Similarity awareness: Using context sensing to support connectedness in intra-family communication

This research motivates and evaluates the notion of similarity awareness as a means to enhance connectedness between remote family members. Similarity awareness refers to notifying connected individuals when they are engaged in similar activities. This idea is illustrated with the design and evaluation of MatchMaker an application targeting the needs of young adults who have recently left home and their parents, the so called 'empty nesters'. The potential affective benefits of similarity awareness are evaluated in a laboratory experiment involving 23 pairs of a parent and a child, showing strong indications that similarity awareness can enhance social connectedness. A proof of concept of MatchMaker was implemented where it is shown that combined audio and video scene analysis can identify reliably six activities typical for domestic life.

[1]  Wendy E. Mackay,et al.  Sharing empty moments: design for remote couples , 2009, CHI.

[2]  Pieter Jan Stappers,et al.  Gust of me: reconnecting mother and son , 2004, IEEE Pervasive Computing.

[3]  Panos Markopoulos,et al.  Aurama: caregiver awareness for living independently with an augmented picture frame display , 2010, AI & SOCIETY.

[4]  Natalia Romero Herrera,et al.  Grounding interpersonal privacy in mediated settings , 2009, GROUP.

[5]  Bashar Nuseibeh,et al.  Keeping ubiquitous computing to yourself: A practical model for user control of privacy , 2005, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[6]  Elizabeth D. Mynatt,et al.  Digital family portraits: supporting peace of mind for extended family members , 2001, CHI.

[7]  Terry E. Duncan,et al.  Psychometric properties of the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory in a competitive sport setting: a confirmatory factor analysis. , 1989, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[8]  William W. Gaver,et al.  Design: Cultural probes , 1999, INTR.

[9]  F. Heider.  The psychology of interpersonal relations , 1958 .

[10]  S. Asch.  Forming impressions of personality. , 1946, Journal of Abnormal Psychology.

[11]  Debby Hindus,et al.  Casablanca: designing social communication devices for the home , 2001, CHI 2001.

[12]  A. Aron,et al.  Inclusion of Other in the Self Scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness , 1992 .

[13]  John Short,et al.  The social psychology of telecommunications , 1976 .

[14]  Abigail Sellen,et al.  Desiring to be in touch in a changing communications landscape: attitudes of older adults , 2009, CHI.

[15]  Anind K. Dey,et al.  From awareness to connectedness: the design and deployment of presence displays , 2006, CHI.

[16]  Martin R. Gibbs,et al.  SynchroMate: a phatic technology for mediating intimacy , 2005, DUX '05.

[17]  Kazuhiro Kuwabara,et al.  Connectedness oriented communication: fostering a sense of connectedness to augment social relationships , 2002, Proceedings 2002 Symposium on Applications and the Internet (SAINT 2002).

[18]  Martin R. Gibbs,et al.  The Magic Box and Collage: Responding to the challenge of distributed intergenerational play , 2009, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[19]  Yvonne de Kort,et al.  Social connectedness: concept and measurement , 2009, Intelligent Environments.

[20]  Panos Markopoulos,et al.  Supporting peace of mind and independent living with the Aurama awareness system , 2011, J. Ambient Intell. Smart Environ..

[21]  Wijnand A. IJsselsteijn,et al.  Social Presence in a Home Tele-Application , 2001, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[22]  Alex Pentland,et al.  Social serendipity: mobilizing social software , 2005, IEEE Pervasive Computing.

[23]  Caifeng Shan,et al.  An event-based approach to multi-modal activity modeling and recognition , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications (PerCom).

[24]  R. Baumeister,et al.  The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. , 1995, Psychological bulletin.

[25]  A. van Knippenberg,et al.  Mimicry and Prosocial Behavior , 2004, Psychological science.

[26]  T. Chartrand,et al.  The chameleon effect: the perception-behavior link and social interaction. , 1999, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[27]  Hiroshi Ishii,et al.  LumiTouch: an emotional communication device , 2001, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[28]  J. Burger,et al.  What a Coincidence! The Effects of Incidental Similarity on Compliance , 2004, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[29]  J. F. Kelley,et al.  An iterative design methodology for user-friendly natural language office information applications , 1984, TOIS.

[30]  Wijnand A. IJsselsteijn,et al.  Measuring Affective Benefits and Costs of Mediated Awareness: Development and Validation of the ABC-Questionnaire , 2009, Awareness Systems.

[31]  Boris E. R. de Ruyter,et al.  Daily Activities Diarist: Supporting Aging in Place with Semantically Enriched Narratives , 2007, INTERACT.

[32]  Wijnand A. IJsselsteijn,et al.  Social presence and group attraction: exploring the effects of awareness systems in the home , 2004, Cognition, Technology & Work.

[33]  Koji Tsukada,et al.  SyncDecor: communication appliances for virtual cohabitation , 2008, AVI '08.

[34]  Carman Neustaedter,et al.  The family window: the design and evaluation of a domestic media space , 2010, CHI.

[35]  Konstantinos Grivas,et al.  Digital Selves: Devices for intimate communications between homes , 2006, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[36]  Panos Markopoulos,et al.  Design of an instrument for the evaluation of communication technologies with children , 2010, IDC.

[37]  Bonnie A. Nardi,et al.  Interaction and outeraction: instant messaging in action , 2000, CSCW '00.

[38]  Robin L. Hill,et al.  Keeping In Touch: Talking to Older People about Computers and Communication , 2007 .

[39]  Alex S. Taylor,et al.  Locating Family Values: A Field Trial of the Whereabouts Clock , 2007, UbiComp.

[40]  Richard Harper,et al.  Celebratory technology: new directions for food research in HCI , 2008, CHI.

[41]  Wijnand A. IJsselsteijn,et al.  Sharing experiences through awareness systems in the home , 2005, Interact. Comput..

[42]  Panos Markopoulos,et al.  Measuring affective benefits and costs of awareness systems supporting intimate social networks , 2004 .

[43]  Abigail Sellen,et al.  Designing for elders: exploring the complexity of relationships in later life , 2008, BCS HCI.

[44]  Wijnand A. IJsselsteijn,et al.  Keeping in touch with the family: home and away with the ASTRA awareness system , 2004, CHI EA '04.

[45]  Panos Markopoulos,et al.  Busy families' awareness needs , 2009, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[46]  Jay Lundell,et al.  New Perspectives on Ubiquitous Computing from Ethnographic Study of Elders with Cognitive Decline , 2003, UbiComp.

[47]  Wijnand A. IJsselsteijn,et al.  Connecting the family with awareness systems , 2007, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[48]  Wendy E. Mackay,et al.  Awareness Systems - Advances in Theory, Methodology and Design , 2009, Human-Computer Interaction Series.