Network neutrality is the new common carriage

Purpose – This article considers internet system development with reference to what is currently termed the “network neutrality” debate; its aim is to develop improved ways of reasoning about the role of the public interest in networked communications infrastructures.Design/methodology/approach – To assess the degree to which a general non‐discrimination rule would be possible or useful, this article this article reviews documented examples of differential service by internet service providers that already occur. It then compares these practices to older debates about common carriage.Findings – Most of the debate about network neutrality focuses on a few kinds of content discrimination, while there are many more varieties at work. While the focus of the debate has been legal, the problem is often technological. Many kinds of discrimination are now at work, often secretly.Practical implications – Rather than one grand, neutral rule for a neutral internet, there is a need for a normative framework that can ...

[1]  Jared S. Dinkes.  Rethinking the Revolution: Competitive Telephony in a Voice over Internet Protocol Era , 2005 .

[2]  Christopher S. Yoo,et al.  Would Mandating Broadband Network Neutrality Help or Hurt Competition? A Comment on the End-to-End Debate , 2004, J. Telecommun. High Technol. Law.

[3]  Doug Schuler,et al.  New community networks - wired for change , 1996 .

[4]  Michael Borrus,et al.  Islands in the Bit-Stream: Charting the NII Interoperability Debate , 1995 .

[5]  Christian Sandvig.  An initial assessment of cooperative action in Wi-Fi networking , 2004 .

[6]  E. Noam.  Beyond liberalization II: The impending doom of common carriage☆ , 1994 .

[7]  Philip J. Weiser,et al.  Modularity, Vertical Integration, and Open Access Policies: Towards a Convergence of Antitrust and Regulation in the Internet Age , 2003 .

[8]  K. T. Wu,et al.  Average error probability for quadriphase modulated DS-SSMA communications through Nakagami fading channel , 1993, Telecommun. Syst..

[9]  Ithiel de Sola Pool,et al.  Technologies of Freedom , 1983 .

[10]  Stephen S. Cohen,et al.  Access and innovation policy for the third-generation internet , 2000 .

[11]  Christopher E. Fulmer.  When Discrimination Is Good: Encouraging Broadband Internet Investment Without Content Neutrality , 2006 .

[12]  C. Hunter.  Social Impacts , 2000 .

[13]  Lorrie Faith Cranor,et al.  Advantage ISP: Terms of Service as Media Law , 2003 .

[14]  Lee W. McKnight,et al.  The Gordian knot: political gridlock on the information highway , 1997 .

[15]  Tim Wu,et al.  Network Neutrality, Broadband Discrimination , 2003, J. Telecommun. High Technol. Law.

[16]  Tibor Beke.  Fending Off Automated Mass Electronic Mail: or, How to Distinguish Yourself from a Computer , 1998, First Monday.

[17]  Robin Mason,et al.  The Economics of the Internet: Infrastructure and Regulation , 2001 .

[18]  S. Aronowitz.  Brand X Internet Services v. FCC: The Case of the Missing Policy Argument , 2005 .