GENERALIZED EMPIRICAL LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATORS AND TESTS UNDER PARTIAL, WEAK, AND STRONG IDENTIFICATION

The purpose of this paper is to describe the performance of generalized empirical likelihood (GEL) methods for time series instrumental variable models specified by nonlinear moment restrictions as in Stock and Wright (2000, Econometrica 68, 1055–1096) when identification may be weak. The paper makes two main contributions. First, we show that all GEL estimators are first-order equivalent under weak identification. The GEL estimator under weak identification is inconsistent and has a nonstandard asymptotic distribution. Second, the paper proposes new GEL test statistics, which have chi-square asymptotic null distributions independent of the strength or weakness of identification. Consequently, unlike those for Wald and likelihood ratio statistics, the size of tests formed from these statistics is not distorted by the strength or weakness of identification. Modified versions of the statistics are presented for tests of hypotheses on parameter subvectors when the parameters not under test are strongly identified. Monte Carlo results for the linear instrumental variable regression model suggest that tests based on these statistics have very good size properties even in the presence of conditional heteroskedasticity. The tests have competitive power properties, especially for thick-tailed or asymmetric error distributions.This paper is a revision of Guggenberger's job market paper “Generalized Empirical Likelihood Tests under Partial, Weak, and Strong Identification.” We are thankful to the editor, P.C.B. Phillips, and three referees for very helpful suggestions on an earlier version of this paper. Guggenberger gratefully acknowledges the continuous help and support of his adviser, Donald Andrews, who played a prominent role in the formulation of this paper. He thanks Peter Phillips and Joseph Altonji for their extremely valuable comments. We also thank Vadim Marner for help with the simulation section and John Chao, Guido Imbens, Michael Jansson, Frank Kleibergen, Marcelo Moreira, Jonathan Wright, and Motohiro Yogo for helpful comments. Aspects of this research have been presented at the 2003 Econometric Society European Meetings; York Econometrics Workshop 2004; Seminaire Malinvaud; CREST-INSEE; and seminars at Albany, Alicante, Austin (Texas), Brown, Chicago, Chicago GSB, Harvard/MIT, Irvine, ISEG/Universidade Tecnica de Lisboa, Konstanz, Laval, Madison (Wisconsin), Mannheim, Maryland, NYU, Penn, Penn State, Pittsburgh, Princeton, Rice, Riverside, Rochester, San Diego, Texas A&M, UCLA, USC, and Yale. We thank all the seminar participants. Guggenberger and Smith received financial support through a Carl Arvid Anderson Prize Fellowship and a 2002 Leverhulme Major Research Fellowship, respectively.

[1]  Eric Zivot,et al.  Improved Inference in Weakly Identified Instrumental Variables Regression , 2003 .

[2]  G. Imbens,et al.  Information Theoretic Approaches to Inference in Moment Condition Models , 1995 .

[3]  W. Newey,et al.  Hypothesis Testing with Efficient Method of Moments Estimation , 1987 .

[4]  Jean-Marie Dufour,et al.  Some Impossibility Theorems in Econometrics with Applications to Structural and Dynamic Models , 1997 .

[5]  Yuichi Kitamura,et al.  An Information-Theoretic Alternative to Generalized Method of Moments Estimation , 1997 .

[6]  T. W. Anderson,et al.  The Asymptotic Properties of Estimates of the Parameters of a Single Equation in a Complete System of Stochastic Equations , 1950 .

[7]  D. Pollard,et al.  Simulation and the Asymptotics of Optimization Estimators , 1989 .

[8]  Donald W. K. Andrews,et al.  Empirical Process Methods in Econometrics , 1993 .

[9]  Keith A. Baggerly,et al.  Empirical likelihood as a goodness-of-fit measure , 1998 .

[10]  A. Owen.  Empirical likelihood ratio confidence intervals for a single functional , 1988 .

[11]  Jonathan H. Wright,et al.  A Survey of Weak Instruments and Weak Identification in Generalized Method of Moments , 2002 .

[12]  Richard J. Smith.  Alternative Semi-parametric Likelihood Approaches to Generalised Method of Moments Estimation , 1997 .

[13]  Mehmet Caner,et al.  Exponential Tilting with Weak Instruments: Estimation and Testing , 2010 .

[14]  Marcelo J. Moreira.  A Conditional Likelihood Ratio Test for Structural Models , 2003 .

[15]  J. Lawless,et al.  Empirical Likelihood and General Estimating Equations , 1994 .

[16]  Frank Kleibergen,et al.  Pivotal statistics for testing structural parameters in instrumental variables regression , 2002 .

[17]  P. Phillips.  Partially Identified Econometric Models , 1988, Econometric Theory.

[18]  Jon A. Wellner,et al.  Weak Convergence and Empirical Processes: With Applications to Statistics , 1996 .

[19]  Jeffrey M. Wooldridge,et al.  Solutions Manual and Supplementary Materials for Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data , 2003 .

[20]  P. Phillips.  The Exact Distribution of LIML: II , 1984 .

[21]  Richard Startz,et al.  Some Further Results on the Exact Small Sample Properties of the Instrumental Variable Estimator , 1988 .

[22]  W. Newey,et al.  Generalized method of moments specification testing , 1985 .

[23]  L. Hansen.  LARGE SAMPLE PROPERTIES OF GENERALIZED METHOD OF , 1982 .

[24]  Frank Kleibergen,et al.  Testing Parameters in GMM without Assuming that they are identified , 2005 .

[25]  A. Owen.  Empirical Likelihood Ratio Confidence Regions , 1990 .

[26]  Guido W. Imbens,et al.  One-step estimators for over-identified generalized method of moments models , 1997 .

[27]  J. Stock,et al.  Instrumental Variables Regression with Weak Instruments , 1994 .

[28]  Bryan W. Brown,et al.  Efficient Semiparametric Estimation of Expectations , 1998 .

[29]  Yuichi Kitamura,et al.  Empirical likelihood methods with weakly dependent processes , 1997 .

[30]  Whitney K. Newey,et al.  Higher Order Properties of Gmm and Generalized Empirical Likelihood Estimators , 2003 .

[31]  Jonathan H. Wright,et al.  GMM WITH WEAK IDENTIFICATION , 2000 .