Predicting protein complex membership using probabilistic network reliability.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Leslie G. Valiant,et al. The Complexity of Enumeration and Reliability Problems , 1979, SIAM J. Comput..
[2] Michael O. Ball,et al. Computational Complexity of Network Reliability Analysis: An Overview , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Reliability.
[3] Charles J. Colbourn,et al. The Combinatorics of Network Reliability , 1987 .
[4] K. Struhl,et al. NOT1(CDC39), NOT2(CDC36), NOT3, and NOT4 encode a global-negative regulator of transcription that differentially affects TATA-element utilization. , 1994, Genes & development.
[5] R. Kobayashi,et al. Characterization of the five replication factor C genes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 1995, Molecular and cellular biology.
[6] David R. Karger,et al. A randomized fully polynomial time approximation scheme for the all terminal network reliability problem , 1995, STOC '95.
[7] John R Yates,et al. A Subset of TAFIIs Are Integral Components of the SAGA Complex Required for Nucleosome Acetylation and Transcriptional Stimulation , 1998, Cell.
[8] M. Collart,et al. Characterization of NOT5 that encodes a new component of the Not protein complex. , 1998, Gene.
[9] James I. Garrels,et al. The Yeast Proteome Database (YPD): a model for the organization and presentation of genome-wide functional data , 1999, Nucleic Acids Res..
[10] Vladimir Batagelj,et al. Pajek - Program for Large Network Analysis , 1999 .
[11] Dmitrij Frishman,et al. MIPS: a database for genomes and protein sequences , 1999, Nucleic Acids Res..
[12] D. Eisenberg,et al. A combined algorithm for genome-wide prediction of protein function , 1999, Nature.
[13] Rong Li,et al. Genetic dissection of the budding yeast Arp2/3 complex: a comparison of the in vivo and structural roles of individual subunits. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[14] Z. Kelman,et al. Studies on the interactions between human replication factor C and human proliferating cell nuclear antigen. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[15] David R. Karger. A Randomized Fully Polynomial Time Approximation Scheme for the All-Terminal Network Reliability Problem , 1999, SIAM J. Comput..
[16] James R. Knight,et al. A comprehensive analysis of protein–protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2000, Nature.
[17] B. Schwikowski,et al. A network of protein–protein interactions in yeast , 2000, Nature Biotechnology.
[18] Ian M. Donaldson,et al. BIND: the Biomolecular Interaction Network Database , 2001, Nucleic Acids Res..
[19] F. Spencer,et al. Saccharomyces cerevisiae CTF18 and CTF4 Are Required for Sister Chromatid Cohesion , 2001, Molecular and Cellular Biology.
[20] R. Ozawa,et al. A comprehensive two-hybrid analysis to explore the yeast protein interactome , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[21] H. Herzel,et al. Is there a bias in proteome research? , 2001, Genome research.
[22] Gary D Bader,et al. Systematic identification of protein complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by mass spectrometry , 2002, Nature.
[23] R. Parker,et al. Ccr4p is the catalytic subunit of a Ccr4p/Pop2p/Notp mRNA deadenylase complex in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2002, The EMBO journal.
[24] Andrew J. Link,et al. Proteomics of the Eukaryotic Transcription Machinery: Identification of Proteins Associated with Components of Yeast TFIID by Multidimensional Mass Spectrometry , 2002, Molecular and Cellular Biology.
[25] Gary D Bader,et al. Analyzing yeast protein–protein interaction data obtained from different sources , 2002, Nature Biotechnology.
[26] Ioannis Xenarios,et al. DIP, the Database of Interacting Proteins: a research tool for studying cellular networks of protein interactions , 2002, Nucleic Acids Res..
[27] P. Bork,et al. Functional organization of the yeast proteome by systematic analysis of protein complexes , 2002, Nature.
[28] B. Snel,et al. Comparative assessment of large-scale data sets of protein–protein interactions , 2002, Nature.
[29] Gary D. Bader,et al. An automated method for finding molecular complexes in large protein interaction networks , 2003, BMC Bioinformatics.
[30] Stanley Letovsky,et al. Predicting protein function from protein/protein interaction data: a probabilistic approach , 2003, ISMB.
[31] Shmuel Sattath,et al. How reliable are experimental protein-protein interaction data? , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.
[32] Joel S. Bader,et al. Greedily building protein networks with confidence , 2003, Bioinform..
[33] L. Mirny,et al. Protein complexes and functional modules in molecular networks , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[34] Jerzy Majka,et al. Yeast Rad17/Mec3/Ddc1: A sliding clamp for the DNA damage checkpoint , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[35] D. Bu,et al. Topological structure analysis of the protein-protein interaction network in budding yeast. , 2003, Nucleic acids research.
[36] Ting Chen,et al. Assessment of the reliability of protein-protein interactions and protein function prediction , 2002, Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing.
[37] Alexander Rives,et al. Modular organization of cellular networks , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[38] M. Gerstein,et al. A Bayesian Networks Approach for Predicting Protein-Protein Interactions from Genomic Data , 2003, Science.
[39] Charles Boone,et al. Elg1 forms an alternative RFC complex important for DNA replication and genome integrity , 2003, The EMBO journal.
[40] Mark Gerstein,et al. Bridging structural biology and genomics: assessing protein interaction data with known complexes. , 2002, Drug discovery today.
[41] M. Gerstein,et al. Integration of genomic datasets to predict protein complexes in yeast , 2004, Journal of Structural and Functional Genomics.