The advantage of knowing the talker.

BACKGROUND Many audiologists have observed a situation where a patient appears to understand something spoken by his or her spouse or a close friend but not the same information spoken by a stranger. However, it is not clear whether this observation reflects choice of communication strategy or a true benefit derived from the talker's voice. PURPOSE The current study measured the benefits of long-term talker familiarity for older individuals with hearing impairment in a variety of listening situations. RESEARCH DESIGN In Experiment 1, we measured speech recognition with familiar and unfamiliar voices when the difficulty level was manipulated by varying levels of a speech-shaped background noise. In Experiment 2, we measured the benefit of a familiar voice when the background noise was other speech (informational masking). STUDY SAMPLE A group of 31 older listeners with high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss participated in the study. Fifteen of the participants served as talkers and 16 as listeners. In each case, the talker-listener pair for the familiar condition represented a close, long-term relationship (spouse or close friend). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Speech-recognition scores were compared using controlled stimuli (low-context sentences) recorded by the study talkers. The sentences were presented in quiet and in two levels of speech-spectrum noise (Experiment 1) as well as in multitalker babble (Experiment 2). Repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to compare performance between the familiar and unfamiliar talkers, within and across conditions. RESULTS Listeners performed better when speech was produced by a talker familiar to them, whether that talker was in a quiet or noisy environment. The advantage of the familiar talker was greater in a more adverse listening situation (i.e., in the highest level of background noise) but was similar for speech-spectrum noise and multitalker babble. CONCLUSIONS The present data support a frequent clinical observation: listeners can understand their spouse better than a stranger. This effect was present for all our participants and occurred under strictly controlled conditions in which the only possible cue was the voice itself, rather than under normal communicative conditions where listener accommodation strategies on the part of the talker may confound the measurable benefit. The magnitude of the effect was larger than shown for short-term familiarity in previous work. This suggests that older listeners with hearing loss who inherently operate under deficient auditory conditions can benefit from experience with the voice characteristics of a long-term communication partner over many years of a relationship.

[1]  R. Klein,et al.  Tympanometric measures in older adults. , 1996, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[2]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Speech Perception as a Talker-Contingent Process , 1993, Psychological science.

[3]  S. Goldinger Words and voices: episodic traces in spoken word identification and recognition memory. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[4]  Mead C. Killion,et al.  Erratum: “Development of a quick speech-in-noise test for measuring signal-to-noise ratio loss in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners” [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 116(4), 2395–2405 (2004)] , 2006 .

[5]  Rochelle S. Newman,et al.  The effect of talker familiarity on stream segregation , 2007, J. Phonetics.

[6]  T. Wiley,et al.  Acoustic-immittance measures in normal ears. , 1987, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[7]  Richard L Freyman,et al.  Effect of number of masking talkers and auditory priming on informational masking in speech recognition. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  M. Sommers,et al.  The effects of talker familiarity on spoken word identification in younger and older listeners. , 2000, Psychology and aging.

[9]  M. Kathleen Pichora-Fuller,et al.  Effects of aging on auditory processing of speech , 2003, International journal of audiology.

[10]  Liang Li,et al.  The Effect of Voice Cuing on Releasing Speech From Informational Masking Disappears in Older Adults , 2010, Ear and hearing.

[11]  D. Pisoni Some current theoretical issues in speech perception , 1981, Cognition.

[12]  Tyler K. Perrachione,et al.  Differential neural contributions to native- and foreign-language talker identification. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[13]  Kathryn Hoberg Arehart,et al.  Message and talker identification in older adults: effects of task, distinctiveness of the talkers' voices, and meaningfulness of the competing message. , 2009, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[14]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Effects of talker, rate, and amplitude variation on recognition memory for spoken words , 1999, Perception & psychophysics.

[15]  Stuart Rosen,et al.  Listening to speech in a background of other talkers: effects of talker number and noise vocoding. , 2013, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  Robyn M. Cox,et al.  Development of the Connected Speech Test (CST) , 1987, Ear and hearing.

[17]  Robert E. Remez,et al.  Perceiving the sex and identity of a talker without natural vocal timbre , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.

[18]  K. Kendall,et al.  Presbyphonia: a review , 2007, Current opinion in otolaryngology & head and neck surgery.

[19]  Lynne C. Nygaard,et al.  Effects of rate and talker variability on the recall of spoken words. , 1992 .

[20]  D L Schacter,et al.  Auditory priming in elderly adults: impairment of voice-specific implicit memory. , 1994, Memory.

[21]  John D E Gabrieli,et al.  Human Voice Recognition Depends on Language Ability , 2011, Science.

[22]  Stephanie Bor,et al.  Region, gender, and vowel quality: A word to the wise hearing scientist , 2006 .

[23]  P. Luce,et al.  Examining the time course of indexical specificity effects in spoken word recognition. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[24]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Talker-specific learning in speech perception , 1998, Perception & psychophysics.

[25]  Robert E Remez,et al.  On the perception of similarity among talkers. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[26]  Richard L Freyman,et al.  Aging and Speech-on-Speech Masking , 2007, Ear and hearing.

[27]  Catherine V Palmer,et al.  Efficacy of individual auditory training in adults: a systematic review of the evidence. , 2005, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[28]  S. Goldinger,et al.  Episodic encoding of voice attributes and recognition memory for spoken words. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[29]  Pamela Souza,et al.  Effects of Age on F0 Discrimination and Intonation Perception in Simulated Electric and Electroacoustic Hearing , 2010, Ear and hearing.

[30]  Cynthia G. Clopper,et al.  Effects of gender and regional dialect on prosodic patterns in American English , 2011, J. Phonetics.

[31]  M. Killion,et al.  Development of a quick speech-in-noise test for measuring signal-to-noise ratio loss in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[32]  L. Humes,et al.  Effects of long-term training on aided speech-recognition performance in noise in older adults. , 2008, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[33]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Effects of cross-language voice training on speech perception: whose familiar voices are more intelligible? , 2011, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[34]  Jennifer M. Fellowes,et al.  Learning to recognize talkers from natural, sinewave, and reversed speech samples. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[35]  L. Worrall,et al.  The effect of hearing impairment in older people on the spouse , 2008, International journal of audiology.

[36]  A. Boothroyd Adapting to changed hearing: the potential role of formal training. , 2010, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[37]  L. Humes The contributions of audibility and cognitive factors to the benefit provided by amplified speech to older adults. , 2007, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[38]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Effects of stimulus variability on perception and representation of spoken words in memory , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.

[39]  John F Culling,et al.  The role of fundamental frequency contours in the perception of speech against interfering speech. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[40]  D. Dahan,et al.  Talker adaptation in speech perception: Adjusting the signal or the representations? , 2008, Cognition.

[41]  Robert S Schlauch,et al.  The effects of fundamental frequency contour manipulations on speech intelligibility in background noise. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[42]  S. Folstein,et al.  "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. , 1975, Journal of psychiatric research.

[43]  Jennifer M. Fellowes,et al.  Talker identification based on phonetic information. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[44]  J. Preminger Should significant others be encouraged to join adult group audiologic rehabilitation classes? , 2003, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[45]  David B Pisoni,et al.  Identification and discrimination of bilingual talkers across languages. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[46]  D. Schacter,et al.  Perceptual specificity of auditory priming: implicit memory for voice intonation and fundamental frequency. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[47]  S. Scott,et al.  Comprehension of familiar and unfamiliar native accents under adverse listening conditions. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.