Recovery Guarantees for Time-varying Pairwise Comparison Matrices with Non-transitivity

Pairwise comparison matrices have received substantial attention in a variety of applications, especially in rank aggregation, the task of flattening items into a one-dimensional (and thus transitive) ranking. However, non-transitive preference cycles can arise in practice due to the fact that making a decision often requires a complex evaluation of multiple factors. In some applications, it may be important to identify and preserve information about the inherent non-transitivity, either in the pairwise comparison data itself or in the latent feature space. In this work, we develop structured models for non-transitive pairwise comparison matrices that can be exploited to recover such matrices from incomplete noisy data and thus allow the detection of non-transitivity. Considering that individuals’ tastes and items’ latent features may change over time, we formulate time-varying pairwise comparison matrix recovery as a dynamic skew-symmetric matrix recovery problem by modeling changes in the low-rank factors of the pairwise comparison matrix. We provide theoretical guarantees for the recovery and numerically test the proposed theory with both synthetic and real-world data.

[1]  Yuan Yao,et al.  Statistical ranking and combinatorial Hodge theory , 2008, Math. Program..

[2]  P.-C.-F. Daunou,et al.  Mémoire sur les élections au scrutin , 1803 .

[3]  Joel A. Tropp,et al.  An Introduction to Matrix Concentration Inequalities , 2015, Found. Trends Mach. Learn..

[4]  Prateek Jain,et al.  Low-rank matrix completion using alternating minimization , 2012, STOC '13.

[5]  H. A. David Ranking from unbalanced paired-comparison data , 1987 .

[6]  P. Moran On the method of paired comparisons. , 1947, Biometrika.

[7]  Ming Ma A Matrix Approach to Asset Pricing in Foreign Exchange Market , 2006 .

[8]  Luis G. Vargas,et al.  Inconsistency and rank preservation , 1984 .

[9]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Time dependent decision-making; dynamic priorities in the AHP/ANP: Generalizing from points to functions and from real to complex variables , 2007, Math. Comput. Model..

[10]  S. Shapiro,et al.  Mathematics without Numbers , 1993 .

[11]  Mark E. Glickman Paired Comparison Models with Time-Varying Parameters , 1993 .

[12]  Alexandre d'Aspremont,et al.  Ranking and synchronization from pairwise measurements via SVD , 2019, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[13]  Martin J. Wainwright,et al.  Simple, Robust and Optimal Ranking from Pairwise Comparisons , 2015, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[14]  Zhaoran Wang,et al.  A Nonconvex Optimization Framework for Low Rank Matrix Estimation , 2015, NIPS.

[15]  Thorsten Joachims,et al.  Modeling Intransitivity in Matchup and Comparison Data , 2016, WSDM.

[16]  Mark A. Davenport,et al.  Dynamic matrix recovery from incomplete observations under an exact low-rank constraint , 2016, NIPS.

[17]  Ji Chen,et al.  Nonconvex Matrix Completion with Linearly Parameterized Factors , 2020, ArXiv.

[18]  Yoram Singer,et al.  An Efficient Boosting Algorithm for Combining Preferences by , 2013 .

[19]  Emmanuel J. Candès,et al.  Exact Matrix Completion via Convex Optimization , 2008, Found. Comput. Math..

[20]  Matthias Grossglauser,et al.  Pairwise Comparisons with Flexible Time-Dynamics , 2019, KDD.

[21]  Dorit S. Hochbaum,et al.  The separation, and separation-deviation methodology for group decision making and aggregate Ranking , 2010 .

[22]  Moritz Hardt,et al.  Understanding Alternating Minimization for Matrix Completion , 2013, 2014 IEEE 55th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science.

[23]  Anne E Carpenter,et al.  CellProfiler: image analysis software for identifying and quantifying cell phenotypes , 2006, Genome Biology.

[24]  David F. Gleich,et al.  Rank aggregation via nuclear norm minimization , 2011, KDD.

[25]  Rahul M. Makhijani Social Choice Random Utility Models of Intransitive Pairwise Comparisons , 2018, ArXiv.

[26]  Dehui Yang,et al.  Modeling and recovering non-transitive pairwise comparison matrices , 2015, 2015 International Conference on Sampling Theory and Applications (SampTA).