Intermediate intrinsic diversity enhances neural population coding

Cell-to-cell variability in molecular, genetic, and physiological features is increasingly recognized as a critical feature of complex biological systems, including the brain. Although such variability has potential advantages in robustness and reliability, how and why biological circuits assemble heterogeneous cells into functional groups is poorly understood. Here, we develop analytic approaches toward answering how neuron-level variation in intrinsic biophysical properties of olfactory bulb mitral cells influences population coding of fluctuating stimuli. We capture the intrinsic diversity of recorded populations of neurons through a statistical approach based on generalized linear models. These models are flexible enough to predict the diverse responses of individual neurons yet provide a common reference frame for comparing one neuron to the next. We then use Bayesian stimulus decoding to ask how effectively different populations of mitral cells, varying in their diversity, encode a common stimulus. We show that a key advantage provided by physiological levels of intrinsic diversity is more efficient and more robust encoding of stimuli by the population as a whole. However, we find that the populations that best encode stimulus features are not simply the most heterogeneous, but those that balance diversity with the benefits of neural similarity.

[1]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Spatio-temporal correlations and visual signalling in a complete neuronal population , 2008, Nature.

[2]  Upinder S Bhalla,et al.  Non-redundant odor coding by sister mitral cells revealed by light addressable glomeruli in the mouse , 2010, Nature Neuroscience.

[3]  Alexander Borst,et al.  Disentangling the functional consequences of the connectivity between optic-flow processing neurons , 2012, Nature Neuroscience.

[4]  Peter Norvig,et al.  Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach , 1995 .

[5]  G. Westbrook,et al.  Glomerulus-Specific Synchronization of Mitral Cells in the Olfactory Bulb , 2001, Neuron.

[6]  Robert E. Kass,et al.  A Spike-Train Probability Model , 2001, Neural Computation.

[7]  M. Laubach,et al.  Redundancy and Synergy of Neuronal Ensembles in Motor Cortex , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[8]  Troy W. Margrie,et al.  Population diversity and function of hyperpolarization-activated current in olfactory bulb mitral cells , 2011, Scientific reports.

[9]  Troy W. Margrie,et al.  A biophysical signature of network affiliation and sensory processing in mitral cells , 2012, Nature.

[10]  Pamela Reinagel,et al.  Decoding visual information from a population of retinal ganglion cells. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  David S. Greenberg,et al.  Imaging input and output of neocortical networks in vivo. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  G. Edelman,et al.  Degeneracy and complexity in biological systems , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  Sarah M N Woolley,et al.  Discrimination of communication vocalizations by single neurons and groups of neurons in the auditory midbrain. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  G Bard Ermentrout,et al.  Optimal time scale for spike-time reliability: theory, simulations, and experiments. , 2008, Journal of neurophysiology.

[15]  Joseph J. Atick,et al.  What Does the Retina Know about Natural Scenes? , 1992, Neural Computation.

[16]  Michael J. Berry,et al.  Synergy, Redundancy, and Independence in Population Codes , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[17]  Paul Nurse,et al.  Cell Division Intersects with Cell Geometry , 2010, Cell.

[18]  Leonard Maler,et al.  Neural heterogeneity and efficient population codes for communication signals. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[19]  E. Marder,et al.  Multiple models to capture the variability in biological neurons and networks , 2011, Nature Neuroscience.

[20]  N. Stocks,et al.  Suprathreshold stochastic resonance in multilevel threshold systems , 2000, Physical review letters.

[21]  Alexander Borst,et al.  Effects of Mean Firing on Neural Information Rate , 2001, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[22]  Adrienne L Fairhall,et al.  Two-Dimensional Time Coding in the Auditory Brainstem , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[23]  J. Poulet,et al.  Internal brain state regulates membrane potential synchrony in barrel cortex of behaving mice , 2008, Nature.

[24]  Rainer W Friedrich,et al.  Temporal Dynamics and Latency Patterns of Receptor Neuron Input to the Olfactory Bulb , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[25]  Hermann Riecke,et al.  Neurogenesis Drives Stimulus Decorrelation in a Model of the Olfactory Bulb , 2012, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[26]  Liam Paninski,et al.  Model-Based Decoding, Information Estimation, and Change-Point Detection Techniques for Multineuron Spike Trains , 2011, Neural Computation.

[27]  Katherine I. Nagel,et al.  Biophysical mechanisms underlying olfactory receptor neuron dynamics , 2010, Nature Neuroscience.

[28]  N. Urban,et al.  Intrinsic biophysical diversity decorrelates neuronal firing while increasing information content , 2010, Nature Neuroscience.

[29]  Gasper Tkacik,et al.  Optimal population coding by noisy spiking neurons , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[30]  N. Spruston,et al.  Hippocampal Pyramidal Neurons Comprise Two Distinct Cell Types that Are Countermodulated by Metabotropic Receptors , 2012, Neuron.

[31]  Chun-I Yeh,et al.  Temporal precision in the neural code and the timescales of natural vision , 2007, Nature.

[32]  J. White,et al.  Sniffing controls an adaptive filter of sensory input to the olfactory bulb , 2007, Nature Neuroscience.

[33]  J F Mejias,et al.  Optimal heterogeneity for coding in spiking neural networks. , 2012, Physical review letters.

[34]  Wulfram Gerstner,et al.  How Good Are Neuron Models? , 2009, Science.

[35]  Wulfram Gerstner,et al.  The quantitative single-neuron modeling competition , 2008, Biological Cybernetics.

[36]  Michael J. Berry,et al.  Redundancy in the Population Code of the Retina , 2005, Neuron.

[37]  Saumitra Das,et al.  Interplay between NS3 protease and human La protein regulates translation-replication switch of Hepatitis C virus , 2011, Scientific reports.

[38]  C. Gray,et al.  Cellular Mechanisms Contributing to Response Variability of Cortical Neurons In Vivo , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[39]  Brent Doiron,et al.  Timescale-dependent shaping of correlation by olfactory bulb lateral inhibition , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[40]  U. Bhalla,et al.  Rats track odour trails accurately using a multi-layered strategy with near-optimal sampling , 2012, Nature Communications.

[41]  Jessica A. Cardin,et al.  Neocortical Interneurons: From Diversity, Strength , 2010, Cell.

[42]  J. Bower,et al.  Exploring parameter space in detailed single neuron models: simulations of the mitral and granule cells of the olfactory bulb. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.

[43]  Matthew C Smear,et al.  Precise olfactory responses tile the sniff cycle , 2011, Nature Neuroscience.

[44]  Lani F. Wu,et al.  Cellular Heterogeneity: Do Differences Make a Difference? , 2010, Cell.

[45]  J. Reisert,et al.  Olfactory receptor neuron responses coding for rapid odour sampling , 2011, Journal of Physiology.

[46]  Vikrant Kapoor,et al.  Activity-dependent gating of lateral inhibition in the mouse olfactory bulb , 2008, Nature Neuroscience.

[47]  Ryan M Carey,et al.  Temporal structure of receptor neuron input to the olfactory bulb imaged in behaving rats. , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.