Sentinel-2 time series analysis for monitoring multi-taxon biodiversity in mountain beech forests

Biodiversity monitoring represents a major challenge to supporting proper forest ecosystem management and biodiversity conservation. The latter is indeed shifting in recent years from single-species to multi-taxon approaches. However, multi-taxonomic studies are quite rare due to the effort required for performing field surveys. In this context, remote sensing is a powerful tool, continuously providing consistent and open access data at a different range of spatial and temporal scales. In particular, the Sentinel-2 (S2) mission has great potential to produce reliable proxies for biological diversity. In beech forests of two Italian National Parks, we sampled the beetle fauna, breeding birds, and epiphytic lichens. First, we calculated Shannon’s entropy and Simpson’s diversity. Then, to produce variables for biodiversity assessment, we exploited S2 data acquired in the 4 years 2017–2021. S2 images were used to construct spectral bands and photosynthetic indices time series, from which 91 harmonic metrics were derived. For each taxon and multi-taxon community, we assessed the correlation with S2 harmonic metrics, biodiversity indices, and forest structural variables. Then, to assess the potential of the harmonic metrics in predicting species diversity in terms of Shannon’s and Simpson’s biodiversity indices, we also fit a random forests model between each diversity index and the best 10 harmonic metrics (in terms of absolute correlation, that is, the magnitude of the correlation) for each taxon. The models’ performance was evaluated via the relative root mean squared error (RMSE%). Overall, 241 beetle, 27 bird, and 59 lichen species were recorded. The diversity indices were higher for the multi-taxon community than for the single taxa. They were generally higher in the CVDA site than in GSML, except for the bird community. The highest correlation values between S2 data and biodiversity indices were recorded in CVDA for multi-taxon and beetle communities (| r| = 0.52 and 0.38, respectively), and in GSML for lichen and beetle communities (| r| = 0.34 and 0.26, respectively). RMSE% ranged between 2.53 and 9.99, and between 8.1 and 16.8 for the Simpson and Shannon index, respectively. The most important variables are phase and RMSE of red-Edge bands for bird and lichen communities, while RMSE and time of tassel cap and from EVI indices for beetles and multi-taxon diversity. Our results demonstrate that S2 data can be used for identifying potential biodiversity hotspots, showing that the herein presented harmonic metrics are informative for several taxa inhabiting wood, giving concrete support to cost-effective biodiversity monitoring and nature-based forest management in complex mountain systems.

[1]  C. Kuenzer,et al.  Forest Biodiversity Monitoring Based on Remotely Sensed Spectral Diversity - A Review , 2022, Remote. Sens..

[2]  G. Chirici,et al.  An open and georeferenced dataset of forest structural attributes and microhabitats in central and southern Apennines (Italy) , 2022, Data in brief.

[3]  R. Tognetti,et al.  Monitoring the abundance of saproxylic red-listed species in a managed beech forest by landsat temporal metrics , 2022, Forest Ecosystems.

[4]  Nicholas C. Coops,et al.  An open science and open data approach for the statistically robust estimation of forest disturbance areas , 2022, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[5]  L. Gustafsson,et al.  Closer-to-Nature Forest Management , 2022 .

[6]  R. Dubayah,et al.  Comparing frameworks for biomass prediction for the Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation , 2022, Remote Sensing of Environment.

[7]  Climate-Smart Forestry in Mountain Regions , 2022, Managing Forest Ecosystems.

[8]  F. Xystrakis,et al.  Handbook of field sampling for multi-taxon biodiversity studies in European forests , 2021, Ecological Indicators.

[9]  A. Campanaro,et al.  Open datasets wanted for tracking the insect decline: let’s start from saproxylic beetles , 2021, Biodiversity data journal.

[10]  Nadejda A. Soudzilovskaia,et al.  Explaining discrepancies between spectral and in-situ plant diversity in multispectral satellite earth observation , 2021, Remote Sensing of Environment.

[11]  P. Corona,et al.  A deep learning approach for automatic mapping of poplar plantations using Sentinel-2 imagery , 2021, GIScience & Remote Sensing.

[12]  A. Barbati,et al.  Mapping forest condition in Europe: Methodological developments in support to forest biodiversity assessments , 2021 .

[13]  Henrik Persson,et al.  Assessing Forest Type and Tree Species Classification Using Sentinel-1 C-Band SAR Data in Southern Sweden , 2021, Remote. Sens..

[14]  R. Tognetti,et al.  Forest stand structure and coarse woody debris determine the biodiversity of beetle communities in Mediterranean mountain beech forests , 2021 .

[15]  R. McRoberts,et al.  The Three Indices Three Dimensions (3I3D) algorithm: a new method for forest disturbance mapping and area estimation based on optical remotely sensed imagery , 2021 .

[16]  R. Filigheddu,et al.  Exploring the biodiversity of key groups in coppice forests (Central Italy): the relationship among vascular plants, epiphytic lichens, and wood-decaying fungi , 2021, Plant Biosystems - An International Journal Dealing with all Aspects of Plant Biology.

[17]  K. Lapin,et al.  Linking forest management and biodiversity indicators to strengthen sustainable forest management in Europe , 2021, Ecological Indicators.

[18]  N. Mansuy,et al.  Predictive mapping of bryophyte richness patterns in boreal forests using species distribution models and remote sensing data , 2020 .

[19]  N. Stork,et al.  The living dead: acknowledging life after tree death to stop forest degradation , 2020, Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment.

[20]  A. Klein,et al.  Insect abundance in managed forests benefits from multi-layered vegetation , 2020 .

[21]  E. Lindberg,et al.  What is good for birds is not always good for lichens: Interactions between forest structure and species richness in managed boreal forests , 2020 .

[22]  S. Puliti,et al.  Assessment of UAV photogrammetric DTM-independent variables for modelling and mapping forest structural indices in mixed temperate forests , 2020 .

[23]  Premysl Stych,et al.  Sentinel-2 Data in an Evaluation of the Impact of the Disturbances on Forest Vegetation , 2020, Remote. Sens..

[24]  L. Tang,et al.  A commentary review on the use of normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) in the era of popular remote sensing , 2020, Journal of Forestry Research.

[25]  V. Radeloff,et al.  Habitat heterogeneity captured by 30-m resolution satellite image texture predicts bird richness across the USA. , 2020, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[26]  Karine Reis Ferreira,et al.  An Overview of Platforms for Big Earth Observation Data Management and Analysis , 2020, Remote. Sens..

[27]  J. Bauhus,et al.  What do tree-related microhabitats tell us about the abundance of forest-dwelling bats, birds, and insects? , 2020, Journal of environmental management.

[28]  L. Jost,et al.  Diversity Measures , 2019, Encyclopedia of Theoretical Ecology.

[29]  Sebastian Böck,et al.  Optimal Input Features for Tree Species Classification in Central Europe Based on Multi-Temporal Sentinel-2 Data , 2019, Remote. Sens..

[30]  Marco Heurich,et al.  Radar vision in the mapping of forest biodiversity from space , 2019, Nature Communications.

[31]  J. Gamon,et al.  Remote sensing of terrestrial plant biodiversity , 2019, Remote Sensing of Environment.

[32]  G. Matteucci,et al.  Identifying priority sites for insect conservation in forest ecosystems at high resolution: the potential of LiDAR data , 2019, Journal of Insect Conservation.

[33]  Marc Zebisch,et al.  Estimating tree species diversity from space in an alpine conifer forest: The Rao's Q diversity index meets the spectral variation hypothesis , 2019, Ecol. Informatics.

[34]  R. Tognetti,et al.  Relationships between stand structural attributes and saproxylic beetle abundance in a Mediterranean broadleaved mixed forest , 2019, Forest Ecology and Management.

[35]  Y. Paillet,et al.  Congruence across taxa and spatial scales: Are we asking too much of species data? , 2018, Global Ecology and Biogeography.

[36]  Christopher B Anderson,et al.  Biodiversity monitoring, earth observations and the ecology of scale. , 2018, Ecology letters.

[37]  R. Tognetti,et al.  Linking deadwood traits with saproxylic invertebrates and fungi in European forests - a review , 2018, iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry.

[38]  Marco Heurich,et al.  LiDAR‐derived canopy structure supports the more‐individuals hypothesis for arthropod diversity in temperate forests , 2018 .

[39]  Mark A. Friedl,et al.  A Method for Robust Estimation of Vegetation Seasonality from Landsat and Sentinel-2 Time Series Data , 2018, Remote. Sens..

[40]  N. Coops,et al.  Using airborne laser scanning to predict plant species richness and assess conservation threats in the oil sands region of Alberta’s boreal forest , 2018 .

[41]  M. Herold,et al.  Improving near-real time deforestation monitoring in tropical dry forests by combining dense Sentinel-1 time series with Landsat and ALOS-2 PALSAR-2 , 2018 .

[42]  Michael Dixon,et al.  Google Earth Engine: Planetary-scale geospatial analysis for everyone , 2017 .

[43]  R. Brandl,et al.  Remote sensing improves prediction of tropical montane species diversity but performance differs among taxa , 2017 .

[44]  H. Yılmaz,et al.  Can tree species diversity be assessed with Landsat data in a temperate forest? , 2017, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment.

[45]  Robert H. Shumway,et al.  Time series analysis and its applications : with R examples , 2017 .

[46]  Gherardo Chirici,et al.  Statistical inference for forest structural diversity indices using airborne laser scanning data and the k-Nearest Neighbors technique , 2016 .

[47]  A. Chao,et al.  iNEXT: an R package for rarefaction and extrapolation of species diversity (Hill numbers) , 2016 .

[48]  Anna F. Cord,et al.  Linking earth observation and taxonomic, structural and functional biodiversity: local to ecosystem perspectives , 2016 .

[49]  A. Barbati,et al.  One taxon does not fit all: Herb-layer diversity and stand structural complexity are weak predictors of biodiversity in Fagus sylvatica forests , 2016 .

[50]  Susan L. Ustin,et al.  Preface: Remote Sensing of Biodiversity , 2016, Remote. Sens..

[51]  C. Rondinini,et al.  A Red List of Italian Saproxylic Beetles: taxonomic overview, ecological features and conservation issues (Coleoptera) , 2015 .

[52]  P. Brichetti,et al.  Check-list of Italian Birds, updated to the end of 2014 , 2015 .

[53]  R. McRoberts,et al.  Estimating and mapping forest structural diversity using airborne laser scanning data , 2015 .

[54]  G. Matteucci,et al.  A guild-based approach to assessing the influence of beech forest structure on bird communities , 2015 .

[55]  A. Sverdrup‐Thygeson,et al.  Scale-specific responses of saproxylic beetles: combining dead wood surveys with data from satellite imagery , 2015, Journal of Insect Conservation.

[56]  E. Næsset,et al.  Optimizing the k-Nearest Neighbors technique for estimating forest aboveground biomass using airborne laser scanning data , 2015 .

[57]  R. Gerstmeier,et al.  Fauna Europaea: Coleoptera 2 (excl. series Elateriformia, Scarabaeiformia, Staphyliniformia and superfamily Curculionoidea) , 2015, Biodiversity data journal.

[58]  Therese Johansson,et al.  Can Airborne Laser Scanning (ALS) and Forest Estimates Derived from Satellite Images Be Used to Predict Abundance and Species Richness of Birds and Beetles in Boreal Forest? , 2015, Remote. Sens..

[59]  Ermias T. Azeria,et al.  The strength of cross‐taxon congruence in species composition varies with the size of regional species pools and the intensity of human disturbance , 2015 .

[60]  Joanne C. White,et al.  An integrated Landsat time series protocol for change detection and generation of annual gap-free surface reflectance composites , 2015 .

[61]  P. Brichetti,et al.  Check-list degli uccelli italiani aggiornata al 2014 , 2015 .

[62]  P. W. Lane,et al.  Global meta-analysis reveals low consistency of biodiversity congruence relationships , 2014, Nature Communications.

[63]  Joanne C. White,et al.  Pixel-Based Image Compositing for Large-Area Dense Time Series Applications and Science , 2014 .

[64]  H. Tuomisto,et al.  Ground Layer Plant Species Turnover and Beta Diversity in Southern-European Old-Growth Forests , 2014, PloS one.

[65]  C. Bouget,et al.  Key features for saproxylic beetle diversity derived from rapid habitat assessment in temperate forests , 2014 .

[66]  J. Nascimbene,et al.  Evaluating the conservation status of epiphytic lichens of Italy: A red list , 2013 .

[67]  C. Justice,et al.  High-Resolution Global Maps of 21st-Century Forest Cover Change , 2013, Science.

[68]  Stefano Martellos,et al.  From a textual checklist to an information system: The case study of ITALIC, the Information System on Italian Lichens , 2012 .

[69]  Eduardo Zorita,et al.  Reconstructing the Development of Baltic Sea Eutrophication 1850–2006 , 2012, AMBIO.

[70]  Gherardo Chirici,et al.  National Forest Inventory contributions to forest biodiversity monitoring , 2012 .

[71]  G. Ståhl,et al.  Assessing Deadwood Using Harmonized National Forest Inventory Data , 2012 .

[72]  I. Király,et al.  Factors influencing epiphytic bryophyte and lichen species richness at different spatial scales in managed temperate forests , 2012, Biodiversity and Conservation.

[73]  J. Feehan,et al.  Evaluating and interpreting cross-taxon congruence: Potential pitfalls and solutions , 2011 .

[74]  Yves Bousquet,et al.  Family-group names in Coleoptera (Insecta) , 2011, ZooKeys.

[75]  Zhiqiang Yang,et al.  Detecting trends in forest disturbance and recovery using yearly Landsat time series: 1. LandTrendr — Temporal segmentation algorithms , 2010 .

[76]  David B. Lindenmayer,et al.  The science and application of ecological monitoring , 2010 .

[77]  J. Lamarque,et al.  Global Biodiversity: Indicators of Recent Declines , 2010, Science.

[78]  G. Aragón,et al.  Effects of forest management on epiphytic lichen diversity in Mediterranean forests , 2010 .

[79]  G. Brunialti,et al.  Multi‐taxon and forest structure sampling for identification of indicators and monitoring of old‐growth forest , 2010 .

[80]  J. Nascimbene,et al.  Testing Lobaria pulmonaria (L.) Hoffm. as an indicator of lichen conservation importance of Italian forests , 2010 .

[81]  Y. Paillet,et al.  Biodiversity Differences between Managed and Unmanaged Forests: Meta‐Analysis of Species Richness in Europe , 2010, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[82]  M. Marchetti,et al.  LICHEN DIVERSITY OF OLD-GROWTH FORESTS IN MOLISE (CENTRAL-SOUTHERN ITALY) , 2010 .

[83]  E. Tomppo National Forest Inventories : pathways for common reporting , 2010 .

[84]  Roland Brandl,et al.  Assessing biodiversity by remote sensing in mountainous terrain: the potential of LiDAR to predict forest beetle assemblages , 2009 .

[85]  Timothy D. Aldred,et al.  Biodiversity quality: A paradigm for biodiversity , 2009 .

[86]  Andrew Nelson,et al.  Delivering a Global, Terrestrial, Biodiversity Observation System through Remote Sensing , 2009, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[87]  A. Huete,et al.  Development of a two-band enhanced vegetation index without a blue band , 2008 .

[88]  W. Oechel,et al.  On the use of MODIS EVI to assess gross primary productivity of North American ecosystems , 2006 .

[89]  P. Beck,et al.  Improved monitoring of vegetation dynamics at very high latitudes: A new method using MODIS NDVI , 2006 .

[90]  S. Ravera,et al.  Phytoclimatic characterization of lichen habitats in central Italy , 2006 .

[91]  John R. Miller,et al.  Assessing vineyard condition with hyperspectral indices: Leaf and canopy reflectance simulation in a row-structured discontinuous canopy , 2005 .

[92]  J. Tenhunen,et al.  On the relationship of NDVI with leaf area index in a deciduous forest site , 2005 .

[93]  T. Ricketts,et al.  Confronting a biome crisis: global disparities of habitat loss and protection , 2004 .

[94]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Random Forests , 2001, Machine Learning.

[95]  M. Fladeland,et al.  Remote sensing for biodiversity science and conservation , 2003 .

[96]  Malcolm L. Hunter,et al.  Book Review - Drafting a conservation blueprint. A Practitioner's Guide to Planning for Biodiversity Craig R. Groves. Island Press, Washington, DC, 2003, cloth $70, ISBN 1-55963-938-5; paper $35, ISBN 1-55963-939-3 , 2004, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[97]  W. Denison Apothecia and ascospores of Lobaria oregana and Lobaria pulmonaria investigated , 2003, Mycologia.

[98]  K. Vandekerkhove,et al.  Assessing and Monitoring the Status of Biodiversity-Related Aspects in Flemish Forests by Use of the Flemish Forest Inventory Data , 2003 .

[99]  O. W. Purvis,et al.  MAPPING LICHEN DIVERSITY AS AN INDICATOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY , 2002 .

[100]  H. Nagendra Using remote sensing to assess biodiversity , 2001 .

[101]  B. Frey,et al.  Reintroduction and augmentation of populations of the endangered Lobaria pulmonaria: Methods and concepts , 1998 .

[102]  Y. Gauslaa The Lobarion, an Epiphytic Community of Ancient Forests Threatened by Acid Rain , 1995, The Lichenologist.

[103]  H. Holien The Genus Bryoria Sect. Implexae in Norway , 1989, The Lichenologist.

[104]  F. Rose Phytogeographical and ecological aspects of Lobarion communities in Europe , 1988 .

[105]  Y. Gauslaa The Ecology of Lobarion Pulmonariae and Parmelion Caperatae in Quercus Dominated Forests in South-West Norway , 1985, The Lichenologist.

[106]  J. Townshend,et al.  African Land-Cover Classification Using Satellite Data , 1985, Science.

[107]  J. A. Schell,et al.  Monitoring vegetation systems in the great plains with ERTS , 1973 .

[108]  J. Barkman,et al.  Phytosociology and ecology of cryptogamic epiphytes , 1971 .