Optimization of Subarray Partition for Large Planar Phased Array Radar Based on Weighted K-Means Clustering Method

Subarray partition is indispensable in large phased array radar system for reducing the manufacturing cost as well as realizing the system potentiality. The optimization of subarray partition for large planar phased array radar according to weighted K-means clustering method is mainly investigated in this paper. Based on the excitation matching technique, the optimization of subarray partition in monopulse application can be reformulated as a clustering of reference gain ratios to minimize the excitation matching error. However, when the element weights are non-uniform for specific intentions such as low sidelobes, the matching error could not be minimized completely by traditional K-means clustering. Therefore, in this paper, a weighted K-means clustering method is proposed to reduce the matching error by modifying the membership rule and cluster center of K-means clustering. The proposed method can provide smaller matching error compared with conventional clustering methods, especially when the elements are weighted non-uniformly. The effectiveness of proposed method is validated by numerical simulations and compared with several classical clustering methods.

[1]  Francisco J. Ares-Pena,et al.  Synthesising Taylor and Bayliss linear distributions with common aperture tail , 2009 .

[2]  A. Massa,et al.  Optimization of the difference patterns for monopulse antennas by a hybrid real/integer-coded differential evolution method , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.

[3]  U. Nickel,et al.  Subarray configurations for digital beamforming with low sidelobes and adaptive interference suppression , 1995, Proceedings International Radar Conference.

[4]  T. Taylor,et al.  Design of circular apertures for narrow beamwidth and low sidelobes , 1960 .

[5]  P. Rocca,et al.  An Improved Excitation Matching Method Based on an Ant Colony Optimization for Suboptimal-Free Clustering in Sum-Difference Compromise Synthesis , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.

[6]  T. Isernia,et al.  An Effective Hybrid Approach for the Optimal Synthesis of Monopulse Antennas , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.

[7]  E. Bayliss Design of monopulse antenna difference patterns with low sidelobes , 1968 .

[8]  Liang Zhang,et al.  Cluster Analysis for the Synthesis of Subarrayed Monopulse Antennas , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.

[9]  Giacomo Oliveri,et al.  Optimal sub-arraying of compromise planar arrays through an innovative ACO-weighted procedure , 2010 .

[10]  Derek A. McNamara,et al.  Synthesis of sub-arrayed monopulse linear arrays through matching of independently optimum sum and difference excitations , 1988 .

[11]  P. Rocca,et al.  Ant colony optimisation for tree-searching-based synthesis of monopulse array antenna , 2008 .

[12]  Derek A. McNamara,et al.  Synthesis of sum and difference patterns for two-section monopulse arrays , 1988 .

[13]  David K. Cheng,et al.  Optimization techniques for antenna arrays , 1971 .

[14]  A. G. Derneryd Optimization of Difference Pattern Sidelobes in the Presence of Fictitious Blockage , 1988 .

[15]  P. Hannan,et al.  A monopulse antenna having independent optimization of the sum and difference modes , 1961 .

[16]  Paolo Rocca,et al.  Synthesis of Sub-Arrayed Monopulse Planar Arrays by Means of an Innovative Excitation Matching Method , 2011 .

[17]  E. Moreno,et al.  Subarray Weighting for the Difference Patterns of Monopulse Antennas: Joint Optimization of Subarray Configurations and Weights , 2001, 2001 31st European Microwave Conference.

[18]  P. Rocca,et al.  A Fast Graph-Searching Algorithm Enabling the Efficient Synthesis of Sub-Arrayed Planar Monopulse Antennas , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.

[19]  P. Rocca,et al.  An Innovative Approach Based on a Tree-Searching Algorithm for the Optimal Matching of Independently Optimum Sum and Difference Excitations , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.

[20]  Tommaso Isernia,et al.  Optimal synthesis of difference patterns subject to arbitrary sidelobe bounds by using arbitrary array antennas , 2005 .

[21]  E. Moreno,et al.  Optimal compromise among sum and difference patterns , 1996 .

[22]  P. Rocca,et al.  Evolutionary strategies for advanced array optimization , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Symposium on Antennas and Propagation (APSURSI).

[23]  E. Moreno,et al.  Subarray weighting for the difference patterns of monopulse antennas: joint optimization of subarray configurations and weights , 2001 .

[24]  P. Hannan,et al.  Optimum feeds for all three modes of a monopulse antenna II: Practice , 1961 .

[25]  F. Ares Pena,et al.  Optimal Compromise Among Sum and Difference Patterns in Monopulse Antennas: Use of Subarrays and Distributions with Common Aperture Tail , 2009 .