Characterization and quantification of deposits build up and removal in straw suspension fired boilers

An increased use of biomass in large suspension-fired power plants can be a relatively economic and potentially also efficient way to utilize biomass for heat and power production. However, large deposit formation problems limit the electrical efficiency by limiting the maximum applicable superheater temperature, and the deposits may also cause boiler stops where different parts of the boiler have to be cleaned. This project aims at providing scientifically based knowledge on understanding of ash deposit formation and shedding in biomass suspension-fired boilers. Deposit probe measurements have been conducted in different biomass suspension-fired boilers by using advanced ash deposition probes. Two kinds of ash deposition probes have been used. A horizontal probe that has been developed further, which can register probe temperature, deposit mass uptake, heat uptake and video monitoring. First steps have also been taken for the development of a vertical probe that was employed for ash deposit formation measurements on a boiler furnace wall. In the first series of probe measurements, the influence of straw firing technology (grate and suspension) on ash transformation, deposit formation rate and deposit characteristics has been investigated. Full-scale probe measurements were conducted at a 250 MWth suspension boiler, firing straw and wood in suspension, and the results were compared with measurements conducted at a 105 MWth straw-fired grate boiler. Bulk elemental analysis of fly ashes revealed that fly ash from suspension firing of straw has high contents of Si, K and Ca, while fly ash from straw grate firing was rich in the volatile elements, K, Cl and S. SEM-EDS analysis showed that the fly ash from straw suspension firing consists of three kinds of particles: 1) flake type Si rich particles, 2) molten or partially molten particles (> 20 μm) rich in Si, K and Ca with small amounts of Mg, P, and potassium salts on the outer surface, and 3) small particles rich in K, Cl and S (aerosols, between 0.1 and 5 μm). Ash deposition data were compared with data from previously conducted deposit probe measurements in biomass-fired grate boilers. The comparison showed an increasing trend in deposit formation rate with increase in flue gas temperature. At a flue gas temperature of 650 ◦C, the deposit formation rate is typically from 5 to 30 g/m2/h and at 900 ◦C, the deposit formation rate is typically 20 to 110 g/m2/h. At higher fuel alkali vi ABSTRACT contents (K > 0.9 wt.%), the increase in deposit formation rate with flue gas temperature was more significant, compared to the increase in deposit formation rate at lower fuel alkali contents (K ≤ 0.9 wt.%). An increased flue gas temperature probably increases the fraction of molten ash as well as provides an increased content of gas phase alkali species, and both will lead to an increased deposit formation rate. The deposit formation rates during straw suspension firing and straw grate firing were on similar levels. This was observed even though the concentration of fly ash in the flue gas was higher during straw suspension firing. The objective of the second probe measuring series was to investigate the influence of fuel type (straw share in wood), probe exposure time, probe surface temperature (500 ◦C, 550 ◦C and 600 ◦C), and flue gas temperature (600–1050 ◦C) on the transient deposit build-up and shedding in a 350 MWth suspension boiler, firing straw and wood. Two different measures of deposit formation rate are used in the analysis of the data. The first is the integral deposit formation rate (IDF-rate) found by dividing the integral mass change over integral time intervals (of order several hours) by the time interval. The IDF-rate is then the result of both the deposit formation rate and shedding events in a given period. In this work IDF-rates were determined using 12 h intervals. The IDF-rate is similar to deposit formation rates determined from previous full-scale measuring data. A second measure, the derivative-based deposit formation rate (DDF-rate), was determined by calculating the local values of the time derivative of the deposit mass uptake, removing large negative values signifying major shedding events, and finally time smoothing the derivatives to remove excessive noise. The DDF-rate excludes the major shedding events. The overall DDF-rates were measured to be between 234 and 3105 g/m2/h. The IDF-rates were measured between 1 and 95 g/m2/h. The results showed that the DDF-rate was influenced by flue gas temperature and straw share, while changes in probe surface temperature had no significant influence. The IDF-rate, qualitatively related to the ratio between the time-integrated DDF-rate and the integration time, followed the same trends. Quantification of naturally occurring deposit shedding and deposit shedding during plant sootblowing was made via deposit mass uptake signals obtained from the deposit probe. The deposit shedding process was characterized by calculation of the amount of deposit removed at a shedding event [g/m2] and the frequency of the shedding events [h−1]. The results showed that the shedding process is stochastic and the amount of deposit removed varies even at constant local conditions. However, the deposit shedding rates showed an increasing trend with increase in flue gas temperatures and probe deposit mass loads. The deposit shedding rate was in most of the cases higher at a probe temperature of 500 ◦C than at a probe temperature of 600 ◦C. A possible reason for this is partial melting and/or sintering of the innermost deposit layer (rich in K, Cl and S) at higher probe viicontents (K > 0.9 wt.%), the increase in deposit formation rate with flue gas temperature was more significant, compared to the increase in deposit formation rate at lower fuel alkali contents (K ≤ 0.9 wt.%). An increased flue gas temperature probably increases the fraction of molten ash as well as provides an increased content of gas phase alkali species, and both will lead to an increased deposit formation rate. The deposit formation rates during straw suspension firing and straw grate firing were on similar levels. This was observed even though the concentration of fly ash in the flue gas was higher during straw suspension firing. The objective of the second probe measuring series was to investigate the influence of fuel type (straw share in wood), probe exposure time, probe surface temperature (500 ◦C, 550 ◦C and 600 ◦C), and flue gas temperature (600–1050 ◦C) on the transient deposit build-up and shedding in a 350 MWth suspension boiler, firing straw and wood. Two different measures of deposit formation rate are used in the analysis of the data. The first is the integral deposit formation rate (IDF-rate) found by dividing the integral mass change over integral time intervals (of order several hours) by the time interval. The IDF-rate is then the result of both the deposit formation rate and shedding events in a given period. In this work IDF-rates were determined using 12 h intervals. The IDF-rate is similar to deposit formation rates determined from previous full-scale measuring data. A second measure, the derivative-based deposit formation rate (DDF-rate), was determined by calculating the local values of the time derivative of the deposit mass uptake, removing large negative values signifying major shedding events, and finally time smoothing the derivatives to remove excessive noise. The DDF-rate excludes the major shedding events. The overall DDF-rates were measured to be between 234 and 3105 g/m2/h. The IDF-rates were measured between 1 and 95 g/m2/h. The results showed that the DDF-rate was influenced by flue gas temperature and straw share, while changes in probe surface temperature had no significant influence. The IDF-rate, qualitatively related to the ratio between the time-integrated DDF-rate and the integration time, followed the same trends. Quantification of naturally occurring deposit shedding and deposit shedding during plant sootblowing was made via deposit mass uptake signals obtained from the deposit probe. The deposit shedding process was characterized by calculation of the amount of deposit removed at a shedding event [g/m2] and the frequency of the shedding events [h−1]. The results showed that the shedding process is stochastic and the amount of deposit removed varies even at constant local conditions. However, the deposit shedding rates showed an increasing trend with increase in flue gas temperatures and probe deposit mass loads. The deposit shedding rate was in most of the cases higher at a probe temperature of 500 ◦C than at a probe temperature of 600 ◦C. A possible reason for this is partial melting and/or sintering of the innermost deposit layer (rich in K, Cl and S) at higher probe vii ABSTRACT surface temperature. This could cause the adhesion strength of the deposit to the probe to increase at the higher probe temperature. Quantification of the necessary Peak Impact Pressure (PIP) needed to remove the deposit was also made by use of a sootblowing probe in conjunction with the deposit probe. Results of deposit removal by artificial sootblowing showed that the deposits formed on a 500 ◦C probe temperature and at exposure time less than 91 h can be removed with a PIP of less than 55 kPa. However, an increase in probe exposure time and/or probe surface temperature (to 600 ◦C) significantly increases the PIP needed to remove the deposits. As a part of the third probe measurement series, full-scale probe measurements of deposit build-up and shedding were conducted at a 800 MWth suspension boiler, firing wood and natural gas, with the addition of coal fly ash. The results showed that the addition of coal fly ash can significantly affect the ash deposition behaviors and the deposit properties. At the location of the probe measurements with flue gas temperature of 1250– 1300 ◦C, although the addition of coal fly ash increases the

[1]  Wendy Taylor,et al.  Online! The Book , 2003 .

[2]  Khalid Rehman Hakeem,et al.  Biomass and Bioenergy , 2014, Springer International Publishing.

[3]  Haosheng Zhou,et al.  Ash Deposits Removal in Biomass Power Plant Boilers , 2007 .

[4]  Peter Arendt Jensen,et al.  Quantification of Ash Deposit Build-up and Removal in a Straw and Wood Suspension-Fired Boiler , 2011 .

[5]  Studies on sootblower jet dynamics and ash deposit removal in industrial boilers , 2013 .

[6]  J. N. Knudsen Volatilization of Inorganic Matter during Combustion of Annual Biomass , 2004 .

[7]  M. I. Jameel,et al.  Soot blower optimization; Part 1: Fundamental hydrodynamics of a soot blower nozzle and jet , 1994 .

[8]  K. Salmenoja,et al.  Chlorine-induced superheater corrosion in boilers fired with biofuels , 2000 .

[9]  Kim Dam-Johansen,et al.  Deposition and high temperature corrosion in a 10 MW straw fired boiler , 1998 .

[10]  ScienceDirect Fuel processing technology , 1977 .

[11]  Larry L. Baxter,et al.  Ash Deposit Formation and Deposit Properties. A Comprehensive Summary of Research Conducted at Sandia's Combustion Research Facility , 2000 .

[12]  Larry L. Baxter,et al.  Boiler deposits from firing biomass fuels , 1996 .

[13]  Mikko Hupa,et al.  Fouling tendency of ash resulting from burning mixtures of biofuels. Part 1: Deposition rates , 2006 .

[14]  Søren Knudsen Kær,et al.  Extending the modeling capacity of CFD codes applied to biomass-fired boilers , 2003 .

[15]  Søren Thaaning Pedersen,et al.  Experience with straw dust firing at Amager 2 , 2007 .

[16]  Seyed Abdolreza Ebrahimi-Sabet,et al.  A laboratory study of deposit removal by debonding and its application to fireside deposits in kraft recovery boilers , 2001 .

[17]  P ? ? ? ? ? ? ? % ? ? ? ? , 1991 .

[18]  Larry L. Baxter,et al.  Investigation of Ash Deposition Rates for a Suite of Biomass Fuels and Fuel Blends , 2006 .

[19]  Larry L. Baxter,et al.  Influence of ash deposit chemistry and structure on physical and transport properties , 1996 .

[20]  Kim Dam-Johansen,et al.  Deposition and High-Temperature Corrosion in Biomass-Fired Boilers , 1999 .

[21]  Avinash Kumar Agarwal,et al.  Handbook of combustion , 2010 .

[22]  城塚 正,et al.  Chemical Engineering Scienceについて , 1962 .

[23]  K. Dam-Johansen,et al.  Influence of deposit formation on corrosion at a straw-fired boiler , 2000 .

[24]  F. Frandsen Utilizing biomass and waste for power production—a decade of contributing to the understanding, interpretation and analysis of deposits and corrosion products , 2005 .

[25]  Peter Arendt Jensen,et al.  SEM Investigation of Superheater Deposits from Biomass-Fired Boilers , 2004 .

[26]  F. Frandsen Ash Formation, Deposition and Corrosion When Utilizing Straw for Heat and Power Production , 2010 .

[27]  P. A. Jensen,et al.  Ash transformation and deposit build-up during biomass suspension and grate firing: Full-scale experimental studies , 2012 .

[28]  Peter Arendt Jensen,et al.  Aerosol Formation during the Combustion of Straw with Addition of Sorbents , 2007 .

[29]  Larry L. Baxter,et al.  Impact of Mineral Impurities in Solid Fuel Combustion , 2013 .

[30]  M. Hupa,et al.  Fouling Tendency of Ash Resulting From Burning Mixtures of Biofuels , 2005 .

[31]  P. A. Jensen,et al.  Dust-Firing of Straw and Additives: Ash Chemistry and Deposition Behavior , 2011 .

[32]  Peter Arendt Jensen,et al.  Removal of K and Cl by leaching of straw char , 2001 .

[33]  L. Pedersen,et al.  Deposit characteristic after injection of additives to a Danish straw-fired suspension boiler , 2007 .

[34]  Peter Arendt Jensen,et al.  Dynamic mechanistic model of superheater deposit growth and shedding in a biomass fired grate boiler , 2007 .

[35]  L. H. Sørensen,et al.  Combustion experiments with biomass fuels and additives in a suspension fired entrained flow reactor – Test of Ca and P rich additives used to minimize deposition and corrosion , 2005 .

[36]  Robert H. Davis,et al.  Elastohydrodynamic collision and rebound of spheres: Experimental verification , 1988 .

[37]  Peter Glarborg,et al.  Shedding of ash deposits , 2009 .

[38]  F. Frandsen,et al.  Suspension-Firing of Biomass. Part 1: Full-Scale Measurements of Ash Deposit Build-up , 2012 .

[39]  P. A. Jensen,et al.  Co-firing of Coal with Biomass and Waste in Full-Scale Suspension-Fired Boilers , 2013 .

[40]  Peter Glarborg,et al.  Experimental investigation of ash deposit shedding in a straw-fired boiler , 2006 .

[41]  Peter Arendt Jensen,et al.  Ash transformation during co-firing coal and straw , 2007 .

[42]  H. Livbjerg,et al.  The formation of submicron aerosol particles, HCl and SO2 in straw-fired boilers , 1998 .

[43]  Larry L. Baxter,et al.  Ash deposition during biomass and coal combustion: A mechanistic approach , 1993 .

[44]  Peter Arendt Jensen,et al.  Deposition investigation in straw fired boilers , 1997 .

[45]  Kim Dam-Johansen,et al.  Emissions, Corrosion and Alkali Chemistry in Straw-Fired Combined Heat and Power Plants , 2000 .

[46]  P. Glarborg,et al.  Release of Inorganic Elements during Wood-firing on a Grate , 2006 .

[47]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[48]  Steven W. Smith,et al.  The Scientist and Engineer's Guide to Digital Signal Processing , 1997 .

[49]  Melanie Montgomery,et al.  Experiences with high temperature corrosion at straw‐firing power plants in Denmark , 2011 .

[50]  P. Glarborg,et al.  Co-combustion of Fossil Fuels and Waste , 2011 .

[51]  Mikko Hupa,et al.  Ash behaviour in a pulverized wood fired boiler—a case study , 2004 .

[52]  Kim Dam-Johansen,et al.  Deposit Formation in a 150 MWe Utility PF-Boiler during Co-combustion of Coal and Straw , 2000 .

[53]  Nader Padban,et al.  Ash transformations in pulverised fuel co-combustion of straw and woody biomass , 2013 .

[54]  L. L. Oden,et al.  The behavior of inorganic material in biomass-fired power boilers: Field and laboratory experiences , 1998 .

[55]  D. Chandra,et al.  Mineral Impurities in Coal Combustion , 1986 .

[56]  J. Koppejan,et al.  The Handbook of Biomass Combustion and Co-firing , 2008 .

[57]  John H. Seinfeld,et al.  Fundamentals of Air Pollution Engineering , 1988 .

[58]  B. Jenkins,et al.  Combustion properties of biomass , 1998 .