Size-dependent leaf area ratio in plant twigs: implication for leaf size optimization.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS Although many hypotheses have been proposed to explain variation in leaf size, the mechanism underlying the variation remains not fully understood. To help understand leaf size variation, the cost/benefit of twig size was analysed, since, according to Corner's rule, twig size is positively correlated with the size of appendages the twig bears. METHODS An extensive survey of twig functional traits, including twig (current-year shoots including one stem and few leaves) and leaf size (individual leaf area and mass), was conducted for 234 species from four broadleaved forests. The scaling relationship between twig mass and leaf area was determined using standardized major axis regression and phylogenetic independent comparative analyses. KEY RESULTS Leaf area was found to scale positively and allometrically with both stem and twig mass (stem mass plus leaf mass) with slopes significantly smaller than 1.0, independent of life form and habitat type. Thus, the leaf area ratio (the ratio of total leaf area to stem or twig mass) decreases with increasing twig size. Moreover, the leaf area ratio correlated negatively with individual leaf mass. The results of phylogenetic independent comparativeanalyses were consistent with the correlations. Based on the above results, a simple model for twig size optimization was constructed, from which it is postulated that large leaf size-twig size may be favoured when leaf photosynthetic capacity is high and/or when leaf life span and/or stem longevity are long. The model's predictions are consistent with leaf size variation among habitats, in which leaf size tends to be small in poor habitats with a low primary productivity. The model also explains large variations in leaf size within habitats for which leaf longevity and stem longevity serve as important determinants. CONCLUSIONS The diminishing returns in the scaling of total leaf area with twig size can be explained in terms of a very simple model on twig siz

[1]  Sean C. Thomas,et al.  The worldwide leaf economics spectrum , 2004, Nature.

[2]  E. Garnier,et al.  Variation in relative growth rate and its components in the annual Polygonum aviculare in relation to habitat disturbance and seed size , 1996, Oecologia.

[3]  F. Valladares,et al.  Do we underestimate the importance of leaf size in plant economics? Disproportional scaling of support costs within the spectrum of leaf physiognomy. , 2007, Annals of botany.

[4]  T. Kira,et al.  A QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS OF PLANT FORM-THE PIPE MODEL THEORY : I.BASIC ANALYSES , 1964 .

[5]  M. Westoby,et al.  Dry mass costs of deploying leaf area in relation to leaf size , 2005 .

[6]  Fernando Valladares,et al.  Convergence in light capture efficiencies among tropical forest understory plants with contrasting crown architectures: a case of morphological compensation. , 2002, American journal of botany.

[7]  P. White.  Corner's Rules in Eastern Deciduous Trees: Allometry and Its Implications for the Adaptive Architecture of Trees , 1983 .

[8]  S. E. Taylor,et al.  Optimal Leaf Form , 1975 .

[9]  Shucun Sun,et al.  The generality of leaf size versus number trade-off in temperate woody species. , 2008, Annals of botany.

[10]  Karl J Niklas,et al.  Global Allocation Rules for Patterns of Biomass Partitioning in Seed Plants , 2002, Science.

[11]  Karl J. Niklas,et al.  Plant Biomechanics: An Engineering Approach to Plant Form and Function , 1993 .

[12]  Thomas J. Givnish,et al.  COMPARATIVE STUDIES OF LEAF FORM: ASSESSING THE RELATIVE ROLES OF SELECTIVE PRESSURES AND PHYLOGENETIC CONSTRAINTS , 2008 .

[13]  Shucun Sun,et al.  Allometric relationships between lamina area, lamina mass and petiole mass of 93 temperate woody species vary with leaf habit, leaf form and altitude , 2008 .

[14]  D. A. King,et al.  Tree architecture in relation to leaf dimensions and tree stature in temperate and tropical rain forests , 1999 .

[15]  Daniel S. Falster,et al.  User's guide to SMATR : standardised major axis tests and routines version 2.0, copyright 2006 , 2006 .

[16]  A. Pitman,et al.  Global patterns in seed size , 2006 .

[17]  M. Tobias,et al.  Leaf size modifies support biomass distribution among stems, petioles and mid-ribs in temperate plants. , 2006, The New phytologist.

[18]  J. A. Wolfe.  PALEOCLIMATIC ESTIMATES FROM TERTIARY LEAF ASSEMBLAGES , 1995 .

[19]  M. Westoby,et al.  Bivariate line‐fitting methods for allometry , 2006, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[20]  Peter B Reich,et al.  The scaling of leaf area and mass: the cost of light interception increases with leaf size , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[21]  Thomas J. Givnish,et al.  Sizes and Shapes of Liane Leaves , 1976, The American Naturalist.

[22]  P. White.  EVIDENCE THAT TEMPERATE EAST NORTH AMERICAN EVERGREEN WOODY PLANTS FOLLOW CORNER'S RULES , 1983 .

[23]  Campbell O. Webb,et al.  Relationships among ecologically important dimensions of plant trait variation in seven neotropical forests. , 2007, Annals of botany.

[24]  N. Weber,et al.  Common Slope Tests for Bivariate Errors‐in‐Variables Models , 2002 .

[25]  H. Takeda,et al.  Cost and probability of flowering at the shoot level in relation to variability in shoot size within the crown of Vaccinium hirtum (Ericaceae). , 2006, The New phytologist.

[26]  Cindy Q. Tang,et al.  Altitudinal distribution of evergreen broad-leaved trees and their leaf-size pattern on a humid subtropical mountain, Mt. Emei, Sichuan, China , 1999, Plant Ecology.

[27]  Shucun Sun,et al.  Within-twig biomass allocation in subtropical evergreen broad-leaved species along an altitudinal gradient: allometric scaling analysis , 2009, Trees.

[28]  Pamela Hall,et al.  Comparisons of structure among mixed dipterocarp forests of north-western Borneo , 1992 .

[29]  Campbell O. Webb,et al.  Bioinformatics Applications Note Phylocom: Software for the Analysis of Phylogenetic Community Structure and Trait Evolution , 2022 .

[30]  Karl J Niklas,et al.  THE ROLE OF PHYLLOTACTIC PATTERN AS A “DEVELOPMENTAL CONSTRAINT” ON THE INTERCEPTION OF LIGHT BY LEAF SURFACES , 1988, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[31]  M. Westoby,et al.  ECOLOGICAL STRATEGIES : Some Leading Dimensions of Variation Between Species , 2002 .

[32]  P. Reich,et al.  Convergence and correlations among leaf size and function in seed plants: a comparative test using independent contrasts. , 1999, American journal of botany.

[33]  M. Westoby,et al.  C O M M U N I T Y E C O L O G Y , 2022 .

[34]  M. Westoby,et al.  Latitude, seed predation and seed mass , 2003 .

[35]  P. Lauri,et al.  Hydraulic and mechanical stem properties affect leaf-stem allometry in mango cultivars. , 2008, The New phytologist.

[36]  Ian J. Wright,et al.  “Diminishing returns” in the scaling of functional leaf traits across and within species groups , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[37]  P. Shi,et al.  The leaf size-twig size spectrum of temperate woody species along an altitudinal gradient: an invariant allometric scaling relationship. , 2006, Annals of botany.

[38]  Karl J. Niklas.  THE ALLOMETRY OF PLANT REPRODUCTIVE BIOMASS AND STEM DIAMETER , 1993 .

[39]  Hendrik Poorter,et al.  Leaf area ratio and net assimilation rate of 24 wild species differing in relative growth rate , 1990, Oecologia.

[40]  K. Niklas,et al.  Biomass partitioning and leaf N,P - stoichiometry: comparisons between tree and herbaceous current-year shoots. , 2006, Plant, cell & environment.

[41]  K. Niklas,et al.  Canonical rules for plant organ biomass partitioning and annual allocation. , 2002, American journal of botany.

[42]  Ülo Niinemets,et al.  Leaf shape and venation pattern alter the support investments within leaf lamina in temperate species: a neglected source of leaf physiological differentiation? , 2007 .

[43]  D. McKey,et al.  Corner's rules revisited: ontogenetic and interspecific patterns in leaf–stem allometry , 1998 .

[44]  D. Ackerly,et al.  Hydraulic architecture and the evolution of shoot allometry in contrasting climates. , 2003, American journal of botany.

[45]  O. Loucks,et al.  Optimal leaf size in relation to environment , 1972 .

[46]  Shen Ze.  Altitudinal pattern of flora on the eastern slope of Mt. Gongga , 2004 .

[47]  T. Givnish.  Leaf and Canopy Adaptations in Tropical Forests , 1984 .

[48]  Karl J. Niklas,et al.  A mechanical perspective on foliage leaf form and function , 1999 .

[49]  Shucun Sun,et al.  The effects of leaf size, leaf habit, and leaf form on leaf/stem relationships in plant twigs of temperate woody species , 2009 .

[50]  E. Corner.  The Durian Theory or the Origin of the Modern Tree , 1949 .

[51]  D. Ackerly,et al.  Self-shading, Carbon Gain and Leaf Dynamics: a Test of Alternative Optimality Models , 1998 .

[52]  M. Westoby,et al.  Leaf-size divergence along rainfall and soil-nutrient gradients: Is the method of size reduction common among clades? , 2003 .