Changes in effective connectivity of human superior parietal lobule under multisensory and unisensory stimulation

Previous event‐related potential (ERP) studies have identified the superior parietal lobule (SPL) as actively multisensory. This study compares effective, or contextually active, connections to this region under unisensory and multisensory conditions. Effective connectivity, the influence of one brain region over another, during unisensory visual, unisensory auditory and multisensory audiovisual stimulation was investigated. ERPs were recorded from subdural electrodes placed over the parietal lobe of three patients while they conducted a rapid reaction‐time task. A generative model of interacting neuronal ensembles for ERPs was inverted in a scheme allowing investigation of the connections from and to the SPL, a multisensory processing area. Important features of the ensemble model include inhibitory and excitatory feedback connections to pyramidal cells and extrinsic input to the stellate cell pool, with extrinsic forward and backward connections delineated by laminar connection differences between ensembles. The framework embeds the SPL in a plausible connection of distinct neuronal ensembles mirroring the integrated brain regions involved in the response task. Bayesian model comparison was used to test competing feed‐forward and feed‐backward models of how the electrophysiological data were generated. Comparisons were performed between multisensory and unisensory data. Findings from three patients show differences in summed unisensory and multisensory ERPs that can be accounted for by a mediation of both forward and backward connections to the SPL. In particular, a negative gain in all forward and backward connections to the SPL from other regions was observed during the period of multisensory integration, while a positive gain was observed for forward projections that arise from the SPL.

[1]  John J. Foxe,et al.  The case for feedforward multisensory convergence during early cortical processing , 2005, Neuroreport.

[2]  R. Campbell,et al.  Evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging of crossmodal binding in the human heteromodal cortex , 2000, Current Biology.

[3]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Coding of peripersonal space in inferior premotor cortex (area F4). , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Dynamic causal modelling of evoked responses in EEG/MEG with lead field parameterization , 2006, NeuroImage.

[5]  W. Freeman.  Nonlinear neural dynamics in olfaction as a model for cognition , 1990 .

[6]  John J. Foxe,et al.  Multisensory auditory-visual interactions during early sensory processing in humans: a high-density electrical mapping study. , 2002, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[7]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  A Dynamic Causal Modeling Study on Category Effects: BottomUp or TopDown Mediation? , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[8]  G. Calvert.  Crossmodal processing in the human brain: insights from functional neuroimaging studies. , 2001, Cerebral cortex.

[9]  Mikko Sams,et al.  Perception of matching and conflicting audiovisual speech in dyslexic and fluent readers: An fMRI study at 3 T , 2006, NeuroImage.

[10]  R. L. Reep,et al.  Rat posterior parietal cortex: topography of corticocortical and thalamic connections , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[11]  Fabrice Wendling,et al.  Relevance of nonlinear lumped-parameter models in the analysis of depth-EEG epileptic signals , 2000, Biological Cybernetics.

[12]  W. David Hairston,et al.  Multisensory enhancement of localization under conditions of induced myopia , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[13]  John J. Foxe,et al.  The timing and laminar profile of converging inputs to multisensory areas of the macaque neocortex. , 2002, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[14]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Dynamic causal modelling of evoked responses: The role of intrinsic connections , 2007, NeuroImage.

[15]  Andrew B. Schwartz,et al.  Brain-Controlled Interfaces: Movement Restoration with Neural Prosthetics , 2006, Neuron.

[16]  Ernst Fernando Lopes Da Silva Niedermeyer,et al.  Electroencephalography, basic principles, clinical applications, and related fields , 1982 .

[17]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  A theory of cortical responses , 2005, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[18]  D. J. Felleman,et al.  Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex. , 1991, Cerebral cortex.

[19]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  a K.E. Stephan, a R.B. Reilly, , 2007 .

[20]  Gregory V. Simpson,et al.  Biasing the brain’s attentional set: II. Effects of selective intersensory attentional deployments on subsequent sensory processing , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[21]  A. Raftery.  Bayesian Model Selection in Social Research , 1995 .

[22]  E. Macaluso,et al.  Multisensory spatial interactions: a window onto functional integration in the human brain , 2005, Trends in Neurosciences.

[23]  J. Cowan,et al.  A mathematical theory of the functional dynamics of cortical and thalamic nervous tissue , 1973, Kybernetik.

[24]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Statistical parametric mapping for event-related potentials (II): a hierarchical temporal model , 2004, NeuroImage.

[25]  L. M. Warner,et al.  The Neural Mechanisms for Minimizing Cross-Modal Distraction , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[26]  John J. Foxe,et al.  Multisensory processing and oscillatory activity: analyzing non-linear electrophysiological measures in humans and simians , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[27]  C. Schroeder,et al.  Neuronal Oscillations and Multisensory Interaction in Primary Auditory Cortex , 2007, Neuron.

[28]  C. Rosenberg,et al.  Electroencephalography: Basic Principles, Clinical Applications, and Related Fields, 3rd Ed. , 1994 .

[29]  Rajesh P. N. Rao,et al.  Predictive coding in the visual cortex: a functional interpretation of some extra-classical receptive-field effects. , 1999 .

[30]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation-Induced Changes in Sensorimotor Coupling Parallel Improvements of Somatosensation in Humans , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[31]  M. Murray,et al.  EEG source imaging , 2004, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[32]  C. Frith,et al.  Modulation of human visual cortex by crossmodal spatial attention. , 2000, Science.

[33]  S. Iversen,et al.  Detection of Audio-Visual Integration Sites in Humans by Application of Electrophysiological Criteria to the BOLD Effect , 2001, NeuroImage.

[34]  C. Schroeder,et al.  Somatosensory input to auditory association cortex in the macaque monkey. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[35]  John J. Foxe,et al.  Multisensory auditory-somatosensory interactions in early cortical processing revealed by high-density electrical mapping. , 2000, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[36]  John J. Foxe,et al.  Multisensory visual-auditory object recognition in humans: a high-density electrical mapping study. , 2004, Cerebral cortex.

[37]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Dynamic causal modelling of evoked potentials: A reproducibility study , 2007, NeuroImage.

[38]  Ben H. Jansen,et al.  Electroencephalogram and visual evoked potential generation in a mathematical model of coupled cortical columns , 1995, Biological Cybernetics.

[39]  John J. Foxe,et al.  Multisensory contributions to low-level, ‘unisensory’ processing , 2005, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[40]  Seppo P. Ahlfors,et al.  Biasing the brain’s attentional set: I. Cue driven deployments of intersensory selective attention , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[41]  John J. Foxe,et al.  Auditory-somatosensory multisensory processing in auditory association cortex: an fMRI study. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[42]  M. Giard,et al.  Auditory-Visual Integration during Multimodal Object Recognition in Humans: A Behavioral and Electrophysiological Study , 1999, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[43]  John J. Foxe,et al.  Audio-visual multisensory integration in superior parietal lobule revealed by human intracranial recordings. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[44]  G. V. Simpson,et al.  Cellular generators of the cortical auditory evoked potential initial component. , 1992, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[45]  M. Eimer,et al.  Spatial tuning of tactile attention modulates visual processing within hemifields: an ERP investigation of crossmodal attention , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[46]  G. V. Simpson,et al.  Parieto‐occipital ∼1 0Hz activity reflects anticipatory state of visual attention mechanisms , 1998 .

[47]  Paul B. Johnson,et al.  Premotor and parietal cortex: corticocortical connectivity and combinatorial computations. , 1997, Annual review of neuroscience.

[48]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Comparing dynamic causal models , 2004, NeuroImage.

[49]  John J. Foxe,et al.  Seeing voices: High-density electrical mapping and source-analysis of the multisensory mismatch negativity evoked during the McGurk illusion , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[50]  Ruth Campbell,et al.  Audio–visual speech perception in schizophrenia: an fMRI study , 2001, Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging.

[51]  M. Mesulam,et al.  Shifts of Effective Connectivity within a Language Network during Rhyming and Spelling , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[52]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Involuntary orienting to sound improves visual perception , 2000, Nature.

[53]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Dynamic causal modeling , 2010, Scholarpedia.

[54]  J. Price,et al.  The organization of networks within the orbital and medial prefrontal cortex of rats, monkeys and humans. , 2000, Cerebral cortex.

[55]  D. Pandya,et al.  Parietal, temporal, and occipita projections to cortex of the superior temporal sulcus in the rhesus monkey: A retrograde tracer study , 1994, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[56]  John J. Foxe,et al.  Do you see what I am saying? Exploring visual enhancement of speech comprehension in noisy environments. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[57]  John J. Foxe,et al.  Grabbing your ear: rapid auditory-somatosensory multisensory interactions in low-level sensory cortices are not constrained by stimulus alignment. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[58]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Dynamic causal modelling , 2003, NeuroImage.

[59]  John J. Foxe,et al.  Human–simian correspondence in the early cortical processing of multisensory cues , 2004, Cognitive Processing.

[60]  J. Fermaglich.  Electric Fields of the Brain: The Neurophysics of EEG , 1982 .

[61]  Albert Postma,et al.  Multisensory integration mechanisms in haptic space perception , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[62]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Dynamic causal models of neural system dynamics: current state and future extensions , 2007, Journal of Biosciences.

[63]  Riitta Hari,et al.  Audiovisual Integration of Letters in the Human Brain , 2000, Neuron.

[64]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Dynamic causal modeling of evoked responses in EEG and MEG , 2006, NeuroImage.

[65]  John J. Foxe,et al.  Attention-dependent suppression of distracter visual input can be cross-modally cued as indexed by anticipatory parieto-occipital alpha-band oscillations. , 2001, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[66]  T. Cooper,et al.  Factors affecting the delay of antidepressant effect in responders to Nortriptyline and Phenelzine , 1989, Psychiatry Research.

[67]  Paul J. Laurienti,et al.  On the use of superadditivity as a metric for characterizing multisensory integration in functional neuroimaging studies , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.