Why are we growth-addicted? The hard way towards degrowth in the involutionary western development path

Abstract By questioning the origins of the inertia facing the degrowth movement, this contribution identifies property as the constitutive institution of capitalism, and property expansion as the dominant socioeconomic process leading world societies to economic path dependence, techno-institutional lock-in and eco-social impasse. Demonstrating why and how property-based economic rationality subordinates ecological and social considerations to capitalist requirements, this paper stresses both the need for an inversion in the hierarchy of social norms and the systemic opposition to such an inversion, which emanates from the capitalist/industrial expansion. The text also brings to light some disregarded processes underlying the current economic crisis, by pointing out the institutional and technological locked-in situation into which the western development path has led our societies.

[1]  W. Steffen.  The Anthropocene, global change and sleeping giants: where on Earth are we going? , 2006, Carbon Balance and Management.

[2]  A. Karsenty,et al.  La sécurisation foncière en Afrique. Pour une gestion viable des ressources renouvelables , 1996 .

[3]  G. Heinsohn,et al.  Eigentum, Zins und Geld : ungelöste Rätsel der Wirtschaftswissenschaft , 2002 .

[4]  Thorstein Veblen,et al.  Theory of Business Enterprise , 1904 .

[5]  D. Bromley,et al.  Economic Interests and Institutions: The Conceptual Foundations of Public Policy , 1989 .

[6]  Nicholas Georgescu-Roegen,et al.  Process in Farming Versus Process in Manufacturing: A Problem of Balanced Development , 1969 .

[7]  G. Hardin,et al.  The Tragedy of the Commons , 1968, Green Planet Blues.

[8]  Pascal van Griethuysen.  Rationalité économique et logique de précaution : quelle compatibilité ? , 2004 .

[9]  John Kenneth Galbraith,et al.  The New Industrial State , 1968 .

[10]  Kin-wong. Che,et al.  On the formation of property rights , 1991 .

[11]  D. Meadows,et al.  The Limits to Growth , 2018, Green Planet Blues.

[12]  T. Veblen.  On the Nature of Capital , 1908 .

[13]  O. Steiger.  Property Economics versus New Institutional Economics: Alternative Foundations of How to Trigger Economic Development , 2006 .

[14]  H. Daly.  Steady-state economics versus growthmania: A critique of the orthodox conceptions of growth, wants, scarcity, and efficiency , 1974 .

[15]  1972) ENERGY AND ECONOMIC MYTHS , 1976 .

[16]  S. Ciriacy-Wantrup,et al.  "Common Property" as a Concept in Natural Resources Policy * 1 , 2019, Natural Resource Economics: Selected Papers.

[17]  M. Binswanger.  Technological progress and sustainable development: what about the rebound effect? , 2001 .

[18]  K. William Kapp,et al.  The social costs of private enterprise , 1951 .

[19]  J. Schumpeter.  The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle , 1934 .

[20]  O. Steiger.  Property economics : property rights, creditor's money, and the foundations of the economy , 2008 .

[21]  Carl Folke,et al.  Rights to nature : ecological, economic, cultural, and political principles of institutions for the environment , 1996 .

[22]  Franz J. Hinkelammert,et al.  Property for People, Not for Profit: Alternatives to the Global Tyranny of Capital , 2004 .

[23]  Barry C. Field,et al.  The Evolution of Property Rights , 1989 .

[24]  H. D. Soto.  The mystery of capital : the role of property rights in creating wealth and alleviating poverty , 2004 .