Quantity and Quality Changes in Sugar Beet (Beta vulgaris Provar. Altissima Doel) Induced by Different Sources of Biostimulants
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] J. Bocianowski,et al. Genotype by environment interaction for physiological traits in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) parents and hybrids using additive main effects and multiplicative interaction model , 2021, European Food Research and Technology.
[2] Dariusz Gozdowski,et al. Influence of Various Forms of Foliar Application on Root Yield and Technological Quality of Sugar Beet , 2021, Agriculture.
[3] S. Srivastava,et al. Sugar Beet Cultivation in India: Prospects for Bio-Ethanol Production and Value-Added Co-Products , 2021, Sugar Tech.
[4] V. Pačuta,et al. Grain Yield and Quality Traits of Durum Wheat (Triticum durum Desf.) Treated with Seaweed- and Humic Acid-Based Biostimulants , 2021, Agronomy.
[5] V. Pačuta,et al. Impact of Superabsorbent Polymers and Variety on Yield, Quality and Physiological Parameters of the Sugar Beet (Beta vulgaris prov. Altissima Doell) , 2021, Plants.
[6] P. Stevanato,et al. Effect of Microalgal Extracts from Chlorella vulgaris and Scenedesmus quadricauda on Germination of Beta vulgaris Seeds , 2020, Plants.
[7] Y. Chendev,et al. Sugar Beet Harvests under Modern Climatic Conditions in the Belgorod Region (Southwest Russia) , 2020, Climate.
[8] W. Wadas,et al. Changes in Assimilation Area and Chlorophyll Content of Very Early Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) Cultivars as Influenced by Biostimulants , 2020, Agronomy.
[9] C. Hoffmann,et al. Tissue composition and arrangement in sugar beet genotypes of different tissue strength with regard to damage and pathogen infestation , 2020 .
[10] M. Mori,et al. Plant-Based Biostimulants Influence the Agronomical, Physiological, and Qualitative Responses of Baby Rocket Leaves under Diverse Nitrogen Conditions , 2019, Plants.
[11] T. Lenartowicz,et al. Assessment of Stability and Adaptation Patterns of White Sugar Yield from Sugar Beet Cultivars in Temperate Climate Environments , 2019, Agronomy.
[12] M. Frąc,et al. Plant Biostimulants: Importance of the Quality and Yield of Horticultural Crops and the Improvement of Plant Tolerance to Abiotic Stress—A Review , 2019, Agronomy.
[13] R. Bulgari,et al. Biostimulants Application in Horticultural Crops under Abiotic Stress Conditions , 2019, Agronomy.
[14] A. Squartini,et al. Molecular and Morphological Changes Induced by Leonardite-based Biostimulant in Beta vulgaris L. , 2019, Plants.
[15] Dario Papale,et al. A comparison of different methods for assessing leaf area index in four canopy types , 2019, Central European Forestry Journal.
[16] S. Vicente‐Serrano,et al. The impact of drought on the productivity of two rainfed crops in Spain , 2019, Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences.
[17] M. Iqbal,et al. Physicochemical Characteristics and Yield of Sugar Beet (Beta vulgaris L.) Cv. “California-Kws” Influenced with Irrigation Intervals , 2019, Sarhad Journal of Agriculture.
[18] C. Kaya,et al. Physiological Effects of the Brown Seaweed (Ascophyllum nodosum) and Humic Substances on Plant Growth, Enzyme Activities of Certain Pepper Plants Grown under Salt Stress , 2018, Acta biologica Hungarica.
[19] M. Ćirić,et al. Effect of Sugar Beet Genotype, Planting and Harvesting Dates and Their Interaction on Sugar Yield , 2018, Front. Plant Sci..
[20] P. Barłóg,et al. Sugar beet response to different K, Na and Mg ratios in applied fertilizers , 2018 .
[21] A. Wenda-Piesik,et al. Response of sugar beet to humic substances and foliar fertilization with potassium , 2018 .
[22] V. Kožnarová,et al. Recommendation of World Meteorological Organization to describing meteorological or climatological conditions - Information , 2018 .
[23] D. Chołuj,et al. Growth and dry matter partitioning in sugar beet plants (Beta vulgaris L.) under moderate drought , 2018 .
[24] H. Chérif,et al. Alleviation of Salt Stress in Durum Wheat (Triticum durum L.) Seedlings Through the Application of Liquid Seaweed Extracts of Fucus spiralis , 2017 .
[25] Jianchu Xu,et al. Using leaf area index (LAI) to assess vegetation response to drought in Yunnan province of China , 2017, Journal of Mountain Science.
[26] O. Christen,et al. Crop rotation effects on yield, technological quality and yield stability of sugar beet after 45 trial years , 2017 .
[27] V. Pačuta,et al. Influence of selected agrotechnical measures and climate conditions on root yield and digestion of sugar beet , 2016 .
[28] E. Rój,et al. Evaluation of Supercritical Extracts of Algae as Biostimulants of Plant Growth in Field Trials , 2016, Front. Plant Sci..
[29] I. Lorite,et al. Yield response of sunflower to irrigation and fertilization under semi-arid conditions , 2016 .
[30] Guo-Qiang Wu,et al. Effect of osmotic stress on growth and osmolytes accumulation in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) plants , 2016 .
[31] C. Kabała,et al. Conversion of soil pH 1:2.5 KCl and 1:2.5 H2O to 1:5 H2O: conclusions for soil management, environmental monitoring, and international soil databases , 2016 .
[32] M. Schiavon,et al. Plant biostimulants: physiological responses induced by protein hydrolyzed-based products and humic substances in plant metabolism , 2016 .
[33] Marina Fruehauf,et al. Encyclopedia Of Research Design , 2016 .
[34] P. Jardin. Plant biostimulants: Definition, concept, main categories and regulation , 2015 .
[35] Davey L. Jones,et al. Humic and fulvic acids as biostimulants in horticulture , 2015 .
[36] R. Bulgari,et al. Biostimulants and crop responses: a review , 2015 .
[37] J. McGrath,et al. Sugar Beet, Energy Beet, and Industrial Beet , 2015 .
[38] H. Gawrońska,et al. Biological mode of action of a nitrophenolates-based biostimulant: case study , 2014, Front. Plant Sci..
[39] Y. Rouphael,et al. Biostimulant action of a plant-derived protein hydrolysate produced through enzymatic hydrolysis , 2014, Front. Plant Sci..
[40] C. Magorokosho,et al. Genotype × Environment Interaction of Maize Grain Yield Using AMMI Biplots , 2014 .
[41] H. Sharma,et al. Plant biostimulants: a review on the processing of macroalgae and use of extracts for crop management to reduce abiotic and biotic stresses , 2013, Journal of Applied Phycology.
[42] V. Dehbashi. Sugar beet , 2013 .
[43] J. Craigie,et al. Seaweed extract stimuli in plant science and agriculture , 2011, Journal of Applied Phycology.
[44] C. Hoffmann. Sucrose Accumulation in Sugar Beet Under Drought Stress , 2010 .
[45] L. Zorić,et al. Histological characteristics of sugar beet leaves potentially linked to drought tolerance. , 2009 .
[46] C. Hoffmann,et al. Impact of different environments in Europe on yield and quality of sugar beet genotypes , 2009 .
[47] R. Morillo-Velarde,et al. Proline content of sugar beet storage roots: Response to water deficit and nitrogen fertilization at field conditions , 2007 .
[48] G. Kauffman,et al. Effects of a Biostimulant on the Heat Tolerance Associated with Photosynthetic Capacity, Membrane Thermostability, and Polyphenol Production of Perennial Ryegrass , 2007 .
[49] O. K. Chung,et al. Protein accumulation and composition in wheat grains: Effects of mineral nutrients and high temperature , 2006 .
[50] J. Pidgeon,et al. Using multi-environment sugar beet variety trials to screen for drought tolerance , 2006 .
[51] C. Hoffmann,et al. Solute Accumulation as a Cause for Quality Losses in Sugar Beet Submitted to Continuous and Temporary Drought Stress , 2006 .
[52] B. Märländer,et al. Effects of weather variables on sugar beet yield development (Beta vulgaris L.) , 2006 .
[53] J. Pidgeon,et al. Evaluation of physiological traits as indirect selection criteria for drought tolerance in sugar beet , 2005 .
[54] N. Breda. Ground-based measurements of leaf area index: a review of methods, instruments and current controversies. , 2003, Journal of experimental botany.
[55] J. Norman,et al. Instrument for Indirect Measurement of Canopy Architecture , 1991 .
[56] A. Mehlich. Mehlich 3 soil test extractant: A modification of Mehlich 2 extractant , 1984 .
[57] M. Kononova. Humus of Virgin and Cultivated Soils , 1975 .
[58] H. Belshaw,et al. The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations , 1947, International Organization.
[59] T. Mcmeekin,et al. A NEW DIRECT NESSLERIZATION MICRO-KJELDAHL METHOD AND A MODIFICATION OF THE NESSLER-FOLIN REAGENT FOR AMMONIA , 1924 .