Optical imaging of cancer metastasis to bone marrow: a mouse model of minimal residual disease.

The development of novel anti-cancer strategies requires more sensitive and less invasive methods to detect and monitor in vivo minimal residual disease in cancer models. Bone marrow metastases are indirectly detected by radiography as osteolytic and/or osteosclerotic lesions. Marrow micrometastases elude radiographic detection and, therefore, more sensitive methods are needed for their direct identification. Injection of cancer cells into the left cardiac ventricle of mice closely mimics micrometastatic spread. When luciferase-transfected cells are used, whole-body bioluminescent reporter imaging can detect microscopic bone marrow metastases of approximately 0.5 mm(3) volume, a size below the limit in which tumors need to induce angiogenesis for further growth. This sensitivity translates into early detection of intramedullary tumor growth, preceding the appearance of a radiologically evident osteolysis by approximately 2 weeks. Bioluminescent reporter imaging also enables continuous monitoring in the same animal of growth kinetics for each metastatic site and guides end-point analyses specifically to the bones affected by metastatic growth. This model will accelerate the understanding of the molecular events in metastasis and the evaluation of novel therapies aiming at repressing initial stages of metastatic growth.

[1]  J. Capeau,et al.  Haemoglobin interferes with the ex vivo luciferase luminescence assay: consequence for detection of luciferase reporter gene expression in vivo , 2000, Gene Therapy.

[2]  C. Contag,et al.  Use of reporter genes for optical measurements of neoplastic disease in vivo. , 2000, Neoplasia.

[3]  M. Olivé,et al.  Breast tumor cell lines from pleural effusions. , 1974, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[4]  R. Negrin,et al.  The use of the polymerase chain reaction for the detection of minimal residual malignant disease [editorial] , 1991 .

[5]  E. Thompson,et al.  Human breast cancer cell metastasis to long bone and soft organs of nude mice: a quantitative assay , 1997, Clinical & Experimental Metastasis.

[6]  T. Yoneda,et al.  Osteolytic bone metastasis in breast cancer , 2004, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[7]  S. Braun,et al.  Micrometastatic bone marrow involvement: detection and prognostic significance , 1999, Medical oncology.

[8]  C. Contag,et al.  Noninvasive assessment of tumor cell proliferation in animal models. , 1999, Neoplasia.

[9]  C. Wiltschke,et al.  Detection of minimal residual disease in patients with cancer: a review of techniques, clinical implications, and emerging therapeutic consequences. , 2000, Cancer detection and prevention.

[10]  T. Walsh,et al.  REVIEWS — Tumour micrometastases: the influence of angiogenesis , 2000 .

[11]  T. Tong,et al.  Cancer statistics, 1993 , 1993, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[12]  P. Carmeliet,et al.  Angiogenesis in cancer and other diseases , 2000, Nature.

[13]  R. Negrin,et al.  The use of the polymerase chain reaction for the detection of minimal residual malignant disease. , 1991, Blood.

[14]  S. Nordeen,et al.  Luciferase reporter gene vectors for analysis of promoters and enhancers. , 1988, BioTechniques.

[15]  C. Klein The biology and analysis of single disseminated tumour cells. , 2000, Trends in cell biology.

[16]  H. Shimada,et al.  Whole-body optical imaging of green fluorescent protein-expressing tumors and metastases. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  L. Chung,et al.  Osteomimetic properties of prostate cancer cells: A hypothesis supporting the predilection of prostate cancer metastasis and growth in the bone environment , 1999, The Prostate.

[18]  T. Yoneda Cellular and molecular basis of preferential metastasis of breast cancer to bone , 2000, Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association.

[19]  R. Dickson,et al.  Osseous Complications of Malignancy , 1980 .

[20]  D. Hanahan,et al.  Patterns and Emerging Mechanisms of the Angiogenic Switch during Tumorigenesis , 1996, Cell.

[21]  P. Hokland,et al.  Fate of tumor cells injected into left ventricle of heart in BALB/c mice: role of natural killer cells. , 1988, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[22]  Y. Chang,et al.  A model for osseous metastasis of human breast cancer established by intrafemur injection of the MDA-MB-435 cells in nude mice. , 1997, Anticancer research.

[23]  R. Baggs,et al.  A murine model of experimental metastasis to bone and bone marrow. , 1988, Cancer research.

[24]  I. Fidler,et al.  Critical determinants of cancer metastasis: rationale for therapy , 1999, Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology.

[25]  Paul J. Williams,et al.  A Bone‐Seeking Clone Exhibits Different Biological Properties from the MDA‐MB‐231 Parental Human Breast Cancer Cells and a Brain‐Seeking Clone In Vivo and In Vitro , 2001, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[26]  H. Vloedgraven,et al.  Monitoring Metastatic Behavior of Human Tumor Cells in Mice with Species‐Specific Polymerase Chain Reaction: Elevated Expression of Angiogenesis and Bone Resorption Stimulators by Breast Cancer in Bone Metastases , 2001, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[27]  C. Hirsch-Ginsberg Detection of minimal residual disease: relevance for diagnosis and treatment of human malignancies. , 1998, Annual review of medicine.