The middle house or the middle floor: Bisecting horizontal and vertical mental number lines in neglect

This study explores the processing of mental number lines and physical lines in five patients with left unilateral neglect. Three tasks were used: mental number bisection (‘report the middle number between two numbers’), physical line bisection (‘mark the middle of a line’), and a landmark task (‘is the mark on the line to the left/right or higher/lower than the middle of the line?’). We manipulated the number line orientation purely by task instruction: neglect patients were told that the number-pairs represented either houses on a street (horizontal condition) or floors in a building (vertical condition). We also manipulated physical line orientation for comparison. All five neglect patients showed a rightward bias for horizontally oriented physical and number lines (e.g. saying ‘five’ is the middle house number between ‘two’ and ‘six’). Only three of these patients also showed an upward bias for vertically oriented number lines. The remaining two patients did not show any bias in processing vertical lines. Our results suggest that: (1) horizontal and vertical neglect can associate or dissociate among different patients; (2) bisecting number lines operates on internal horizontal and vertical representations possibly analogous to horizontal and vertical physical lines; (3) at least partially independent mechanisms may be involved in processing horizontal and vertical number lines.

[1]  Patrik Vuilleumier,et al.  The Number Space and Neglect , 2004, Cortex.

[2]  John C. Marshall,et al.  Spatial Compression in Visual Neglect: A Case Study , 1991, Cortex.

[3]  M. Cappelletti,et al.  Unconscious processing of Arabic numerals in unilateral neglect , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[4]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Topographical Layout of Hand, Eye, Calculation, and Language-Related Areas in the Human Parietal Lobe , 2002, Neuron.

[5]  S. Dehaene,et al.  The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. , 1993 .

[6]  Felix Wichmann,et al.  The psychometric function: II. Bootstrap-based confidence intervals and sampling , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[7]  T Landis,et al.  Pure representational neglect after right thalamic lesion , 2001, Annals of neurology.

[8]  K. Zilles,et al.  Line bisection judgments implicate right parietal cortex and cerebellum as assessed by fMRI , 2000, Neurology.

[9]  Marie-Pascale Noël,et al.  Images of numbers, or “when 98 is upper left and 6 sky blue” , 1992, Cognition.

[10]  K. Heilman,et al.  Neglect and Related Disorders , 1984, Seminars in neurology.

[11]  N. Sagiv,et al.  What is the relationship between synaesthesia and visuo-spatial number forms? , 2006, Cognition.

[12]  Matthew F. S. Rushworth,et al.  The Mental Number Line and the Human Angular Gyrus , 2001, NeuroImage.

[13]  M. B. Bender,et al.  Spatial organization of visual perception following injury to the brain. , 1947, Archives of neurology and psychiatry.

[14]  K. Zilles,et al.  The Neural Basis of Vertical and Horizontal Line Bisection Judgments: An fMRI Study of Normal Volunteers , 2001, NeuroImage.

[15]  Geoffrey Finch Key Concepts in Language and Linguistics , 2005 .

[16]  K M Heilman,et al.  Peripersonal and vertical neglect. , 1990, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[17]  A. Milner,et al.  Distortion of size perception in visuospatial neglect , 1995, Current Biology.

[18]  Takeshi Hatta,et al.  Spatial structure of quantitative representation of numbers: Evidence from the SNARC effect , 2004, Memory & cognition.

[19]  Marco Zorzi,et al.  Explicit versus Implicit Processing of Representational Space in Neglect: Dissociations in Accessing the Mental Number Line , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[20]  Elisabetta Làdavas,et al.  Automatic and voluntary orienting of attention in patients with visual neglect: Horizontal and vertical dimensions , 1994, Neuropsychologia.

[21]  E. Bisiach,et al.  Unilateral Neglect of Representational Space , 1978, Cortex.

[22]  Chris Rorden,et al.  Non-spatially lateralized mechanisms in hemispatial neglect , 2003, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[23]  K. Heilman,et al.  Diagonal neglect on cancellation , 1997, Neuropsychologia.

[24]  M. Goodale,et al.  The visual brain in action , 1995 .

[25]  A. Milner,et al.  An Investigation of Hemispatial Neglect Using the Landmark Task , 1995, Brain and Cognition.

[26]  D. Boisson,et al.  Does Action Make the Link Between Number and Space Representation? , 2004, Psychological science.

[27]  G. Vallar Extrapersonal Visual Unilateral Spatial Neglect and Its Neuroanatomy , 2001, NeuroImage.

[28]  Stella F. Lourenco,et al.  Spatial attention and the mental number line: Evidence for characteristic biases and compression , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[29]  Wim Fias,et al.  Automatic response activation of implicit spatial information: Evidence from the SNARC effect. , 2006, Acta psychologica.

[30]  R. E. Crist,et al.  Configuration specificity in bisection acuity , 2001, Vision Research.

[31]  K. Heilman,et al.  Altitudinal neglect , 1988, Neurology.

[32]  R. Rafal,et al.  A systematic study of visual extinction. Between- and within-field deficits of attention in hemispatial neglect. , 2000, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[33]  E. Lavernia,et al.  An experimental investigation , 1992, Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A.

[34]  Richard A. Tyrrell,et al.  A rapid technique to assess the resting states of the eyes and other threshold phenomena: The Modified Binary Search (MOBS) , 1988 .

[35]  M. Albert A simple test of visual neglect , 1973, Neurology.

[36]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Interactions between number and space in parietal cortex , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[37]  J. Driver,et al.  Perceptual awareness and its loss in unilateral neglect and extinction , 2001, Cognition.

[38]  F A Wichmann,et al.  Ning for Helpful Comments and Suggestions. This Paper Benefited Con- Siderably from Conscientious Peer Review, and We Thank Our Reviewers the Psychometric Function: I. Fitting, Sampling, and Goodness of Fit , 2001 .

[39]  J. Marshall,et al.  Is neglect (only) lateral? A quadrant analysis of line cancellation. , 1989, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[40]  A. Milner,et al.  Line bisection errors in visual neglect: Misguided action or size distortion? , 1993, Neuropsychologia.

[41]  D. Spinelli,et al.  Vertical Neglect: Behavioral and Electrophysiological Data , 1997, Cortex.

[42]  K. Priftis,et al.  Brain damage: Neglect disrupts the mental number line , 2002, Nature.

[43]  John C. Marshall,et al.  How Long is a Piece of String? A Study of Line Bisection in a Case of Visual Neglect , 1988, Cortex.

[44]  Edoardo Bisiach,et al.  Perceptual and Response Bias in Unilateral Neglect: Two Modified Versions of the Milner Landmark Task , 1998, Brain and Cognition.

[45]  W. Oder,et al.  Altitudinal neglect in a patient with occipital infarction. , 2001, Brain injury.

[46]  Paola Guariglia,et al.  Dissociation between physical and mental number line bisection in right hemisphere brain damage , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[47]  P. Pantano,et al.  Unilateral neglect restricted to visual imagery , 1993, Nature.

[48]  Wolf Schwarz,et al.  Moving the eyes along the mental number line: Comparing SNARC effects with saccadic and manual responses , 2004, Perception & psychophysics.

[49]  Jordan Grafman,et al.  Handbook of Neuropsychology , 1991 .

[50]  K. Priftis,et al.  Arithmetic priming from neglected numbers , 2006, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[51]  Roberto Cubelli,et al.  Left of what? The role of egocentric coordinates in neglect , 1997, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.