Accuracy of prediction of genomic breeding values for residual feed intake and carcass and meat quality traits in Bos taurus, Bos indicus, and composite beef cattle.

The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of genomic predictions for 19 traits including feed efficiency, growth, and carcass and meat quality traits in beef cattle. The 10,181 cattle in our study had real or imputed genotypes for 729,068 SNP although not all cattle were measured for all traits. Animals included Bos taurus, Brahman, composite, and crossbred animals. Genomic EBV (GEBV) were calculated using 2 methods of genomic prediction [BayesR and genomic BLUP (GBLUP)] either using a common training dataset for all breeds or using a training dataset comprising only animals of the same breed. Accuracies of GEBV were assessed using 5-fold cross-validation. The accuracy of genomic prediction varied by trait and by method. Traits with a large number of recorded and genotyped animals and with high heritability gave the greatest accuracy of GEBV. Using GBLUP, the average accuracy was 0.27 across traits and breeds, but the accuracies between breeds and between traits varied widely. When the training population was restricted to animals from the same breed as the validation population, GBLUP accuracies declined by an average of 0.04. The greatest decline in accuracy was found for the 4 composite breeds. The BayesR accuracies were greater by an average of 0.03 than GBLUP accuracies, particularly for traits with known genes of moderate to large effect mutations segregating. The accuracies of 0.43 to 0.48 for IGF-I traits were among the greatest in the study. Although accuracies are low compared with those observed in dairy cattle, genomic selection would still be beneficial for traits that are hard to improve by conventional selection, such as tenderness and residual feed intake. BayesR identified many of the same quantitative trait loci as a genomewide association study but appeared to map them more precisely. All traits appear to be highly polygenic with thousands of SNP independently associated with each trait.

[1]  Robin Thompson,et al.  ASREML user guide release 1.0 , 2002 .

[2]  M. Goddard,et al.  Genome-wide association studies for feedlot and growth traits in cattle. , 2011, Journal of animal science.

[3]  M. Goddard,et al.  Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. , 2001, Genetics.

[4]  P. VanRaden,et al.  Invited review: reliability of genomic predictions for North American Holstein bulls. , 2009, Journal of dairy science.

[5]  J. Keele,et al.  A new single nucleotide polymorphism in CAPN1 extends the current tenderness marker test to include cattle of Bos indicus, Bos taurus, and crossbred descent. , 2005, Journal of animal science.

[6]  R. Fernando,et al.  Genomic prediction of simulated multibreed and purebred performance using observed fifty thousand single nucleotide polymorphism genotypes. , 2010, Journal of animal science.

[7]  B. Browning,et al.  A fast, powerful method for detecting identity by descent. , 2011, American journal of human genetics.

[8]  D. L. Robinson,et al.  CRC breeding program design, measurements and database: methods that underpin CRC research results , 2001 .

[9]  M. Goddard,et al.  Invited review: Genomic selection in dairy cattle: progress and challenges. , 2009, Journal of dairy science.

[10]  D. Johnston.  Selecting for marbling and its relationship with other important economic traits. What impact does it have , 2001 .

[11]  R. Fernando,et al.  Genomic selection in admixed and crossbred populations. , 2010, Journal of animal science.

[12]  D. Johnston,et al.  Genetics of steer daily and residual feed intake in two tropical beef genotypes, and relationships among intake, body composition, growth and other post-weaning measures , 2009 .

[13]  Rohan L. Fernando,et al.  Extension of the bayesian alphabet for genomic selection , 2011, BMC Bioinformatics.

[14]  M. Goddard.  Genomic selection: prediction of accuracy and maximisation of long term response , 2009, Genetica.

[15]  Johnston,et al.  Genetic and phenotypic characterisation of animal , carcass , and meat quality traits from temperate and tropically adapted beef breeds . 2 . Abattoir carcass traits * , 2003 .

[16]  D. Johnston,et al.  Genetics of meat quality and carcass traits and the impact of tenderstretching in two tropical beef genotypes , 2009 .

[17]  Alison L. Van Eenennaam,et al.  Accuracy of genomic breeding values in multibreed beef cattle populations derived from deregressed breeding values and phenotypes 1 , 2 , 2012 .

[18]  D. Garrick.  The nature, scope and impact of genomic prediction in beef cattle in the United States , 2011, Genetics Selection Evolution.

[19]  D. Johnston,et al.  Estimated gene frequencies of GeneSTAR markers and their size of effects on meat tenderness, marbling, and feed efficiency in temperate and tropical beef cattle breeds across a range of production systems. , 2010, Journal of animal science.

[20]  M. Goddard,et al.  Linkage Disequilibrium and Persistence of Phase in Holstein–Friesian, Jersey and Angus Cattle , 2008, Genetics.

[21]  D. L. Robinson,et al.  Genetic parameters for feed efficiency, fatness, muscle area and feeding behaviour of feedlot finished beef cattle , 2004 .

[22]  D. Johnston,et al.  Effects of early weaning on growth, feed efficiency and carcass traits in Shorthorn cattle , 2010 .

[23]  P. Visscher,et al.  Common SNPs explain a large proportion of heritability for human height , 2011 .

[24]  M Erbe,et al.  Improving accuracy of genomic predictions within and between dairy cattle breeds with imputed high-density single nucleotide polymorphism panels. , 2012, Journal of dairy science.

[25]  W. Barendse,et al.  Epistasis Between Calpain 1 and Its Inhibitor Calpastatin Within Breeds of Cattle , 2007, Genetics.

[26]  G. Melville,et al.  Response to selection for net feed intake in beef cattle. , 2001 .

[27]  B. Hayes,et al.  Accuracy of genomic predictions of residual feed intake and 250-day body weight in growing heifers using 625,000 single nucleotide polymorphism markers. , 2012, Journal of dairy science.

[28]  R. Fernando,et al.  Deregressing estimated breeding values and weighting information for genomic regression analyses , 2009, Genetics Selection Evolution.

[29]  G Fordyce,et al.  Genome-wide association studies of female reproduction in tropically adapted beef cattle. , 2012, Journal of animal science.

[30]  V. H. Oddy,et al.  Genetic and phenotypic characterisation of animal, carcass, and meat quality traits from temperate and tropically adapted beef breeds. 4. Correlations among animal, carcass, and meat quality traits * , 2003 .

[31]  A. Reverter,et al.  Genetic and phenotypic characterisation of animal, carcass, and meat quality traits from temperate and tropically adapted beef breeds. 3. Meat quality traits , 2003 .

[32]  M. P. Heaton,et al.  Evaluation of single-nucleotide polymorphisms in CAPN 1 for association with meat tenderness in cattle 1 , 2 , 2002 .