Process Design and Techno-Economic Assessment of biogenic CO2 Hydrogenation-to-Methanol with innovative catalyst

A small-scale 10 ton per day methanol (MeOH) synthesis plant, from CO2 and hydrogen, is designed and simulated with Aspen Plus and a techno-economic analysis is conducted. The e-fuel (MeOH) is produced in a conventional fixed bed reactor featuring an innovative Cu/Zn/Al/Zr catalyst, converting biogenic CO2 from a biogas upgrading plant with H2 produced by a grid powered PEM electrolyzer. The process is thermally autonomous as a result of heat integration and combustion of purged unconverted reactants. A sensitivity analysis is carried out in order to evaluate and compare the impact of the different technical (purge fraction, Gas Hourly Space Velocity and Pressure of the methanol synthesis) and economic parameters (Capital Charge Factor, electricity and H2 cost) on the Levelized Cost Of Methanol (LCOM). Results show that, although the energy efficiency is greater (47.4 % electricity to methanol conversion) in the scenario with “self-sufficiency” in which all the net heat required by the process is provided by off-gas streams, the case with the highest profitability is the one with maximum methanol yield and, therefore, minimum purge and non-zero thermal energy import (provided by a biogas boiler). The best case scenario features a LCOM equal to 1,361 €/tonMeOH, with a GHSV of 7,500 h−1 and synthesis reactor operating at 70 bar, 250 °C. H2 production cost is the key variable and shall be reduced from the base case value of 5.8 €/kgH2 to 1.6 €/kgH2 in order to make the CO2 to methanol plant competitive with a MeOH market price of 550 €/tonMeOH; synthesis reactor operating conditions have more limited impact from a cost perspective, except for the purge fraction that shall be optimized to maximize the amount of MeOH produced.

[1]  L. Magistri,et al.  A comparative techno-economic and sensitivity analysis of Power-to-X processes from different energy sources , 2022, Energy Conversion and Management.

[2]  G. Groppi,et al.  Flexible Power and Biomass-To-Methanol Plants With Different Gasification Technologies , 2022, Frontiers in Energy Research.

[3]  F. Ferrara,et al.  Ex-LDH-Based Catalysts for CO2 Conversion to Methanol and Dimethyl Ether , 2021, Catalysts.

[4]  A. Lanzini,et al.  Methanol synthesis through CO2 capture and hydrogenation: Thermal integration, energy performance and techno-economic assessment , 2021 .

[5]  A. Tozlu,et al.  Techno-economic assessment of a synthetic fuel production facility by hydrogenation of CO2 captured from biogas , 2020 .

[6]  H. Spliethoff,et al.  Power-to-liquid via synthesis of methanol, DME or Fischer–Tropsch-fuels: a review , 2020, Energy & Environmental Science.

[7]  S. Kær,et al.  A comparative study on three reactor types for methanol synthesis from syngas and CO2 , 2020 .

[8]  M. Larmi,et al.  Techno-economic barriers of an industrial-scale methanol CCU-plant , 2020, Journal of CO2 Utilization.

[9]  S. Kersten,et al.  Wind power to methanol: Renewable methanol production using electricity, electrolysis of water and CO2 air capture , 2020 .

[10]  Jachin Gorre,et al.  Production costs for synthetic methane in 2030 and 2050 of an optimized Power-to-Gas plant with intermediate hydrogen storage , 2019, Applied Energy.

[11]  A. Mayyas,et al.  Manufacturing Cost Analysis for Proton Exchange Membrane Water Electrolyzers , 2019 .

[12]  Robin J. White,et al.  Economics & carbon dioxide avoidance cost of methanol production based on renewable hydrogen and recycled carbon dioxide – power-to-methanol , 2018 .

[13]  M. Asif,et al.  Catalytic hydrogenation of CO2 from 600 MW supercritical coal power plant to produce methanol: A techno-economic analysis , 2018 .

[14]  L. Falk,et al.  Kinetics of Methanol Synthesis from Carbon Dioxide Hydrogenation over Copper–Zinc Oxide Catalysts , 2017 .

[15]  F. Kapteijn,et al.  Challenges in the Greener Production of Formates/Formic Acid, Methanol, and DME by Heterogeneously Catalyzed CO2 Hydrogenation Processes , 2017, Chemical reviews.

[16]  Giulia Bozzano,et al.  Efficient methanol synthesis: Perspectives, technologies and optimization strategies , 2016 .

[17]  Mariano Martín,et al.  Optimal Process Operation for Biogas Reforming to Methanol: Effects of Dry Reforming and Biogas Composition , 2016 .

[18]  Chakib Bouallou,et al.  Investigation of power-to-methanol processes coupling electrolytic hydrogen production and catalytic CO2 reduction , 2016 .

[19]  Aristide F. Massardo,et al.  Feasibility study of methanol production from different renewable sources and thermo-economic analysis , 2016 .

[20]  Jyeshtharaj B. Joshi,et al.  Catalytic carbon dioxide hydrogenation to methanol: A review of recent studies , 2014 .

[21]  G. Groppi,et al.  Optimization of compact multitubular fixed-bed reactors for the methanol synthesis loaded with highly conductive structured catalysts , 2014 .

[22]  Waldemar Liebner,et al.  CO2-based methanol and DME – Efficient technologies for industrial scale production , 2011 .

[23]  椿 範立,et al.  Methanol Synthesis , 2018, Catalyst Handbook.

[24]  GLOBAL HYDROGEN TRADE TO MEET THE 1.5°C CLIMATE GOAL , 2022 .

[25]  Maria Grahn,et al.  Electrofuels for the transport sector: A review of production costs , 2018 .

[26]  Benjamin Engel,et al.  Analysis Synthesis And Design Of Chemical Processes , 2016 .

[27]  M. Bertau,et al.  Methanol: The Basic Chemical and Energy Feedstock of the Future , 2014 .

[28]  Robin Smith,et al.  Chemical Process: Design and Integration , 2005 .

[29]  Aacm Beenackers,et al.  Intra-particle diffusion limitations in low-pressure methanol synthesis , 1990 .

[30]  Eize Stamhuis,et al.  ON CHEMICAL-EQUILIBRIA IN METHANOL SYNTHESIS , 1990 .