Cerebral magnetic responses to noise bursts and pauses of different durations.

We compared magnetic-evoked responses of human auditory cortex to short (5, 10, 20, 40, 80 and 160 ms) noise bursts and to pauses of identical durations in continuous noise. Onsets of both stimuli evoked responses with the most prominent deflection (N100m) peaking at about 100 ms. Both field maps could be explained by current dipoles, which agree with activity at the supratemporal cortex at slightly different locations. At the shortest 5-ms duration the noise bursts evoked a clear N100m whereas pauses elicited very low-amplitude responses or no response at all. For both stimuli, N100m increased in amplitude when the stimulus duration was increased from 5 up to 20-40 ms. The latencies were 10-20 ms longer for pauses than noise bursts with the longest latencies at the shortest stimulus durations. The differences in amplitudes and latencies as a function of stimulus duration and the slightly different source areas indicate that the generators of the on- and off-responses are not identical.

[1]  S. Buus,et al.  Measurements of equal loudness and reaction times , 1982 .

[2]  W. R. Garner.  The Effect of Frequency Spectrum on Temporal Integration of Energy in the Ear , 1947 .

[3]  Moshe Abeles,et al.  Single Unit Activity of the Auditory Cortex , 1975 .

[4]  R. Hari.  The neuromagnetic method in the study of the human auditory cortex , 1990 .

[5]  H. Davis,et al.  Effects of duration and rise time of tone bursts on evoked V potentials. , 1968, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  M. Hämäläinen,et al.  Feasibility of the homogeneous head model in the interpretation of neuromagnetic fields. , 1987, Physics in medicine and biology.

[7]  Kenneth R. Henry,et al.  Tuning of the auditory brainstem OFF responses is complementary to tuning of the auditory brainstem ON response , 1985, Hearing Research.

[8]  Albert S. Feng,et al.  Neural analysis of temporally patterned sounds in the frog's thalamus: Processing of pulse duration and pulse repetition rate , 1986, Neuroscience Letters.

[9]  T. A. Karasseva.  The role of the temporal lobe in human auditory perception. , 1972, Neuropsychologia.

[10]  R J Ilmoniemi,et al.  Cerebral magnetic fields. , 1986, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[11]  Seppo P. Ahlfors,et al.  Large-area low-noise seven-channel dc SQUID magnetometer for brain research , 1987 .

[12]  K. Henry.  Offset tuning curves generated by simultaneous masking are more finely tuned than those generated by forward masking , 1986, Hearing Research.

[13]  D K Eddington,et al.  Fundamental considerations in designing auditory implants. , 1979, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[14]  Human auditory on- and off-potentials of the brainstem. , 1979, Scandinavian audiology.

[15]  J. Mäkelä,et al.  Neuromagnetic responses of the human auditory cortex to on- and offsets of noise bursts. , 1987, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[16]  J Gips,et al.  Enhancement of the average evoked response to tone onset and cessation. , 1971, Psychophysiology.