Seeing Like a Survey

This article explores a performative understanding of social science method. First, it draws on STS to consider the plausibility of the claim that research methods generate not only representations of reality, but also the realities those representations depict. Second, it undertakes an archaeology of a major survey — a Eurobarometer investigation of European citizens' attitudes to farm animal welfare — in order to explore the character of its performativity. Finally, it considers some of the implications of the performativity of research tools for the future of methods in social science.

[1]  Roger Burrows,et al.  The Coming Crisis of Empirical Sociology , 2007, Sociology.

[2]  David M. Smith.  For Space , 2006, Ordinary Blessings.

[3]  Statistics in Britain 1865–1930. The Social Construction of Scientific Knowledge , 1982 .

[4]  John Law,et al.  And if the Global Were Small and Noncoherent? Method, Complexity, and the Baroque , 2004 .

[5]  A. Mol,et al.  Shifting Sexes, Moving Stories: Feminist/Constructivist Dialogues , 1995 .

[6]  D. Dennis,et al.  Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed , 1998 .

[7]  Helen Verran,et al.  Science and an African logic , 2001 .

[8]  B. Paskins.  Spheres of Justice: a defence of pluralism and equality By Michael Robertson Oxford: Martin Robertson, 1983, xviii + 345 pp., £15. , 1984, Philosophy.

[9]  Donna Harawy.  Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective , 2022, Philosophical Literary Journal Logos.

[10]  H. Rheinberger.  Toward a History of Epistemic Things: Synthesizing Proteins in the Test Tube , 1997 .

[11]  James C. Scott,et al.  Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed , 1999 .

[12]  D. MacKenzie,et al.  Statistics in Britain, 1865-1930 : the social construction of scientific knowledge , 1982 .

[13]  Ruth McNally,et al.  Sociomics! Using the IssueCrawler to map, monitor and engage with the global proteomics research network , 2005, Proteomics.

[14]  A. Mol.  Ontological Politics. A Word and Some Questions , 1999 .

[15]  A. Barry.  Political Machines: Governing a Technological Society , 2001 .

[16]  B. Latour,et al.  Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts , 1979 .

[17]  A. Mol.  The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice , 2003 .

[18]  J. Law.  After Method: Mess in Social Science Research , 2004 .

[19]  M. Kearnes,et al.  Urban Wild Things: A Cosmopolitical Experiment , 2005 .

[20]  Ingunn Moser,et al.  Making Alzheimer’s disease matter. Enacting, interfering and doing politics of nature , 2008 .

[21]  Michel Callon,et al.  On Interests and their Transformation: Enrolment and Counter-Enrolment , 1982 .

[22]  John Law,et al.  Situating Technoscience: An Inquiry into Spatialities , 2001 .

[23]  Norway. , 1988, Revue scientifique et technique.

[24]  Ilana Feldman.  Rule of Experts: Egypt, Techno-Politics, Modernity , 2004 .

[25]  J. Krantz,et al.  The birth of the clinic. An archaeology of medical perception , 1975, Medical History.

[26]  Davide Nicolini,et al.  Knowing in Organizations: A Practice-Based Approach , 2003 .

[27]  M. Foucault.  The archaeology of knowledge , 1970 .

[28]  Stefan Hirschauer.  Performing Sexes and Genders in Medical Practices , 2020, Differences in Medicine.

[29]  M. Callon.  Introduction: The Embeddedness of Economic Markets in Economics , 1998 .

[30]  Vicky Singleton,et al.  Feminism, Sociology of Scientific Knowledge and Postmodernism: Politics, Theory and Me , 1996 .

[31]  Helen Verran.  Re-imagining land ownership in Australia , 1998 .

[32]  J. Murdoch,et al.  UK Market for Animal Welfare Friendly Products. Market Structure, Survey of Available Products and Quality Assurance Schemes , 2006 .

[33]  M. Foucault,et al.  The birth of the clinic : an archaeology of medical perception , 1974 .

[34]  G. Gutting.  The archaeology of knowledge , 1989 .

[35]  D. Headrick.  Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life. By Theodore M. Porter. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1995. Pp. xiv, 310 , 1996, The Journal of Economic History.

[36]  N. Rose,et al.  Do the social sciences create phenomena?: the example of public opinion research. , 1999, The British journal of sociology.

[37]  Helen Verran,et al.  Science and an African logic , 2001 .

[38]  M. Mendl,et al.  Benefits of implementing the animal welfare improvement strategies developed in SP3 / Assuring animal welfare: from societal concerns to implementation , 2007 .

[39]  Csr Young,et al.  How to Do Things With Words , 2009 .

[40]  L. Thévenot.  L'action au pluriel : sociologie des régimes d'engagement , 2006 .

[41]  Paul D. Oldham,et al.  Biodiversity and the Patent System: An Introduction to Research Methods , 2009 .

[42]  R. D'amico.  Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison , 1978, Telos.

[43]  M. Savage,et al.  Editors' Introduction: Reinscribing British Sociology: Some Critical Reflections , 2008 .

[44]  J. Austin.  How to do things with words , 1962 .

[45]  J. Murdoch,et al.  Animals and ambivalence: governing farm animal welfare in the European food sector , 2005 .

[46]  John Law,et al.  Allegory and its others , 2003 .

[47]  M. Foucault,et al.  Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. , 1978 .

[48]  M. S. Bartlett,et al.  Statistics in Britain 1865-1930. The Social Construction of Scientific Knowledge. , 1982 .