]  B. Crouse,et al.  Rural Minnesota family physicians' attitudes toward telemedicine. , 1995, Minnesota medicine.

[6]  P. Wallace,et al.  General practitioner participants in a telemedicine trial: comparisons with their peers , 2001, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[7]  O. Ferrer-Roca,et al.  What do physicians think of telemedicine? A survey in different European regions , 1996, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[8]  P. Whitten,et al.  Telemedicine and patient satisfaction: current status and future directions. , 2000, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[9]  P. Whitten,et al.  Telemedicine for Patient Consultation: Factors affecting Use by Rural Primary-Care Physicians in Kansas , 1995, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[10]  Chih-Ping Wei,et al.  A survey of physicians’ acceptance of telemedicine , 1998, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[11]  J. Wyatt Commentary: Telemedicine trials—clinical pull or technology push? , 1996 .

[12]  I. Aas Working with telemedicine: User characteristics and attitudes , 2000, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.