Modeling epistemic subsurface reservoir uncertainty using a reverse Wiener jump–diffusion process

Abstract This paper develops a mathematical model of how subsurface reservoir uncertainty, in particular estimated ultimate recovery (EUR), can evolve over time. The model assumes that epistemic uncertainty reduces over time as information from seismic surveys, appraisal wells and production logs is used to improve EUR estimates. A reverse Wiener diffusion process with superimposed jumps is developed to capture the exponential decrease in estimate volatility due to learning but also the existence of sudden jumps in estimates due to unexpected discoveries such as reservoir fault lines or aquifer support. The model can be applied to quantify the evolution of reservoir uncertainty over time during appraisal and planning of new oil and gas development projects. Appreciation Factor data from 34 North Sea fields is used to calibrate and validate the model showing that the evolution of EUR estimates is predicted with 82.4% of validation data points within the simulated P10 and P90 uncertainty envelope, which should theoretically cover 80% of data points if there is no model error. The key parameters in the model are the initial EUR distribution, as well as the exponential decay rates for EUR volatility and the likelihood of occurrence of discrete jumps.

[1]  Ferruh Demirmen.  Reserves Estimation: The Challenge for the Industry , 2007 .

[2]  R. Voeks.  Real Options: Managerial Flexibility and Strategy in Resource Allocation , 1997 .

[3]  Denis José Schiozer,et al.  Risk Analysis Applied To Petroleum Exploration And Production: An Overview , 2004 .

[4]  T. Copeland.  Real Options: A Practitioner's Guide , 2001 .

[5]  Benoit Couet,et al.  Incorporating technical uncertainty in real option valuation of oil projects , 2004 .

[6]  Zsay-Shing Lin,et al.  Stochastic analysis of production decline data for production prediction and reserves estimation , 1999 .

[7]  D. Siegel,et al.  Option Valuation of Claims on Real Assets: The Case of Offshore Petroleum Leases , 1988 .

[8]  Fathi Abid,et al.  A methodology to evaluate an option to defer an oilfield development , 2009 .

[9]  Saul B. Suslick,et al.  Estimation of volatility of selected oil production projects , 2006 .

[10]  R. C. Merton,et al.  Theory of Rational Option Pricing , 2015, World Scientific Reference on Contingent Claims Analysis in Corporate Finance.

[11]  Marco Antonio Guimarães Dias,et al.  Valuation of exploration and production assets: an overview of real options models , 2004 .

[12]  S. Subbeya,et al.  Prediction under uncertainty in reservoir modeling , 2004 .

[13]  Antônio Guimarães Dias,et al.  “ PETROLEUM CONCESSIONS WITH EXTENDIBLE OPTIONS USING MEAN REVERSION WITH JUMPS TO MODEL OIL PRICES ” Marco , 1999 .

[14]  Mark Graham,et al.  Hydrocarbon Exploration and Production , 1998 .

[15]  J. J. Arps.  Analysis of Decline Curves , 1945 .

[16]  Emmanuel Manceau,et al.  Uncertainty management: From geological scenarios to production scheme optimization , 2004 .

[17]  Denis José Schiozer,et al.  A new methodology to reduce uncertainties in reservoir simulation models using observed data and sampling techniques , 2010 .

[18]  Daniel P. Thunnissen,et al.  Uncertainty Classification for the Design and Development of Complex Systems , 2003 .

[19]  J. J. Arps.  ESTIMATION of PRIMARY OIL RESERVES , 1956 .

[20]  F. Black,et al.  The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities , 1973, Journal of Political Economy.

[21]  J. Rice.  Mathematical Statistics and Data Analysis , 1988 .

[22]  Jef Caers,et al.  Assessment of Global Uncertainty for Early Appraisal of Hydrocarbon Fields , 2004 .

[23]  G. C. Watkins.  Characteristics of North Sea oil reserve appreciation , 2002 .